• Posts: 7,941
  • Tag points: 14

Re: PvC Triangulum

100% agents or 100% wizzies and pop them

Make em cry.

Forcefields, sabs, nukes, OH, estorms, kill scientists (some will really be hurt by this)

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

227 Reply by Aces High (edited by Aces High 14-Apr-2013 03:58:49)

  • Posts: 537
  • Tag points: 4

Re: PvC Triangulum

^what he said wink

Valcona wrote:

we did clean core, but when they take a planet and leave 100K troops on it ...

i personally would jump someones agents and du them and make them regret it.  that's what the op is there for.  i know easier said then done, but you try all options if your a target of a bigger fam.  sometimes it works and sometimes it don't.   but, at least you tried smile .

“Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is no path and leave a trail.” — Ralph Waldo Emerson

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: PvC Triangulum

hmm kinda true their but their is alot of IA's going around i know ive seen some thats undoubtly some sort of shared info or something.. i did mention it earlier.. but i return the favor of payback to everyone who i feel cheats

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 537
  • Tag points: 4

Re: PvC Triangulum

i personally wouldn't know, i'm in one of the bottom fams and as far a i know no one is ia with anyone in my fam.  if so, then it is to make us a great farm lol .  if there is ia going on though (which is likely), it's sad players resort to that rather then play the game.  some people do anything to win, it's one of the problems with the game currently.

“Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is no path and leave a trail.” — Ralph Waldo Emerson

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 7,941
  • Tag points: 14

Re: PvC Triangulum

I've not seen IA actions yet, tho IC Death often resorts to such. That and nap breaks.

He is probably making excuses for a planned IA of his on a fam

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: PvC Triangulum

umm Einstein plz tell me where u are in tri?

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,436
  • Tag points: 23

Re: PvC Triangulum

SS peep at first spot;

says enough about this galaxy tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: PvC Triangulum

meh, nothing special considering the set up.

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: PvC Triangulum

nw means nothing he probably doesnt make really much of anything probably mostly fleet and stuff.. would u bet that 1 SS vs a entire fam.. i promise u he wouldnt last long

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: PvC Triangulum

I'm almost ranked last I think but we just had a war and I was dangerous!! tongue

3 planets and only wizzies with pax come get me lol

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,907
  • Tag points: 14

Re: PvC Triangulum

Omg my fams pure getting double teamed lol tongue

Been dreaming, I've been waiting, To fly with those brave ponies
The Wonderbolts, their daring tricks, Spinning 'round and having kicks
Perform for crowds of thousands, They'll shower us with diamonds
The Wonderbolts will see me right here at the Gala!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 185

Re: PvC Triangulum

The top 4 seems not willing to go after each other which is sad..IC used to be about conflicted EGO where if u are not in a tri-alliance setup = WAR even if its among the the top 6 wipping each other..nowadays top 4 fam just avoid each other and pick up the smaller fam..no wonder IC from 2K to 4K player per galaxy end up with less than 100 player per galaxy..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,988
  • Tag points: 241

Re: PvC Triangulum

Why would they go after each other, when it's more profitable to just explore and infra.

There can only be one fam as a winner, so it doesn't stand to reason that each of those fams will 'let' the other fam just win.

The problem is, too many planets availabe for easy exploration and whatnot.  No reason to fight, as its more of a case of gaining more through explore + infra, and hoping someone else hits your enemies.  That's enough to get you a win.

We need less systems and less distances.  Will help to incite more conflict.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,083
  • Tag points: 378

Re: PvC Triangulum

Torqez wrote:

Why would they go after each other, when it's more profitable to just explore and infra.

There can only be one fam as a winner, so it doesn't stand to reason that each of those fams will 'let' the other fam just win.

The problem is, too many planets availabe for easy exploration and whatnot.  No reason to fight, as its more of a case of gaining more through explore + infra, and hoping someone else hits your enemies.  That's enough to get you a win.

We need less systems and less distances.  Will help to incite more conflict.

This. Once upon a time it was a big deal to reach 100 planets, now it isn't a big deal for a banker to have 400 planets.

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: PvC Triangulum

We (philosophers fam) just warred 98 who was 3rd ranked at that time or 4th either of those just cause it aint in uni doesnt mean it didnt happen but i agree too much free space.

The new system sizes helped a bit allready now make less systems and we get more fighting

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: PvC Triangulum

No, no, no, the set up is fine except it needed to be squeezed into one sector.

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: PvC Triangulum

I dont see how 1 sector creates more fighting

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,083
  • Tag points: 378

Re: PvC Triangulum

By decreasing map size and reducing the amount of planets. It means that there is more demand for less supply.

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: PvC Triangulum

Yeah like we said but what does 4 sector or 1 sector has to do with that?

80x80 1 sector or 80x80 4 sectors... Dont see a whole lot of difference there

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

245 Reply by Big1

  • Big1
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 456

Re: PvC Triangulum

WOW Dead theard

RICKING

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: PvC Triangulum

WELL ATM IM (7994) IS FIGHTING (8008) SO I DUNNO IF U ASK AROUND WE (7994) HAVE NOT FARMED ANYONE THIS ROUND AND WE ONLY HAVE 2 Naps

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 783
  • Tag points: 25

Re: PvC Triangulum

LEGEND wrote:

Yeah like we said but what does 4 sector or 1 sector has to do with that?

80x80 1 sector or 80x80 4 sectors... Dont see a whole lot of difference there


I see a difference, some people can't play without some sort of dividing line big_smile

Friend is a four letter word.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: PvC Triangulum

What's wrong with 60x60? Or even 40x40?

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: PvC Triangulum

Nothing but that wasnt the issue here I was merely putting 80x80 as an example fill in 60x60 or 40x40 in as you please it doesnt change the sector story...

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: PvC Triangulum

When I say one sector I mean a smaller map, it can be four sectors if it makes people feel better, but same amount of systems squeezed into a 40x40 would be great imo.

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points