• Posts: 2,791
  • Tag points: 185

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

Just because i cancelled a nap which had no EOR date in it, doesnt make me wrong, infact what is a gentelmens agreement, when the agreement isnt with gentlemen?

Lee wrote:

Me? i broke a gentelmens agreement with a bunch of fktards......nothing wrong with that, nothing was ever official.

I'm confused.  Are you implying that other people aren't the gentlemen or are you admitting that you aren't?

Lee wrote:

What hydrop has done to 84, doesnt even come close to what i have done to 70/80, its not even close, in the slightest.

I think you're missing the point.  You've showed the galaxy that your word is worthless.  Unfortunately your allies are paying the price because they are your allies.  What 72 is doing to 84 is rough, but it is also the result of your actions.  Nobody else is to blame for this situation, other than perhaps 84 for being too loyal to you despite how badly you've treated them and how much trash you've talked on them.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366
  • Tag points: 13

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

dfsf wrote:

Also just want to point out that the fact that you saw 73/82 both cancelled on your ally but only one cancelled on you and then did not cancel on that other family yourself to help your ally shows just the kind of disregard and disloyalty you have towards your allies yet again.


i saw 73 cancel on me so i canceled on 82, :s so i am having fun with 4 teams with 25% of my spread gone smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

253 Reply by Lee (edited by Genesis 18-Mar-2013 01:56:36)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

[lala] off, hydrop has illegal alliances with 72 and WS i have been Told, and its blatent as cheese on toast. Hydrops alliance was about to war 73/82, all of a sudden there cancelling on us and not fighting hydrop then hydrop breaks a PNAP LOL - this is retarded, dont u dare compare me to that []

Im sorry but i never break naps, and i never IA with other people to gain unfair advantages. You may say this is a nap break, i say otherwise, i gave them notice and there was no date IN THE NAP AT ALL NOTHING NADDA obviously i didnt stick to my word, but whats new who does? i know most of 70/80 have done this in the past so dont dare make them out to be so innocent.

Yes they are not gentlemen, i wouldnt [wee wee] on them if they was on fire lets put it that way.

Edit: I offered to Renap 70/80 with the added terms Written and signed. they didnt want to, they wanted to fight. So tbh its all smoke and mirrors over and over.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

-1 Tag Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

You wanted everyone to kiss your ass and say sorry to you for a re-nap LOL

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

255 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

No i offered in ~PM to WS on irc after he booted me from ur channel, just to renap with terms made official.

I came to ur channel to make that happen. i was trying to figure out how to unignore you and josh, he booted me from the channel, i told him in PM, he said no they you all wanted to war and that u had a grand master plan i wouldnt expect and that i would lose a war.

well yes i didnt expect his plan, since he made an IA with hydrop and hydrop made one with 73....Some plan.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 102
  • Tag points: 5

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

i suggest Lee fam to switched leadership and put Lee as Rogue and or kill him off. imo kinda like a Bara situation.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

257 Reply by Lee (edited by Lee 17-Mar-2013 03:16:22)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

how about No?

My fam stand by me 110% - I have been there for them, Through thick and thin, they respect me as a leader and as a player. Love is in the Air Everytime i look around """"

All of them, so kiss my big black ass big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 102
  • Tag points: 5

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

And i love how everyone i see in most these forums fighting it out ingame and correcting the wrong are all old 33 Dirty Christmas mofos

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 102
  • Tag points: 5

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

hmm im good Lee on kiss that thank you for the offer though.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,537
  • Tag points: 7

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

I expected more of devil & lee..

-,-


-1 dude!

Dutch bastard

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

You signed a nap that said you and WS would agree to  a cancel  date when WS got back

WS came back and you agreed to cancel  date

This is not a gentlemans agreement it is clearly listed in the nap that  there will be a date agreed to... and there was... and you broke it..

The nap also said we would pay you a certain number of planets... because the coords weren't individually listed did we not have to pay you the planets then?

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

262 Reply by Stan

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

its quite shocking with all this talk about honor that people has ignored the fact that 72 broke a pnap! dfsf called it well. 2 wrongs dont make it right. This round is a damn shame. It has so much potentional

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan wrote:

its quite shocking with all this talk about honor that people has ignored the fact that 72 broke a pnap! dfsf called it well. 2 wrongs dont make it right. This round is a damn shame. It has so much potentional

I believe the reason they broke pnap is because the nap stated it had to be signed in relations... but it wasn't

I wouldn't trust something unofficial like that with Lee

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan wrote:

its quite shocking with all this talk about honor that people has ignored the fact that 72 broke a pnap! dfsf called it well. 2 wrongs dont make it right. This round is a damn shame. It has so much potentional

It definately had potential.  The pnap signing between the top 2 contending alliances though started the downfall of this round.

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

I love how it's the leading thread on our leading galaxy lol, how it wasn't closed after the super SPAM on the first page is incredible, I guess someone wanted to make their personal views known on one person so everyone else is brain washed into labeling him a douche for the rest of his days, just because of something that happened earlier in the round, 95% of the players posting in here have done similar or worse lol

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 767

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

[PW2] PICKLE ARMY wrote:
Stan wrote:

its quite shocking with all this talk about honor that people has ignored the fact that 72 broke a pnap! dfsf called it well. 2 wrongs dont make it right. This round is a damn shame. It has so much potentional

I believe the reason they broke pnap is because the nap stated it had to be signed in relations... but it wasn't

I wouldn't trust something unofficial like that with Lee


The Pnap between 81/72 & 78/84 alliances never stated that it had to be signed in relations.  The comp was paid to 81/72 alliance and the Pnap should have been honored by 72.  While I don't agree with Lee for using a loophole of some sorts (I was not around/aware of the terms) 72s break of the PNAP is worse than Lee's actions.  You guys had at least 48hrs notice, we woke up to our systems being cleared by a fam who we just paid an arm/leg to nap with.  Everyone claims to be punishing Lee for napbreaking my only question is once everyone is done destroying lee will they cancel their naps with 72 and 81 since they obviously are standing by 72s Napbreaking by not doing anything or unallying them.  I commend Devilz and Legend for standing by our allies instead of taking the easy way out and joining on the bash Lee train.  With that being said let the fun begin

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Of course we shall, Playa.  Unlike the 84/78 alliance that attempted to hide from their biggest competition in 72/81 by pnapping them without a fight, Our alliance won't just run and hide from that fight when the time comes to it.

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

268 Reply by WS IC Legend (edited by Genesis 18-Mar-2013 02:00:19)

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

I WANT EVERYONE TO REMEMBER HOW LEE GETS HIS BUTT WHOOPED

and takes his allies down with him.

I am going to see my master plan come to pass with perfection as this loser [] gets pwnt, gets WS'd smile

GJ 72 for standing against sorry players like Lee, devilz and yes even Stan.

Like I told HydroP at BOR he should have killed stan off then because Stan and Lee are like brothers as far as how they like to screw this game over.

and I LOVE the fact that Lee thinks there is IA with me and HydroP, I mean I just love that he thinks that. That makes me happy that he feels this is absolute truth smile and what a laugher that he also has IA with 73 what a moron Lee is.

Get ready to die n00b as my master plan beats you master ??? yourself loser

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

-1 Tag Points

269 Reply by Stan

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

enough with the name callings. I know you think its cool to talk shit because you dont rly have anything to say. But we get it, try something els then personal attacks. Stop talking and show you're worth in this "war" its been awhile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Yeah lol WS should have been forum banned pages ago, but I guess it's the same old story.... lmao.... gg Mods big_smile

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

You two should be forum banned too for picking on the handicapped.  WS is old and senile.  You two should be ashamed.

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,791
  • Tag points: 185

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

My fam stand by me 110% - I have been there for them, Through thick and thin, they respect me as a leader and as a player. Love is in the Air Everytime i look around """"

Yes, now that your original family is no longer intact due to your leadership.  And being through them through thick and thin... is that before or after you called them worthless without you?

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

273 Reply by ]PW[ Forever (edited by ]PW[ Forever 17-Mar-2013 04:47:53)

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

dfsf wrote:

You two should be forum banned too for picking on the handicapped.  WS is old and senile.  You two should be ashamed.





lol Indeed! big_smile

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

274 Reply by Babe

  • Babe
  • Babe
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 3,292
  • Tag points: 9

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Who r who in what fam etc? And i find this thread very amusing!

Airwing

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

I'm in 70 I think or 80

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points