76 Reply by dRaGoNsUP (edited by Remo 16-Mar-2013 11:29:57)

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Devilz wrote:

its like 20+ planets over 1 week, many messages...

Teugison (16,50)
Ecear (6,29)
Womhang (11,35)


@ Devilz,

Week 46, 13Reply Save
You have proposed that #7870 is allowed to make attacks on planet 11,25:12    withdraw
You have proposed that #7870 is allowed to make attacks on planet 11,31:18    withdraw
You have proposed that #7870 is allowed to make attacks on planet 13,35:18    withdraw
Signed, Wildstylez of 777 (#7884)

Week 45, 13Reply Save
need to be passed to 70.

[no posting coords in forum]
Signed, Lucifer of 666 (#7884)

these are the messages that i got from your fam the past few days, tell me did i miss out any? clearly it states your violation and for me to take. nothing about me passing to u any planets.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan wrote:
Chomp_On_This wrote:

I feel sorry for you're [butternut squash] Lee


Hey.. No thats not nice


OMG THATS SLANDER I NEVER TYPPED THAT STOP TROLLING ME I AM GONNA VOID OUR NAP NOW BECAUSE OF THAT HERPDERPHERPDERP

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

78 Reply by Oxygen (edited by Oxygen 15-Mar-2013 16:46:19)

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Another point to make: why would 84 fight with Lee when he obviously can't stand them? 

"10:51:30: <Lee> but allies are so far behind its a joke"


That's a horrible attitude for a fam that's been riddled with wars all round.  We started our round with 5 players and built the majority of expo phase with 5.  We were pretty far behind for a while and our allies never gave up on us or belittled us (not that I know if anyways).  We made a comeback and now we're having a decent round.  We have a decent plan to fight both alliances toward EOR and were going to have fun.  We've hit a roadblock lol

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

and this is why iam cancellingm ur a bunch of retards that just wanted to bully your way to EOR safely.

how about ur all POS's and il enjoy raping you all.

Now hydrop can call for a Pnap void via mod - not guna happen, unless they make new rules today which is stupid mid round.

Or to get me blocked, you cant block me for using technicalities its BS and would also require a new rule.

This will teach you all a lesson, to be nicer in future, all along you have all been horrible, ill manored and just Vile, constant slander, harrassment, now that is against the rules, but idc about that since il get my revenge idd.


You can't rape anybody if we are all in vmode tongue

Seriously though this is lame, not everyone in our alliance was making fun of you.  Josh and Chomp were trolling you and obviously couldn't deal with it so you do the dishonorable and break your word ... 

Of course you will not get blocked for this ... of course mods will not remove Pnap from Hydros alliance.


Take the high road and kick our ass on the scheduled date and re-sign the nap- right now it just looks like you were not talented enough to fight us in a real cancel war.

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

pre meditated nap break?

haha nothing was ever made official was it. my allies didnt agree to anythin and nothing was ever signed.

its like me saying, iam going to take a shit on the toilet in 3 hours, but i dont. does that make it true? No.

<Lee> Week 33, 15Send Another MessageSave
<Lee> no it wasnt, the msgs u Editied, i had a mod even check god dammit
<Lee> Sent to WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)
<Lee> -----------
<Lee> Like I said in uni I was lazy to dig the msg's but they were there stating you AGREED to 14 days
<Lee> Signed, WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)
<Lee> ----------
<Lee> but nothing was ever made official was it? did my allies agree to anything? No. was it signed? No.
<Lee> and next time dont make me out to be a liar in forums.
<Lee> Sent to WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)

theres WS admitting he faked the msgs btw just fyi

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Oxygen wrote:
Torqez wrote:

Anyway, just thought I'd share some logs of a convo I had with Lee before I left.

10:49:57: <Torqez> Yea
10:49:59: <Torqez> thats why
10:50:01: <Torqez> the longer we wait
10:50:03: <Lee> 72 1 aswell
10:50:05: <Torqez> the worse it is for us
10:50:09: <Torqez> cos we have 3 non-infra players
10:51:01: <Lee> ye
10:51:06: <Torqez> thats also why i think an eor war with 80/70 is stupid tongue
10:51:09: <Torqez> they'll eventually catch up
10:51:21: <Lee> i wanted to cancel like today...
10:51:30: <Lee> but allies are so far behind its a joke

----

10:55:02: <Lee> Week 46, 7Send Another MessageSave
10:55:02: <Lee> 48h alliance Core Nap between 7878/7884 & 7880/7870
10:55:02: <Lee> - it will be a EOR war with the dates of cancellation settled when WS gets on
10:55:08: <Lee> u know we never did arrange a date
10:55:14: <Lee> we can use thast to our advantage tbh
10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled
10:55:40: Torqez shrugs


Here's where Lee pre-meditated the NAP break BTW, for the galaxy to read. smile kudos to Torq for posting this!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

pre meditated nap break?

haha nothing was ever made official was it. my allies didnt agree to anythin and nothing was ever signed.

its like me saying, iam going to take a shit on the toilet in 3 hours, but i dont. does that make it true? No.

<Lee> Week 33, 15Send Another MessageSave
<Lee> no it wasnt, the msgs u Editied, i had a mod even check god dammit
<Lee> Sent to WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)
<Lee> -----------
<Lee> Like I said in uni I was lazy to dig the msg's but they were there stating you AGREED to 14 days
<Lee> Signed, WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)
<Lee> ----------
<Lee> but nothing was ever made official was it? did my allies agree to anything? No. was it signed? No.
<Lee> and next time dont make me out to be a liar in forums.
<Lee> Sent to WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)

theres WS admitting he faked the msgs btw just fyi

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Just face it Lee - you couldn't beat us straight up 14 days before EOR so you chose to cancel 26 days before EOR.  It sucks knowing no one will view this war victory as anything of merit, that no one will view any size win as credible.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

84 Reply by Chomp_On_This (edited by Remo 15-Mar-2013 16:56:03)

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

pre meditated nap break?

haha nothing was ever made official was it. my allies didnt agree to anythin and nothing was ever signed.

its like me saying, iam going to take a shit on the toilet in 3 hours, but i dont. does that make it true? No.

<Lee> Week 33, 15Send Another MessageSave
<Lee> no it wasnt, the msgs u Editied, i had a mod even check god dammit
<Lee> Sent to WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)
<Lee> -----------
<Lee> Like I said in uni I was lazy to dig the msg's but they were there stating you AGREED to 14 days
<Lee> Signed, WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)
<Lee> ----------
<Lee> but nothing was ever made official was it? did my allies agree to anything? No. was it signed? No.
<Lee> and next time dont make me out to be a liar in forums.
<Lee> Sent to WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)

theres WS admitting he faked the msgs btw just fyi

Why does it matter? You stated in this thread you agreed to the 14 days you [silly] coward.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

-1 Tag Points

  • Remo
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,297
  • Tag points: 31

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Chomp watch your language please. I understand you are upset just choose your words more carefully before posting in forum.

<&InSaNe> so for reference tco has a ticklish bumhole
<@SerialBusiness> good to know. I will make a note of this

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,236
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Cumsville wrote:

why dont you chill out and stfu, why is 48h not enough for you to save? if your so much better than 78 as you have been stating you are the last few days, 78/84 is "not even a top alliance" and you whining that we cancelled nap.

^ this post is the biggest joke ever

70/80 have actually warred ppl and not infrawhored all round (78)

70/80 does not have the infra that 78 has (due to infrawhoring)

how do you suggest they go about a war with maybe 1/4 to 1/3 78s savings? Skilled attackers are one thing, but in the end if the fig guy aint afraid to leave his figs out, u cant do shit to him

- The Galeonis Empire

[00:26] <&Walking_Corpse> mapgen doesn't work right for me
[00:26] <&Galeonis> yeah yeah same with ur penis tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 941
  • Tag points: 47

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

why isnt this war fair, but the one where 78 had 0 attackers for the first 2 days of the war with 81/72 would have been fair? just shaaat it!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

88 Reply by Lee (edited by I like pie 15-Mar-2013 18:26:33)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Oxy i could beat you under any corcumstances as long as im here to do it.

Now let me put u straight.

You guys talk about honor? yet you how me 0, Nadda, None.

you have done nothing but use personal references about my life to get me down, you have all harrassed me, called me stupid names, bitched at me, Made up lies to try and make me look bad (All of it is slander and against the rules)

Yet u expect me to honor you? are u crazy?

you will get no honor from me guys, nothing. When u start showing it u may recieve it back.

Period.

edit

Galeonis no they havent LOL they had 1 war with a smaller alliance, they have dont nothing by try to nap there way to the win, making stupid cluases in naps so they can infra till EOR then dominate, im not having it, and they call me a [pomegranate]? haha biggest joke i heard so far.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

-1 Tag Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Cumsville, have u not understood the only thing that is the central message of this thread?

Lee agreed to terms of a nap and is still going ahead to break it.

So if u are intending to support him in this lunacy, i suggest u change your name so that u wont be farmed and killed for being a napbreaker like Lee.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

90 Reply by Lee (edited by Lee 15-Mar-2013 17:13:52)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

Oxy i could beat you under any corcumstances as long as im here to do it.

Now let me put u straight.

You guys talk about honor? yet you how me 0, Nadda, None.

you have done nothing but use personal references about my life to get me down, you have all harrassed me, called me stupid names, bitched at me, Made up lies to try and make me look bad (All of it is slander and against the rules)

Yet u expect me to honor you? are u crazy?

you will get no honor from me guys, nothing. When u start showing it u may recieve it back.

Period.

edit

Galeonis no they havent LOL they had 1 war with a smaller alliance, they have dont nothing by try to nap there way to the win, making stupid cluases in naps so they can infra till EOR then dominate, im not having it, and they call me a pussy? haha biggest joke i heard so far.


Lunacy? Yes iam mad but with very good reason. You call it a nap break, i call it being using technicalities.

Now if you guys havent had treated me how you have done, it would have been 82/73 i cancelled on not you. but tbh you deserve this, you dont talk to ppl like that, and u dont treat people like that either.

If somone said any of the stuff you guys have said to me in RL pre-cancelation and throughout i woulda kcocked them the F out, this is no different, its called being an adult.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 941
  • Tag points: 47

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

nothing is signed in our forum, or our allies.
if i get killed next round because i stuck by my family and got on with the game then so be it.
ive done way worse in past rounds - and i can still play without grudges.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:
Lee wrote:

Oxy i could beat you under any corcumstances as long as im here to do it.

Now let me put u straight.

You guys talk about honor? yet you how me 0, Nadda, None.

you have done nothing but use personal references about my life to get me down, you have all harrassed me, called me stupid names, bitched at me, Made up lies to try and make me look bad (All of it is slander and against the rules)

Yet u expect me to honor you? are u crazy?

you will get no honor from me guys, nothing. When u start showing it u may recieve it back.

Period.

edit

Galeonis no they havent LOL they had 1 war with a smaller alliance, they have dont nothing by try to nap there way to the win, making stupid cluases in naps so they can infra till EOR then dominate, im not having it, and they call me a pussy? haha biggest joke i heard so far.


Lunacy? Yes iam mad but with very good reason. You call it a nap break, i call it being using technicalities.

Now if you guys havent had treated me how you have done, it would have been 82/73 i cancelled on not you. but tbh you deserve this, you dont talk to ppl like that, and u dont treat people like that either.

If somone said any of the stuff you guys have said to me in RL pre-cancelation and throughout i woulda kcocked them the F out, this is no different, its called being an adult.

Lmao. You do realize that by doing a shady move like this, you are just confirming all the 'crap' we talked about you right? Stay stupid Lee.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

Oxy i could beat you under any corcumstances as long as im here to do it.

Now let me put u straight.

You guys talk about honor? yet you how me 0, Nadda, None.

you have done nothing but use personal references about my life to get me down, you have all harrassed me, called me stupid names, bitched at me, Made up lies to try and make me look bad (All of it is slander and against the rules)

Yet u expect me to honor you? are u crazy?

you will get no honor from me guys, nothing. When u start showing it u may recieve it back.

Period.

edit

Galeonis no they havent LOL they had 1 war with a smaller alliance, they have dont nothing by try to nap there way to the win, making stupid cluases in naps so they can infra till EOR then dominate, im not having it, and they call me a pussy? haha biggest joke i heard so far.


lol. smaller alliance? i believe we were similar when we warred. 73 was bigger than us. not sure if 82 was. infra till EOR? hmmm. we have 2 alliance wars scheduled for the last 3-4 weeks of round. how about u??

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Remo
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,297
  • Tag points: 31

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Enough of the name calling and slander from all sides please

<&InSaNe> so for reference tco has a ticklish bumhole
<@SerialBusiness> good to know. I will make a note of this

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:
Lee wrote:

Oxy i could beat you under any corcumstances as long as im here to do it.

Now let me put u straight.

You guys talk about honor? yet you how me 0, Nadda, None.

you have done nothing but use personal references about my life to get me down, you have all harrassed me, called me stupid names, bitched at me, Made up lies to try and make me look bad (All of it is slander and against the rules)

Yet u expect me to honor you? are u crazy?

you will get no honor from me guys, nothing. When u start showing it u may recieve it back.

Period.

edit

Galeonis no they havent LOL they had 1 war with a smaller alliance, they have dont nothing by try to nap there way to the win, making stupid cluases in naps so they can infra till EOR then dominate, im not having it, and they call me a pussy? haha biggest joke i heard so far.


Lunacy? Yes iam mad but with very good reason. You call it a nap break, i call it being using technicalities.

Now if you guys havent had treated me how you have done, it would have been 82/73 i cancelled on not you. but tbh you deserve this, you dont talk to ppl like that, and u dont treat people like that either.

If somone said any of the stuff you guys have said to me in RL pre-cancelation and throughout i woulda kcocked them the F out, this is no different, its called being an adult.


FIGHT ME IRL BRO!!! ... DO YOU EVEN LIFT!!?!?!?!?

Lol anyway... I still think we are going to win this war... even with an 8th of your savings.  Lets all quit bitchin' and get ready for MWgeddon 2013.

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

same! 2 wars.

I like how u dodge what im saying, about the harassment and just general horribleness of ur families?

Il tell you what this is a 1 time offer.

All of ur family come and apologize to me on irc and post them in a "sorry" thread and il re-instate the nap and we re-sign with a cancellation date.

but your not guna do that, because ur all children with the mental age of 4?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

same! 2 wars.

I like how u dodge what im saying, about the harassment and just general horribleness of ur families?

Il tell you what this is a 1 time offer.

All of ur family come and apologize to me on irc and post them in a "sorry" thread and il re-instate the nap and we re-sign with a cancellation date.

but your not guna do that, because ur all children with the mental age of 4?

Is your ego really that fragile where some harmless crap talking in Uni News can make you break a NAP? I am sorry but I do not believe that, this is/was planned by you because you know you have no chance at winning in a straight fight between our alliances. Nice try at making a crappy excuse for your crappy actions though, what are you a child with the mental age of 4?

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Cumsville wrote:

nothing is signed in our forum, or our allies.
if i get killed next round because i stuck by my family and got on with the game then so be it.
ive done way worse in past rounds - and i can still play without grudges.



LOL. stuck with your family? why do u think Torqez deleted? why do u think Mizzle (your allies attacker) is sitting out of this war? its because they do not wanna associate themselves with Lee. simple as that. even Devilz from your allies again said that Lee lied to them in their face. so if u wanna go into technicalities like Lee, fine by me. U are just a hopeless cause. When we play we honour our word, simple as that. u and lee are just the black sheep of the community.

getting on with the game when u know that theres a clear nap break just defines your morals.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

99 Reply by dRaGoNsUP (edited by dRaGoNsUP 15-Mar-2013 17:23:29)

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

same! 2 wars.

I like how u dodge what im saying, about the harassment and just general horribleness of ur families?

Il tell you what this is a 1 time offer.

All of ur family come and apologize to me on irc and post them in a "sorry" thread and il re-instate the nap and we re-sign with a cancellation date.

but your not guna do that, because ur all children with the mental age of 4?


how many u fought before this? we already fought 1 and u pnapped the other top alliance. and now u decide to nap break on the only alliance that can put up a good war with yours. and u were planning to cancel on 73/82? arent they smaller than u and just came out of a war with us which they lost? i wonder why? accusing my fam of hitting a smaller fam when you are the one doing it???

oh harrassment? you cant take trolls? general horribleness? Lamest excuse ever. HAHAHA

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

stop whining.

war's happening.

no more bullshit posts. its going to be fun.

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points