• Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan, we will still fight your alliance X(

WS relishes the opportunity to go head-to-head with an alliance that doesn't nap break!  Even if we have shit for infra, we will still give it everything we have.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

yeah. It seams I might have to do the same this round to even the ods:P

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan, our objective was to fight all 3 alliances this round. We did to e best of our ability to make sure that our wars are spaced out. Sorry if we disagree that our alliance just wanna have fun, unlike your alliance and Lee's which haven't fought one proper cancellation war? U say we are spoiling the round because u guys didn't plan out your wars?

And we approached each alliance with an alliance nap just so that we can have proper cancellation wars, so that it was possible for each alliance to get shares with each other. Turns out that more than 1 alliance wants to sign a EOR nap so we spaced it out to e best of our ability which is 14 days.

Meanwhile, your alliance can infra whore all u want!!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

dude. Its not like we want to infra whore. Its not that easy. We begged lee's fam to fight. And all we want is a big fair eor fight to save our round. Thats why we only have 1 eor WAR planned.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan's pissed because 81/72 are done for the rest of the round now.  I get that, but that's on you.  You didn't have to give Lee a pnap - you could have either fought him with his "obligations" impeding his ability to fight OR you could have had him pay a small fee and warred him a week or two later.  Then we could have still had our fight.  Now that Lee is probably going to wreck us, you have nothing to do for 26 days.  I get that.  Don't blame us, though...blame Lee and blame your diplo for making a horrid pnap with 4 weeks left in round.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

ye perhaps. We might have been abit to nice with them. But what we got told was that lee where going to stop playing. So we diddent think the fam would survive. As they would have no attacker. Thats on us idd. I'm not pissed, just abit dissapointed in a new infra round

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

57 Reply by Lee (edited by Genesis 18-Mar-2013 01:18:28)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Chomp_On_This wrote:

Just to reiterate before Lee comes in and claims otherwise, he made it clear in this thread that he is essentially breaking the NAP:

Lee wrote:

i did agree to 14 days cancel time before EOR.

LOL

Yes i agreed with WS, nothing was ever made official so i have broke no nap, i have gave you 48hrs notice. face it thats life.

lets go, another 3 pages of whines! gogo

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:
[PW2] PICKLE ARMY wrote:

WS Please screen shot the message of Lee agreeing to the nap ending 14 days before EOR

i did agree to 14 days cancel time before EOR.

No family signed it, it was supposed to be added to the nap terms and never was, my allies didnt get spoken to about this matter. But he still faked some of those msgs, some of that stuff i did not say at all. this is a factor in my cancelation.

And the fact ur fams refused to give up violations in my allies core since ur war with 73/82 is another factor in this cancelation.

Also the fact ur fams have been total douches the last few days, harrassment, Slander, Fake msgs, so yes the nap is ending.

I wont post again in this thread until iam posting war details after 1st ticks.

Gl all and HF - I know i will


just bumping this back up to the top so people have right informarion, and not 70/80s smoke and mirrors.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee clearly only told you what he needed to in order to survive and rape us later.  I just didn't think he would break nap in this fashion.  Hopefully the mods will block him for this NAP breach because this is the reason this game is dying.

The offer is still on the table for a 2v2v2 but it involves Lee not being a scared bitch.  We've got ~45 ticks to figure it out tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 941
  • Tag points: 47

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

why dont you chill out and stfu, why is 48h not enough for you to save? if your so much better than 78 as you have been stating you are the last few days, 78/84 is "not even a top alliance" and you whining that we cancelled nap.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

"i did agree to 14 days cancel time before EOR."

- Lee


That's all anyone needs to know smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

62 Reply by Lee (edited by Lee 15-Mar-2013 16:24:10)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

how can i break an agreement that does not exist?

there was no agreement made between "our alliances" just me and WS nothing was ever made official.

You can keep quoting that i agreed to 14 days lada lada, fact is it was never made in the nap

iam going to enjoy taking ur alliance down to dust, you cant block me for playing the game, but GL trying, take this as my last post btw, il cya in what 44 ticks or so?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

lol, nice use of a technicality.  gg


"i did agree to 14 days cancel time before EOR."

- Lee

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

how can i break an agreement that does not exist?

there was no agreement made between "our alliances" just me and WS nothing was ever made official.

You can keep quoting that i agreed to 14 days lada lada, fact is it was never made in the nap

iam going to enjoy taking ur alliance down to dust, you cant block me for playing the game, but GL trying, take this as my last post btw, il cya in what 44 ticks or so?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

"i did agree to 14 days cancel time before EOR."

- Lee

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

66 Reply by Lee (edited by Lee 15-Mar-2013 16:31:05)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:
Lee wrote:

how can i break an agreement that does not exist?

there was no agreement made between "our alliances" just me and WS nothing was ever made official.

You can keep quoting that i agreed to 14 days lada lada, fact is it was never made in the nap

iam going to enjoy taking ur alliance down to dust, you cant block me for playing the game, but GL trying, take this as my last post btw, il cya in what 44 ticks or so?


time for food! il bbiab to re-quote this post.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

"I wont post again in this thread until iam posting war details after 1st ticks."

-Lee

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

"i did agree to 14 days cancel time before EOR."

- Lee

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

and this is why iam cancellingm ur a bunch of retards that just wanted to bully your way to EOR safely.

how about ur all POS's and il enjoy raping you all.

Now hydrop can call for a Pnap void via mod - not guna happen, unless they make new rules today which is stupid mid round.

Or to get me blocked, you cant block me for using technicalities its BS and would also require a new rule.

This will teach you all a lesson, to be nicer in future, all along you have all been horrible, ill manored and just Vile, constant slander, harrassment, now that is against the rules, but idc about that since il get my revenge idd.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

"Ok, I'm done. 


JUST KIDDING!"


- Lee

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

haha the world against Lee. Classic. Keep going do. This is fun

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

and this is why iam cancellingm ur a bunch of retards that just wanted to bully your way to EOR safely.

how about ur all POS's and il enjoy raping you all.

Now hydrop can call for a Pnap void via mod - not guna happen, unless they make new rules today which is stupid mid round.

Or to get me blocked, you cant block me for using technicalities its BS and would also require a new rule.

This will teach you all a lesson, to be nicer in future, all along you have all been horrible, ill manored and just Vile, constant slander, harrassment, now that is against the rules, but idc about that since il get my revenge idd.


QQ - you got trolled by Josh and co., you got your feelings hurt, so you break NAP before the AGREED UPON time.  I think that gives us plenty of right to troll you further.  smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

now i wanna pose a question to the family members of Lee and allies, whether u are condoning this BS or are u gonna stand up to him? Torqez, has stood up to his BS and deleted. What are the rest of you going to do?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

74 Reply by Stan (edited by I like pie 15-Mar-2013 18:22:32)

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Chomp_On_This wrote:

I feel sorry for you're [papaya salad] Lee


Hey.. No thats not nice

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Torqez wrote:

Anyway, just thought I'd share some logs of a convo I had with Lee before I left.

10:49:57: <Torqez> Yea
10:49:59: <Torqez> thats why
10:50:01: <Torqez> the longer we wait
10:50:03: <Lee> 72 1 aswell
10:50:05: <Torqez> the worse it is for us
10:50:09: <Torqez> cos we have 3 non-infra players
10:51:01: <Lee> ye
10:51:06: <Torqez> thats also why i think an eor war with 80/70 is stupid tongue
10:51:09: <Torqez> they'll eventually catch up
10:51:21: <Lee> i wanted to cancel like today...
10:51:30: <Lee> but allies are so far behind its a joke

----

10:55:02: <Lee> Week 46, 7Send Another MessageSave
10:55:02: <Lee> 48h alliance Core Nap between 7878/7884 & 7880/7870
10:55:02: <Lee> - it will be a EOR war with the dates of cancellation settled when WS gets on
10:55:08: <Lee> u know we never did arrange a date
10:55:14: <Lee> we can use thast to our advantage tbh
10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled
10:55:40: Torqez shrugs


Here's where Lee pre-meditated the NAP break BTW, for the galaxy to read. smile kudos to Torq for posting this!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

Posts: 51 to 75 of 339

Pages Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 14 Next

You must login or register to post a reply

Imperial Forum → Universal News → 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)