• Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan wrote:

tbh. What kind of naps are you guys making. You set eor war dates with all the big fams. IS this to avoid having to fight and just infra whore? our alliance have a eor date with 70/80  4days before rounds end. And then you have a deal with lees fam to end 12days before eor? OR do you acually think you can legit fight all the fams withing acouple of days?


It's a guarantee to have actual fun cancel wars, not shitty lame little skirmishes.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Our plan was to eco until a few days prior, save and war Lee for a few days.  Then, no matter what, we would NAP Lee and prepare for our war with your alliance (72/81 I assume).  That would have finished our round pretty solidly, but now we have to contend with a nap breaker.

We still intend to fight your alliance at EOR, but we may be crippled after this war smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Worst awnser ever. You cant be that retarded that you acually think you can war the top 2 alliances in that manner

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

10 days in between wars is plenty of time ...  why the hell do you care?  It doesn't concern you what agreements we have outside of your alliance.

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

30 Reply by Chomp_On_This (edited by Remo 15-Mar-2013 16:48:06)

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan wrote:

Worst awnser ever. You cant be that retarded that you acually think you can war the top 2 alliances in that manner


[Screw] you. I never said I thought we would win, just that it would be fun. So yes I ACTUALLY THINK WE CAN WAR THE TOP 2 ALLIANCES IN THAT MANNER. Figured Lee's war would take a day or two, then we would have like 5-7 days before the next war. That seems like plenty of time in between wars you big pussy.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

so I assume this is ur first eor war?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,988
  • Tag points: 241

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

I have to agree.  It was never done this way before either.

Chomp_On_This wrote:

It's a guarantee to have actual fun cancel wars, not shitty lame little skirmishes.

Shares exist already.  You just have different sized fleets.  Warring at this time of the round, gives you the opportunity to keep warring throughout the round.  You don't need to plan 2 months of skirmishes and infra, just to have 1-2 big wars at the end.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,988
  • Tag points: 241

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Not saying what you did is wrong.  But I was just disagreeing with the fact that a war at this stage of the round, can't be as fun.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

chomp. Dont be rude. If you think its that easy to beat another big alliance in a eor fight. Thats ok. I just though you guys where smarter. My bad

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Torqez wrote:

I have to agree.  It was never done this way before either.

Chomp_On_This wrote:

It's a guarantee to have actual fun cancel wars, not shitty lame little skirmishes.

Shares exist already.  You just have different sized fleets.  Warring at this time of the round, gives you the opportunity to keep warring throughout the round.  You don't need to plan 2 months of skirmishes and infra, just to have 1-2 big wars at the end.

Yea cause wars that last 3 weeks are tons of fun right? Please don't tell me how to play this game, I don't try and tell you how to play.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lol, it's a perfectly acceptable answer.  TBH, both of your alliances wanted to war us last week of round.  We actually wanted a 2v2v2 fight inside 7 days of EOR, but Lee was scared (clearly - he pnapped your alliance with 4 weeks left in the round LOL)

Since we obviously couldn't fight both alliances inside a week, we re-negotiated the cancel terms with Lee.  I asked Hydro prior to this if you would push back your cancel date (thereby keeping a cancel date of 7 days with Lee).  He said no.  WS then negotiated with Lee a 14 day EOR cancel war so we would have enough time to fight your fam 4-5 days until EOR.  This is a perfect timeframe to fight both alliances.


I think I narrated that correctly, but someone feel free to chime in if I missed anything/got something wrong.  I wasn't in charge of diplo smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan wrote:

chomp. Dont be rude. If you think its that easy to beat another big alliance in a eor fight. Thats ok. I just though you guys where smarter. My bad


I was returning the favor of rudeness, you called me retarded. Like I said it isn't about winning, it's about having fun. Having a week between wars if plenty of time to recover and make it a worthwhile war. Most wars these days are decided in the first few tics, rarely do they go more than a day.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

I mean. If you only want to figth and dont gain anything from it. But the win it self. Its legit. But i like to think we fight not only for the win but also for gain

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

* Stan looks at thread... thinks to himself "How can I make this thread about ME?"

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

clearly you know me so well. I love to spam forums and make everything about me. No. This is a big concern for my fam. We want a good eor war. We dont want to meet someone whos crippled by another war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

And you're the one being [un-noble], Stan.  We're rightfully pissed at this NAP break by Lee because we intended to get our eco in a position to have TWO fair fights with both alliances in the last 2 weeks before EOR.  Since Lee decided to cry about the trolling, he's ruined that.


We still intend to fight your alliance, though.  Seems you made a bad mistake by pnapping Lee, though.  After he farms us, you'll both have nothing to do for 3 weeks except prep to kill us (or farm everyone else if you're 78).

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

-1 Tag Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Torqez wrote:

Not saying what you did is wrong.  But I was just disagreeing with the fact that a war at this stage of the round, can't be as fun.

We just finished warring the other top alliance on Monday, we were saving to jump infra for the first time in 2-3 weeks when Lee decided to break a NAP on us. I don't disagree that now is a fun time to fight a war, we just have a really fun war with Oracle/Kens alliance. I am just saying we have had the last month of the round planned since like 3 weeks into the round.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,988
  • Tag points: 241

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Chomp_On_This wrote:

Yea cause wars that last 3 weeks are tons of fun right? Please don't tell me how to play this game, I don't try and tell you how to play.

..

Chomp_On_This wrote:

Most wars these days are decided in the first few tics, rarely do they go more than a day.

-_-

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,988
  • Tag points: 241

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Anyway, just thought I'd share some logs of a convo I had with Lee before I left.

10:49:57: <Torqez> Yea
10:49:59: <Torqez> thats why
10:50:01: <Torqez> the longer we wait
10:50:03: <Lee> 72 1 aswell
10:50:05: <Torqez> the worse it is for us
10:50:09: <Torqez> cos we have 3 non-infra players
10:51:01: <Lee> ye
10:51:06: <Torqez> thats also why i think an eor war with 80/70 is stupid tongue
10:51:09: <Torqez> they'll eventually catch up
10:51:21: <Lee> i wanted to cancel like today...
10:51:30: <Lee> but allies are so far behind its a joke

----

10:55:02: <Lee> Week 46, 7Send Another MessageSave
10:55:02: <Lee> 48h alliance Core Nap between 7878/7884 & 7880/7870
10:55:02: <Lee> - it will be a EOR war with the dates of cancellation settled when WS gets on
10:55:08: <Lee> u know we never did arrange a date
10:55:14: <Lee> we can use thast to our advantage tbh
10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled
10:55:40: Torqez shrugs

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,805
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled
10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled
10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled
10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled
10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled


LOL, it's 26 days from EOR.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

bah. This round is just going to die out again. Thanks to you guys:P

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Torqez wrote:
Chomp_On_This wrote:

Yea cause wars that last 3 weeks are tons of fun right? Please don't tell me how to play this game, I don't try and tell you how to play.

..

Chomp_On_This wrote:

Most wars these days are decided in the first few tics, rarely do they go more than a day.

-_-


Man you're really giving me a typing workout lol. Wars that drag on for 3 weeks suck for everyone involved and both families just get dragged down the rankings to be served up on a platter for a top fam that hasn't been warring anyone and just building infra. That is what I meant by that.

Most wars don't last more than a day, it's pretty clear in the first day who is going to prevail. If the losing family doesn't want to face this fact and drag it out then it gets dragged out but it's still obvious that the war is over.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan wrote:

bah. This round is just going to die out again. Thanks to you guys:P

Thank Lee. He is cancer to this game.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Stan
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 462
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

we will take their alliance. You focus on lee. Hes only 1 attacker. Cant take down 2 fams alone:P

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,988
  • Tag points: 241

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Stan wrote:

bah. This round is just going to die out again. Thanks to you guys:P

lol, nice of you to give someone else the responsibility this round tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points