• Posts: 3,537
  • Tag points: 7

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

smile yay me has fleet now !

Dutch bastard

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

[PW2] PICKLE ARMY wrote:

Oh ya maybe we will start nuking attackers and CPFFing bankers ... will THAT get you all riled up?


I'd find that very entertaining =p

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

153 Reply by Lee

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

i dont understand if 73 has this big fleet, why are ur attackers still close to there core yikes

shouldnt he have cleared u far allready?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,023
  • Tag points: 5

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

i really didn't see the low blow attacking style coming lol not from 70/80 thought with all there saving and great skills they was going to beat us man up for sure and not run and deportal shares and only attack bankers?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

-Kenpachi- wrote:

i really didn't see the low blow attacking style coming lol not from 70/80 thought with all there saving and great skills they was going to beat us man up for sure and not run and deportal shares and only attack bankers?


Wasn't the intent at all but just because things don't work out how they were planned doesn't mean you can't change strategies.

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

dfsf wrote:
-Kenpachi- wrote:

i really didn't see the low blow attacking style coming lol not from 70/80 thought with all there saving and great skills they was going to beat us man up for sure and not run and deportal shares and only attack bankers?


Wasn't the intent at all but just because things don't work out how they were planned doesn't mean you can't change strategies.

agreed.

Kenpachi mate, your attacker had more than twice the figs me and WS had. we tried to tag team the figs but to no avail. he started to hit us so we deportalled against him. how else could we have fought him?

so after deportalling, me and WS had to find people in range to hit. and since u spent everything on one attacker, we hit your bankers who are in range. or else are we supposed to just leave your bankers in our shares while we max out on morale? it is a way of hurting your income so that you wont be able to pay upkeep for that huge attacker.

it did work some sort since your attacker had to demolish some fleet to get into range with some of our players. this is part and parcel of the game.

lee, im sure u know how this feels cos me and josh did it to u once=P

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

LOL Low blow Kenpachi

Do you know ANYTHING about warfare?

There are always adjustments in war, we made the adjustment because of my godlike warring skills tongue  and it has worked .

Now justice is not even relevant anymore. he will soon be removed from our area which in reality he aint close anyway but the closest he has will fall soon

Then you aint seen nothing yet as for hitting bankers. Hows William McKinley doing anyway haha I almost have him in pmode with 2 droids per attack smile


----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
129 planet(s) captured by Wrath (100 %) (1 retakes).
84 planet(s) captured by Pride (100 %).
81 planet(s) captured by Mountain man (100 %) (14 retakes).
76 planet(s) captured by Phil Robertson (100 %).
5 planet(s) captured by Lust (100 %) (4 retakes).
2 planet(s) captured by Si Robertson (100 %).
2 planet(s) captured by Missy Robertson (100 %) (2 retakes).
-------------------
212 from #7873
167 from #7882
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 379 times. 2 families and 365 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 281 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 84.

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------
33 enemy planet(s) blown up by Phil Robertson
12 enemy planet(s) blown up by Pride
9 enemy planet(s) blown up by Wrath
4 enemy planet(s) blown up by Si Robertson
2 enemy planet(s) blown up by Sloth
1 enemy planet(s) blown up by Lust

1 planet(s) from Mountain man have been blown up.
1 planet(s) from Missy Robertson have been blown up.


---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
46 planet(s) lost by Phil Robertson
40 planet(s) lost by Wrath
28 planet(s) lost by Jase Robertson
27 planet(s) lost by Pride
17 planet(s) lost by Missy Robertson
16 planet(s) lost by Si Robertson
6 planet(s) lost by Lust
6 planet(s) lost by Mountain man
5 planet(s) lost by Gluttony
3 planet(s) lost by Sloth
2 planet(s) lost by Willy Robertson
1 planet(s) lost by Greed
-------------------
118 to #7882
79 to #7873

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 340
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

dRaGoNsUP wrote:
dfsf wrote:
-Kenpachi- wrote:

i really didn't see the low blow attacking style coming lol not from 70/80 thought with all there saving and great skills they was going to beat us man up for sure and not run and deportal shares and only attack bankers?


Wasn't the intent at all but just because things don't work out how they were planned doesn't mean you can't change strategies.

agreed.

Kenpachi mate, your attacker had more than twice the figs me and WS had. we tried to tag team the figs but to no avail. he started to hit us so we deportalled against him. how else could we have fought him?

so after deportalling, me and WS had to find people in range to hit. and since u spent everything on one attacker, we hit your bankers who are in range. or else are we supposed to just leave your bankers in our shares while we max out on morale? it is a way of hurting your income so that you wont be able to pay upkeep for that huge attacker.

it did work some sort since your attacker had to demolish some fleet to get into range with some of our players. this is part and parcel of the game.

lee, im sure u know how this feels cos me and josh did it to u once=P

Sounds reasonable. I wish I could hide WS's post from uni to find my way through the bullshit.
Love how he is gloating as if he is the mastermind behind it all. Derp, close this thread already xD

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,236
  • Tag points: 27

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

awww, is some new fool letting WS get under their skin?


hahaha sheep

Solis - #7872

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 115
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Wow WS, gloating about raping a banker. A banker smart enough to deportal his shares with you. I could even quote Dsup and remark how Justice held you "top" two attackers at bay. Legend my arse.

Dont forget to wipe your p*ssy front to back.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Eh the shares weren't deportalled =P

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

And it isn't just bankers that were hit, all other attackers in your alliance were cleared too.

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,537
  • Tag points: 7

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

In warfair it isnt the biggest fleet or best crap talking fam That wins..

We adapted to a situation.

73/82 is outgunned by pure strategy

In fact.. Your all dumasses for not winning this in 1 tic smile

Dutch bastard

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 115
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Lucky+me=Snailsex wrote:

In warfair it isnt the biggest fleet or best crap talking fam That wins..

We adapted to a situation.

73/82 is outgunned by pure strategy

In fact.. Your all dumasses for not winning this in 1 tic smile

*you're

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Phylotidees wrote:

Wow WS, gloating about raping a banker. A banker smart enough to deportal his shares with you. I could even quote Dsup and remark how Justice held you "top" two attackers at bay. Legend my arse.

Dont forget to wipe your p*ssy front to back.


held us at bay??lol. if a new guy who played one day jumped twice the fleet of an experienced player and the experienced player cant beat him due to the difference in fleet size, would u call that experienced player a worse player than the new guy?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

dRaGoNsUP wrote:
Phylotidees wrote:

Wow WS, gloating about raping a banker. A banker smart enough to deportal his shares with you. I could even quote Dsup and remark how Justice held you "top" two attackers at bay. Legend my arse.

Dont forget to wipe your p*ssy front to back.


held us at bay??lol. if a new guy who played one day jumped twice the fleet of an experienced player and the experienced player cant beat him due to the difference in fleet size, would u call that experienced player a worse player than the new guy?


Yeah lol Having a big fleet doesn't make a difference if you don't know how to use it. Wars are won by skill and execution. Not fleet size.

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

yea. if i can blindly just send in all my figs and dont have to worry about getting hit since no one will dare to hit my fighters, i would have the upper hand. I will be the one who will be the aggressor and killing the oppositions portals. unless nolio u can teach me how u would fight a guy with 7mil figs while u have 3mil? i really would like to know this lesson

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

dRaGoNsUP wrote:

yea. if i can blindly just send in all my figs and dont have to worry about getting hit since no one will dare to hit my fighters, i would have the upper hand. I will be the one who will be the aggressor and killing the oppositions portals. unless nolio u can teach me how u would fight a guy with 7mil figs while u have 3mil? i really would like to know this lesson


I'd be happy to show you smile

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,734
  • Tag points: 34

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Pretty sure Mizzle and I did it against Sol a couple rounds back in PW. It just requires work and sacrifice lol.

Oh, and no, I fell asleep on the couch, so my shares weren't deportalled. But as I said earlier, congrats about gloating on raiding me. Go ahead and keep blowing planets, that's the nice thing to do.

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Yeah we did got outsaved and outfleeted and cleared him nonetheless...

Carry on with the war entertaining so far ty for that big_smile

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

lol. Sol must have been a terrible attacker then cos if i had 7mil figs and u had 3mil and i had more ground than u, theres no way i wont be busting through your portals

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

The Seven Stages of War (7873) has signed a permanent NON-AGGRESSION PACT with us.
7882 to follow also smile

@Reindeer

go put your thongs on and play with your barbie dolls n00b

Their bankers didnt deportal, that was the main reason why I decided to change our strat and go after them and win that way.

AND IT WORKED idiot

Half the fleet justice had and we still won the war in under 8 ticks tongue

THAT IS SKILL N00B THAT YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.

our alliance is bad ass alliance and our 4 attackers kicked ass bad time

If you dont think so thats because you are in denial since we just kicked your alliances ass INCLUDING YOU n00b

anyway was fun but in the end Skill wins out every time smile

LMFAO Dsup, Chomp, Snailex, and I kicked ass so bad like taking candy from a nolio smile

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

So many violations in this thread... I can't beliefff it! lol


Go WS!! you bring Bad-Assery to A WHOLE, NUVA, LEVEL!! tongue

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,063
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

And 82 breaks nap after it is signed with hypnos to 80 and attacks on 70... maybe this isn't over after all...

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Comp being worked out for the nap break, war is over. I had a lot of fun, thanks for the fun war guys. Final stats:
----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
162 planet(s) captured by Wrath (100 %) (21 retakes).
100 planet(s) captured by Pride (100 %).
86 planet(s) captured by Mountain man (100 %) (14 retakes).
76 planet(s) captured by Phil Robertson (100 %).
22 planet(s) captured by Willy Robertson (100 %) (22 retakes).
5 planet(s) captured by Miss Kay (100 %) (4 retakes).
5 planet(s) captured by Lust (100 %) (5 retakes).
4 planet(s) captured by Si Robertson (100 %) (2 retakes).
2 planet(s) captured by Missy Robertson (100 %) (2 retakes).
-------------------
252 from #7873
210 from #7882
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 462 times. 2 families and 415 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 312 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 103.

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------
33 enemy planet(s) blown up by Phil Robertson
24 enemy planet(s) blown up by Pride
9 enemy planet(s) blown up by Wrath
4 enemy planet(s) blown up by Si Robertson
2 enemy planet(s) blown up by Sloth
2 enemy planet(s) blown up by Lust

---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
59 planet(s) lost by Wrath
46 planet(s) lost by Pride
46 planet(s) lost by Phil Robertson
28 planet(s) lost by Jase Robertson
22 planet(s) lost by Si Robertson
17 planet(s) lost by Missy Robertson
7 planet(s) lost by Mountain man
6 planet(s) lost by Lust
5 planet(s) lost by Gluttony
4 planet(s) lost by Sloth
4 planet(s) lost by Willy Robertson
1 planet(s) lost by Greed
-------------------
149 to #7882
96 to #7873

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points