• Posts: 340
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

The best wars I have seen so far are forum flaming wars. Better prove your worth on the battlefield, boys wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,988
  • Tag points: 241

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

I like pie wrote:

There's a lot of egos in MW right now who think they are gods of attacking.  Some of them are in this thread.  That's why I laugh when they defend their decisions to avoid wars, even though they are "smart moves".


lol Pie, I think you've been away from the game far too long.

MW has always been a Pissing contest.  Nothing has changed =]

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,832
  • Tag points: 187

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

yea pie u avoided the game for a long time.. if u would of cont playing maybe u would of made a difference

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,791
  • Tag points: 185

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Better late than never. =P

So any bets on this war?  I haven't picked a side yet.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

>chomp is in this war
>pie hasn't picked a side
>wtf m8

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

chomp and dragonsup is in this war together
pie hasnt picked a side
wtf m8

actually. take chomp out. who cares about him=P

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,488

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

pffff, I'll rape you both


<3

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

I have decided to ask my allies to sit the war out so I can WS 73/82

Yes, I will WS them both since they were so easy to push around before war. lol, I owned them before war and thats why 73 came to me asking for a nap because we were ruining their spread and pushing them away from everyone of the other alliances in the top 6.

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Hey sup and I helped WS X(

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366
  • Tag points: 13

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

just because your going to war with 70 and 80 does not mean you can use your core violations. please pass them up.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Your threat would probably hit them harder if you didn't give in to a bad alliance and offer them hundreds of planets just days ago.  Just saying.

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366
  • Tag points: 13

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

lol i had no part in that, that was lees decision, there were many different ways that war could have been played out, lee picked paying planets, this is why his team is paying 75% of the total comp, as our team (84) would have rather fought for 1 RL week to lose that amount of planets then to give them up without a fight.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,791
  • Tag points: 185

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Devilz wrote:

just because your going to war with 70 and 80 does not mean you can use your core violations. please pass them up.

Very interesting yikes

Imo if these systems are in fact used that's pretty dirty.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Sounds like the comment is towards 82/73, not WS and his alliance.

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,791
  • Tag points: 185

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

I'm getting my fams confused, ty for the clarification!

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

yes if 73/82 are using ILLEGAL planets owned thru a nap violation then thats a nap break and thus 84 has every right to cancel on 73/82 in order to remove them

in fact this is a problem MODS need to think about changing so once it is proven that the planets are in violation they can allow the fam to take them asap and not wait 48/72 hrs for the nap to be cancelled

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

They did change it with the planetary agreement part but it needs both families to agree.

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 635
  • Tag points: 226

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

73 has one violation which will be traded out before the war. 1

Oracle | Bane | The Justice 7873

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

1 for you but it was a good 6-8 for your ally =p

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,236
  • Tag points: 27

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

@dfsf

78 did not pay out to a "bad" alliance. 81/72 has probably been the strongest alliance in the round for quite some time. 78 was hindered by 84 quite significantly (would have cost them the war) and 73/82 has their own issues going on as well with stuff. 70/80 would have been a close second behind with 73/82 pulling in a real tight third. 78/84 was clearly the weakest alliance which is sad considering 78 was a powerhouse.

Solis - #7872

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 43

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Yeah but it's still you and booboo attacking.  Neither can manage a full round of quality attacking.

You have now been infected with Bird flu. Good day.


~Testudinae~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,236
  • Tag points: 27

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

We are as quality as anyone playing IC...keeping us as the top alliance easily.

Solis - #7872

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

We have DECLARED WAR on family Armed Presidents (7882).
Our relations with 7882 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 4 weeks.

Our relations with 7873 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 4 weeks.

We have DECLARED WAR on family The Seven Stages of War (7873).

The Seven Stages of War (7873) has DECLARED WAR on us.


4    The Seven Stages of War (7873) [72,27]                    1564    17087138   
6    Armed Presidents (7882) [81,90]                            1332    15289096   

vs

5    Look how pretty Pickle is! (7870) [20,32]                    1316    15343035
8    Dead Man Dead Presidents hehe (7880) [17,10]    1053    12540627

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 340
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

Devilz wrote:

lol i had no part in that, that was lees decision, there were many different ways that war could have been played out, lee picked paying planets, this is why his team is paying 75% of the total comp, as our team (84) would have rather fought for 1 RL week to lose that amount of planets then to give them up without a fight.

Honestly, I applaud such an attitude from you, Devilz. But if the #1 fam, with no less than 20% more NW than the #2, gives in to demands of families #4 and #6 or w/e, then the galaxy is ill. Such couwardness and lack of oldschool ways to settle the galaxy dominance are mindblowing.

We do not care who wins this war, to be honest, as long as it's fun big_smile

And Lee, congrats on winning Imperial Infra Whoring, we are about to settle THE Imperial Conflict wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,023
  • Tag points: 5

Re: 7870/7880 vs 7873/7882 war in 48 ticks

yea this war going to be fun we will give it are best shot wink

0 Dislike 0 Post Points