Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

that makes 2 wars this round between top alliances where it stopped before it started.

you can say what you want about top fams "playing smart" but this sure sounds like imperial trading to me =P

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

^^

Solis - #7872

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

well it was like this

i either pay the planets now or lose them anyway with massive infra losses, as im not around for the 1st 2 days of wartime and i was the only attacker.

tbh its crushed me, i cant even be arsed to play now.

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

thats true.. if u cant be online i'd rather pay too.. damage for missing a couple of ticks in a share war can be painful.. but i also agree alot of wars in mw are stopped due to people in fear of their round being ruined.. if 78 would of fought 80 instead of napping them it would of been a nicer round..

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

I like pie wrote:

that makes 2 wars this round between top alliances where it stopped before it started.

you can say what you want about top fams "playing smart" but this sure sounds like imperial trading to me =P

Tbh, I blame it on the set up (not why the set up is in place itself, but the resultant of what happens).

I mean, each fam has what ...2 attackers?  If you find an opportune moment, to cancel a NAP when the other fams' attackers can't be on - then yes, you've won your war, before it's even started.

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

I thought the idea was for fun, not winning....

Should of just arranged a time that everyone could be on, some of my favourite memories is fighting nap cancellation wars. They seem to of gone out of style though.

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

Yep, mine too.  Best part of IC.

Gone out of style some number of years ago, sadly.

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

I didn't realize planning a War included asking your enemies when it would be convenient for them? smile

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

If your the one cancelling, and are confident you have more savings, then why wouldn't you?

You should have fun, and still win? tongue

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

You assume it won't be fun?

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

Well, them just giving planets for a nap isn't very fun tongue

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

lol, why would you care if it's not fun for them? tongue

It's fun taking planets to gain and fight more later.

It was a common tactic back in the day to cancel on people when the time suits you and not them.  It should still be a tactic now even.  Nothing wrong with it.

What I was saying though, is that the setup with only 2 attackers or so, means you have to give up if thats the case, rather than try to drag something on.

38 (edited by ]PW[ Forever 08-Mar-2013 09:06:19)

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

ahh yes, this is right, I forgot they are small fams in MW now lol smile

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

Or we should have allowed their allies to login to Lee's account big_smile

True LEGEND

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

Lee wrote:

you dont understand do you, its nothing about EGO. infact it doesnt even come into it. im just telling you theres more skill to a cancel war then ur making out.

My family is 2 new players bankers, 1 old player playing pax and another rev.

how exactly can u counter a war with those races? u cannot its impossible against 4 attackers from another strong alliance.

So u can say what you want, in the end it was the best decision for the family.

making out like i pussied out from a fight, its anything but.

I do understand.  And again I'm not saying there is anything *wrong* with what you did.  And yes there is skill involved but it isn't attacking or war planning skill.  That's my point: that you have nothing within this round that shows you as a competent war planner or attacker.  If that's how it is then so be it, and if you want to save your family then that's fine.  However, that is exactly what your doing: saving your family' rank, not showcasing any competency as a wartime strategist.

You can talk all you want about how skillful of an attacker and a warplanner you are.  It doesn't matter.  So far this round all you have are your words.  You will not be remembered this round for leading a family that could hold their own.  You will be remembered this round for leading a family that avoided conflict to secure their top rank.

And it's not just you.  I'm hopeful for this war between 80/70 and 73/82 because so far my experience returning to this game has been a disappointing one.  I don't know if I will play again next round but I will surely remember this one as the round I played where people preferred not to fight.

It's boring.  No wonder people have left.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

Bat Suit - Luker/Cumsville
Aqua Beads - NEW player
Fwuffy Rabbit - Me
Barbie Doll - Brett
Toy Soldier - New player
Last login: Week 25, 10  Inactive    Flashlight < Dead

Tell me Pie, where and how my fam a top fam? Tell me, Take me out of that list and whats left? nothing. Without me being around for a war the 72/81 alliance would have farmed them to kindom come, i mean FARMED. what fun is that for a few new players and a old vet chilling? i bet you 100% they would have left the game and not returned. What i did let them carry on playing, and having fun doing what they wanna do.

the fact we are top is a miracle in itself we wont last there soon we will get outgrown, and if you class that as top fam then well ur highly mistaken. the only reason we are top and have been through eco phase is simply down to my infra co-ordination and nothing more, and i haven't claimed its because of anything else.

Tbh seein as ur a dev you do an awful lot of bashing, reminds me of that convo we had on irc not long ago, for which u apologized for. remember?


You keep waffling on about, naps this, top fams that.....MW has always been like this, fams dodging wars, fams getting farmed, you just notice it more now, because of the lack of families and players.

thats all.

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

Lee wrote:

Bat Suit - Luker/Cumsville
Aqua Beads - NEW player
Fwuffy Rabbit - Me
Barbie Doll - Brett
Toy Soldier - New player
Last login: Week 25, 10  Inactive    Flashlight < Dead

Tell me Pie, where and how my fam a top fam? Tell me, Take me out of that list and whats left? nothing.

And what about Torqez?  You say this isn't about ego but then you say your family is nothing without you?  Is it any surprise that you lose players under that kind of leadership?  And what about your allies?  You have them after all, they could have stepped up for the war and even if it was a losing effort at least they could have tried.  But nothing like that happened.

Instead, it's the "Lee Show" whereas if you can't make the starting hours of the war then the war doesn't happen.  How is that not about ego?  Why not let your family try?  Better yet, why not *encourage* them to try?  Is your fam's rank so precious that you'll deprive them of experience?  Losing a war badly can be a good thing.  I've said it many times and I'll say it again that that is how you find gems.  That is where true skill shines.  Most importantly that's how players learn to fight back.

Believe it or not, there is fun to be had during a losing war.  You are betting me "100%" on your players leaving if the war went on, but you can't possibly know that for certain.  Imo you're not saving your family, you're denying them an opportunity to actually play the game.  If that's their idea of "having fun doing what they wanna do" then I guess that further proves my point about the state of this game.  People would rather plan econ than fight?  Surely you've heard people joke about "Imperial Infra".  Do you think that's a good thing?

Lee wrote:

the only reason we are top and have been through eco phase is simply down to my infra co-ordination and nothing more, and i haven't claimed its because of anything else.

This attitude is unfortunate.  You are saying that your own family members don't have any part of that?  You are making your family sound helpless without you.  If that really is the case then the war would be a perfect opportunity for them to learn how to fight, and an opportunity for you teach them.

What's more important, "saving" your family or letting them get some experience?

Lee wrote:

Tbh seein as ur a dev you do an awful lot of bashing, reminds me of that convo we had on irc not long ago, for which u apologized for. remember?

Yes I do remember.  I remembered explaining that you misinterpreted my comment and I didn't mean to offend you.  I remember that you never replied to my apology to acknowledge it, yet you came to me for help with you DPA problem.

I also remember you telling me that I need to work on my interpersonal skills.  I ask that you consider this yourself because what you're saying here is that your family is #1 because of you alone and they are all helpless without you.

Lee wrote:

You keep waffling on about, naps this, top fams that.....MW has always been like this, fams dodging wars, fams getting farmed, you just notice it more now, because of the lack of families and players.

thats all.

I disagree.  MW has always had its share of war dodging and farming yes, but it has also had its share of interesting wars.  This no longer seems to be the case.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

Lee wrote:
I like pie wrote:

Still more interesting than the 2 "let's war, wait nevermind let's just give/accept planets to salvage our rank" embarrassments we've seen thus far.

There's a lot of egos in MW right now who think they are gods of attacking.  Some of them are in this thread.  That's why I laugh when they defend their decisions to avoid wars, even though they are "smart moves".

The current Milky Way reminds me more of the first round of Pinwheel.  Things has gotten soft and rank-focused.  MW's events thus far are proof of this.


erm i find this highly offensive yikes

iam the only attacker in my fam, iam away all weekend, ur comments are unjustified i was hardly going to let my bankers get savaged was i.

if i could have fought i would have, let that be known right now!!!! u do realise how much it hurt me to accept there demands right? extremely!

I understand Lee, and I sympathize.  I'm in a similar boat also being the leader and only attacker in my family.  However, it just isn't true that you had "no choice".  My comments are in regard to what people fear losing: rank.  Maybe I've just been away too long but I remember that the game used to be played for the wars, and bankers knew how to fight as well.

I know you had a tough choice, and like I said I don't blame you for prioritizing IC below more important things.  However, these decisions (as in, the 2 top fam non-wars this round) are clear indicators that this game is no longer about conflict: it's about getting the highest rank.  It's an unfortunate state for a game about war to be in.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

To say it another way Lee, you really had 3 choices:

1) call in sick on first day (bad choice)
2) pay planets for your fam's "benefit" (rank-preserving choice)
3) accept that the odds are against your fam's favor and strategize around this challenge (imo the "old-school" choice)

Unfortunately #3 is now widely seen as a stupid choice, whereas in earlier days #2 would be seen as a shameful choice.  To me that says something about the attitude of people who currently play this game.  Things have clearly changed to value "top spot" more than fighting a worthwhile battle.

For a game that is supposedly about war, that is quite sad.  And no, none of you "gods of attacking" are actually as skilled at attacking as you think you are because like I said, this style of play discourages actual fighting.  Again this is clearly evident by the MW events this round.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

i dissagree, there is more skill to a cancel war then ur making out.

put us in a test galaxy, give us the same amount of fleet, and shares, and i bet you i kill ur fleet within a few hours.

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

Lee wrote:

i dissagree, there is more skill to a cancel war then ur making out.

put us in a test galaxy, give us the same amount of fleet, and shares, and i bet you i kill ur fleet within a few hours.

This what I mean about egos.  What exactly are you basing this off of?  My family's current round?  The prior round where I came in towards the end to a family that had most of its players blocked/deleted or inactive?

All you have is your ego and your words.  You aren't basing a statement like that on any meaningful evaluation of my skills as an attacker, you're basing it on your own idea of what attacking skills you yourself have.  Like I said, your family's current MW round is meaningless to that point.

Yes you may in fact be a better attacker than me, but you also may not be.  This is the difference between players with inflated egos and those without.  You claim to be able to kill my fleet within a few hours.  I wouldn't make such claims because they are pointless.  I'd rather attack to showcase my ability.

In the end though, you yourself only have words to rely on.  Your family gave away planets to avoid a war that was against their favor.  You lost more than planets by doing so: you lost your opportunity to showcase your skill as a leader and your skill as a strategist.  You could have taken this as a challenge and an opportunity to flex your strategic muscles, to coordinate with your family beforehand on a defensive strategy to hold you guys over until you come back to clean things up and even perhaps turn the war around.

Instead, you paid to avoid having to do so.  This is why I'm not surprised when you make claims like "i bet you i kill ur fleet within a few hours".  These words are all you have, because you and other players like you actively give away your chance to showcase any skill in order to preserve rank.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

Pie > Lee. This isn't a debate lol

Sex without the e is still SX!

48 (edited by Lee 08-Mar-2013 23:05:02)

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

you dont understand do you, its nothing about EGO. infact it doesnt even come into it. im just telling you theres more skill to a cancel war then ur making out.

My family is 2 new players bankers, 1 old player playing pax and another rev.

how exactly can u counter a war with those races? u cannot its impossible against 4 attackers from another strong alliance.

So u can say what you want, in the end it was the best decision for the family.

making out like i pussied out from a fight, its anything but. i could not be here for 2 days to defend my family, plan anything, co-ordinate anything and there pretty useless unless i give them specific instructions daily. iam mainly teaching half the fam........paying to renap was the best option, rather then lose the same amount of planets and all my infra i retained our rank and we live to fight another day, preferably next time on my terms!

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

I like pie wrote:

Still more interesting than the 2 "let's war, wait nevermind let's just give/accept planets to salvage our rank" embarrassments we've seen thus far.

There's a lot of egos in MW right now who think they are gods of attacking.  Some of them are in this thread.  That's why I laugh when they defend their decisions to avoid wars, even though they are "smart moves".

The current Milky Way reminds me more of the first round of Pinwheel.  Things has gotten soft and rank-focused.  MW's events thus far are proof of this.


erm i find this highly offensive yikes

iam the only attacker in my fam, iam away all weekend, ur comments are unjustified i was hardly going to let my bankers get savaged was i.

if i could have fought i would have, let that be known right now!!!! u do realise how much it hurt me to accept there demands right? extremely!

Re: The Phaedra and Accumulator War

The order of the posts got all screwed up in the move.

Anyway, Lee: don't take any of this personally.  I am simply commenting on the state of the game as observed through the actions of the top ranked families.  This includes you.  We're all entitled to play the game as we wish, I simply feel that your idea of what is "best" for your family is really depriving your players of a great opportunity to learn how to fight back.

The only reason I bother posting about this stuff is because I get so much shit from other leaders (including you) during diplo talks for playing how I do.  Yet the top fams imo are pulling stuff like this that to me shows what the focus really is: rank.

Many of you guys have all done a great job playing your way out of having to war with eacother.  For a war game, that's pretty sad.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!