Re: Reforming Rank: What does it mean to win?
We were discussing this in a MW PvC thread: What is the "official" winning metric, and does it matter if people ignore it for something else?
Many people consider size to be the end-all decider of who wins a round. It makes sense for a game that is war-focused that size be the end goal. However, Networth is arguably more important in that the word itself literally means the ending value.
And then there's score, which was added to the game later.
This is confusing. A game should have a singular, definitive metric to determine winner. We should be able to answer the question "What family won Milky Way round 51?" by stating a family name. Not saying "Fam A won size but Fam B won nw. However Fam C won score".
Score was supposed to fix this, but apparently people are reluctant to accept it. It isn't clear why.
What are your thoughts on rank and what it means to "win" in this game? It's within our power to change things if the current system doesn't make sense. We just need to figure it out.