note the date that Einstein finally called for a final solution

"Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection." - Martin Luther King Jr.

Einstein,

You're just angry that everything I said is true. And it's not my problem, nor is it my failing.

Is it not true that Republicans have had the capacity (votes) to audit the Fed's policies repeatedly in the past, but consistently passed up every opportunity? Yes, that's a fact. You're changing the subject, not me.

All you're doing is bloviating about me. You're not providing any evidence that Republicans actually disagree with Democrats at all on this topic. You're not providing any such argument at all, just complaining that you don't like the facts I bring up.

It angers you that Republicans and Democrats agree on this subject, so you call me a liar and rant about Libertarians all being liars? Flawless logic! I didn't say anything about "Conservatives." First, they don't have a lot of representation in our legislature, or, if they do, they tend to vote with Republicans anyway. Second, your view of "Conservatives" is a big government one including an individual healthcare mandate and methods of people-control like smoking bans. I don't think most "Conservatives" share your big-government, anti-freedom view of "Conservative" principles. Most Conservatives would reject your views, so why would I talk about them here?

...What is wrong with you?

You're refusing to discuss the topic and, at the same time, accusing me of changing the subject?

You never attacked Libertarianism. All you did was make up fictional positions and values which have nothing to do with Libertarians and attacked them. I pointed this out and you never responded further--which makes sense, because all of the crap you made up was really bizarre.

This is inane. You're just making up random crap with every post and never responding to anything. You first post was all fictitious garbage. You abandoned all of it. Then you tried to claim Republicans have any objections to the Fed's robbery of the American people. You've now abandoned that ridiculous position as well. Now you're rambling vaguely about Libertarianism again, having not responded to anything I've said thus far.

Do you have ANYthing to say, or is this crying all you're going to do? You haven't defended a single thing in your initial post which I disputed, which was so ridiculous and baseless I couldn't read all of it. You might as well have rambled about Libertarian views of M-theory, for all the sense you made making up random Libertarian views and rambling about what you made up.

If I have to explain that Libertarian values are liberty and limited (lawful) government to anyone, they shouldn't be talking about Libertarian values; they should be looking up the Libertarian platform.

I'm not here to give anyone Wikipedia summarizations on a 6th grade reading level.

I think Spock is conceding

Ofc he won't wiki Conservatism or look up the true values of the TEA Party so his little fit is laughable.

And to think this all came about because he decides to lump all Republicans together with all Socialists. This smackdown on Libertarianism (I seriously laugh cause anyone reading this can see how Kemp is and are now pushed away from it) is because his attitude.

When asked to define and defend his principles he says "wiki it". What a joke.

kill 25% of military age males in a society and it goes blooey.   THAT is why Japan suddenly got nice nice, why Britain lost the Empah and why the Krauts suddenly decided beer and socialism was cooler than bigger tanks.

too bad we have a Pentagon that says we absolutely can't employ our military-industrial edge to slaughter guerrillas faster than they can breed, because, shut up that's why.

going into Libya for the Arab Spring Break is one guy's decision, not a matter of Republican policy.

technically both parties passed the War Powers Act which says the President can wage 90 days war on anybody, the Pope, the Queen of England, go for it, as long as Congress votes OK 90 days later.

The Supreme Court said in 1999 that if the President keeps bombing without Congressional OK, yawn.

Republican policy on the issue is basically, give Obama what he wants because if you deny him he'll proclaim himself King and then what can you do.

I did bring up the Barbary Pirates, which was something done by that radical servant of NWO Thomas Jefferson, because he wanted to serve the new world order of boats of crap for sale going all over without being pirated by nearby pirates.

Jefferson was never exactly the type that unabashedly adhered to the Constitution anyway.  Remember, during the Louisiana Purchase, Jefferson initially asked Congress for a Constitutional Amendment to grant the power to buy land (no, there is no power to do that), but when Napolean informed him that the "massive tract of land for pennies on the dollar" deal was a limited time offer, he threw the Constitution out the window and bought the property anyway.  Not saying it was wrong by any means.  But Jefferson, one of our founding fathers, had no problem outright ignoring the Constitution when there was a choice between adherence to the Constitution and getting a strong national benefit.  Translation: If the US always strictly adhered to the US Constitution, The Yell would probably be a Spanish citizen.

Nah I'd be a Comanchero.  Running between the lines, selling guns and rifles and liquor and stolen cattle.   Damning both sides. 

damn what am I doing here

I don't think protecting commerce or even a little strong-arm tactics is the same thing as occupying foreign nations where we have no national interests.

The Louisiana Purchase being a little less than legal is no reason to throw out the law. The law should be modified to allow for such extraordinary circumstances to be dealt with legally. Past infractions are not an excuse to become a nation of [corrupt] men, not laws. Being a nation of laws (and those laws protecting the liberty of its people) is what allowed the USA to become the richest nation on earth.

The law should have been amended to deal with his actions and anything similar that might happen in the future.

Good men can choose what's best for the nation in extraordinary circumstances, so long as they're held accountable afterwards. Obviously nobody today thinks the Louisiana Purchase had negative results for the nation.

That was an extraordinary circumstance. The everyday ignoring of the law today is as ordinary as anything. Jefferson was acting under extraordinary circumstances. The legislature should have made it legal via a treaty or some such legality, or otherwise approved/rejected his executive decision. In the absence of Congress's authority making it clearly legal/illegal, we have the mess of illegality discussed here.

And there are far less "good men" in politics today than at this nation's founding. I think we need to err far more on the side of the law today than ever before, especially when there's no extraordinary circumstances at all.

> Mister Spock wrote:

> The law should have been amended to deal with his actions and anything similar that might happen in the future.

Good men can choose what's best for the nation in extraordinary circumstances, so long as they're held accountable afterwards. Obviously nobody today thinks the Louisiana Purchase had negative results for the nation.

That was an extraordinary circumstance. The everyday ignoring of the law today is as ordinary as anything. Jefferson was acting under extraordinary circumstances. The legislature should have made it legal via a treaty or some such legality, or otherwise approved/rejected his executive decision. In the absence of Congress's authority making it clearly legal/illegal, we have the mess of illegality discussed here.

And there are far less "good men" in politics today than at this nation's founding. I think we need to err far more on the side of the law today than ever before, especially when there's no extraordinary circumstances at all.

No more questions.

*goes back to whatever he was doing*