Re: Mw Petition
1: ICD
2: Airwing
3: Anubis
4: sickness
5: Middle
6: tobias
7: Shadow
8: HydroP
9: James|sunstorm
10: Mizzle
11: XTC
12. Murderface
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Ideas → Mw Petition
1: ICD
2: Airwing
3: Anubis
4: sickness
5: Middle
6: tobias
7: Shadow
8: HydroP
9: James|sunstorm
10: Mizzle
11: XTC
12. Murderface
i like FDs thoughts i mentioned 8 man fams no allies
i think 1 draft per fam is ok then 2 people can team up.
if you have no drafts a lot of players will jist keep deleting till they land with people they know.
i think you should only allow 1 delete per round. otherwise people will delete. ive killed off over 20 players this round. thats a new personal best
> Tobes wrote:
> i like FDs thoughts i mentioned 8 man fams no allies
i think 1 draft per fam is ok then 2 people can team up.
if you have no drafts a lot of players will jist keep deleting till they land with people they know.
i think you should only allow 1 delete per round. otherwise people will delete. ive killed off over 20 players this round. thats a new personal best
Yea that is another important issue that needs to be addressed. Locking out the gal so people don't just keep deleting and randoming.
1: ICD
2: Airwing
3: Anubis
4: sickness
5: Middle
6: tobias
7: Shadow
8: HydroP
9: James|sunstorm
10: Mizzle
11: XTC
12. Murderface
13. Whitehadow IC Legend
no further vote needed
1: ICD
2: Airwing
3: Anubis
4: sickness
5: Middle
6: tobias
7: Shadow
8: HydroP
9: James|sunstorm
10: Mizzle
11: XTC
12. Murderface
13. Whitehadow IC Legend
14. Matthang
how about this:
2 fams, 60 players each. Round ends when it becomes apparent one of the two fams is too far behind to win size
F U Snailex! You couldn't copy/paste the list and add yourself? X(
> Oxygen wrote:
> how about this:
2 fams, 60 players each. Round ends when it becomes apparent one of the two fams is too far behind to win size
lmao that would certainly be different
Problem with small family size is effect of inactive joiners. Drafting would help circumvent that, but a fam of 6 with 3 inactives will be difficult to keep up with the rest.
How about a MW round where its a TOTAL draft no randoms. the rest get left out to PW n00bs
5 players total draft no randoms then no one can complain if you dumb enough to draft inactive player
> Arbolio3 wrote:
> Problem with small family size is effect of inactive joiners. Drafting would help circumvent that, but a fam of 6 with 3 inactives will be difficult to keep up with the rest.
then it will be like playing PW!
this should be moved to ideas now since its kidna just a running ideas thread ![]()
Moved to ideas.
> Tobes wrote:
> i like FDs thoughts i mentioned 8 man fams no allies
i think 1 draft per fam is ok then 2 people can team up.
if you have no drafts a lot of players will jist keep deleting till they land with people they know.
i think you should only allow 1 delete per round. otherwise people will delete. ive killed off over 20 players this round. thats a new personal best
It's like this every round Tobes... People delete until they hit a decent family!
How about we make it 8 players per family, 20 families - 1 delete before round starts. Once round starts , then if you delete you're out until galaxy reset. And as far as that goes, killed off is the same!
> WS IC Legend wrote:
> How about a MW round where its a TOTAL draft no randoms. the rest get left out to PW n00bs
5 players total draft no randoms then no one can complain if you dumb enough to draft inactive player
Ooooh... I like this idea - all active or someone isn't doing homework and has only themselves to blame!
1: ICD
2: Airwing
3: Anubis
4: sickness
5: Middle
6: tobias
7: Shadow
8: HydroP
9: James|sunstorm
10: Mizzle
11: XTC
12. Murderface
13. Whitehadow IC Legend
14. Matthang
15. Snailex
16. Galeonis
6 man teams would be good, preferably ALL random dont you think if its pure draft then there would be what at most 3 fams at the top? I dont mind struggling in small fams either
there are only 16 names on this list after all o_O
Or FDs suggestion with NO deletes (prevents delete abuse)
what about a 6 man round and right before the round starts, each family has a randomly assigned ally. yes its tougher to plan but that makes it interesting
The answer all along has been getting rid of PW, making one big gal w/ lots of fams and lots of ppl per fam (12+). Can still just keep a couple drafts. People will be less likely to delete and jump ship for another galaxy when there is no other galaxy to join.
If you start in a gal you shouldn't be allowed in the other gal till rounds over . Delete and you are forces to same gal
1: ICD
2: Airwing
3: Anubis
4: sickness
5: Middle
6: tobias
7: Shadow
8: HydroP
9: James|sunstorm
10: Mizzle
11: XTC
12. Murderface
13. Whitehadow IC Legend
14. Matthang
15. Snailex
16. Galeonis
17. Cwood
Let pw be all random..
For mw.. Why not close it and open capricorn or trilang...
Than do 6 man teams pre selected by leaders, no hc!
Get like 20-25 leaders, get them thoghether Find our who wants to play with who and see if we all succeed in making enoth fun fams.. There shouldnt be to much orgenisation with finding out who wants to play etc and who wants to team up.. We can do That in the forum
9 man fams, 1 draft each. That will really shake things up IMO
20 fams MAX, combine fams right before start so that no one is disadvantaged.
Imperial Forum → Ideas → Mw Petition
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.