Re: Nap breakers beware
plz post any fam that decides to break a nap on you because they will become immediate target even if we are napped with them.
Signed Legendary IC Terrorist & hater of nap breakers ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Nap breakers beware
plz post any fam that decides to break a nap on you because they will become immediate target even if we are napped with them.
Signed Legendary IC Terrorist & hater of nap breakers ![]()
Oh thank heavens ... what would we do without you oh mighty WS!?
38 just broke a CF, does that count?
hahaha
No a CF is not a nap haha but its still naughty
lol a cf should only be for an hour or two anyways lol tell ur vl to get that nap sorted:P
Well it is a nap in the sense that their leader signed it, but a certain mod doesn't agree with terms and is trying to void it and change terms on us.
are you counting cancelling naps there mr WS lol
are you counting cancelling naps there mr WS lol
Before this turns into a flamefest, let me be very explicit:
You are not getting those terms
Was I clear enough?
If you think it's just me go ahead and ask any other attacker in the family. They'll tell you the same.
If you want to continue fighting, by all means guys, let's get at it.
is it just me. or does this thread make no sense.
what terms. who is fighting.
Are you saying that the leader of 38 signed a nap (which makes it binding) and now other fam members are deciding to break the nap genesis?
Or is it simply a CF that was agreed until a nap could be signed later?
If its a nap signed then its a nap broken if not honored and thus I could not trust the nap with your fam that we have now since there is nothing that says it cant be broken later.
Also other fams would need to look at this also if they have a signed nap with your fam.
So a simple clarification on if you are actually going to BREAK a SIGNED nap is in order?
signed
IC Legendary Terrorist WS
They were given an offer that the majority of the family disagrees with, and were notified of it 5 minutes after it was sent.
If they want to believe they have a NAP that is their problem.
Week 27, 5Send Another MessageSave
72H NAP BETWEEN 6933 AND 6938
Standard Rules, no bs
-Family 6938 gets a 50 system core list
-Family 6933 gets a 25 system core list
-All core violations must be made available within 36 hours
Signed, Timmyville: 6938
Signed, Murderface #6933
Sent to Boom Boom of Jack of Spades (#6938)
I don't know about you guys but I need to break from naps from time to time, helps me get stuff done during the rest of the day
Yes Murder that's what you were told 5 minutes after was not acceptable.
Like I've been telling you for the past couple of hours. It's not like we're being unreasonable, you're just clinging to that because you know it's semi-favorable terms for you.
We'll be in chat if you want to negotiate a proper NAP though.
Well, not to be smart ass or anything but once again I simply asked if a nap was signed by your leader and it appears that it was by what you are saying.
Does it matter if it was signed for 1 second or 5 minutes or in our case for several days before its actually a nap?
Does IC have some sort of rules that says a signed nap is only good if its been signed for a certain amount of seconds, minutes, hours, days?
OR
Only if the majority of the fam agrees with it?
Or is it a nap when the elected leader signs it?
And if it is a nap when they leader signs it then its a nap break if its not honored PERIOD no ands ifs or butts.
In my opinion the leader needs to mark you all rogue if you decide not to accept a legal binding signed nap or delete to make sure his word is his word.
I dont care how you make an excuse or want to word it but if 33 can post in here a SIGNED nap by the leader of 38 then its a freaking nap and nothing can be done about but BUT accept it or be a nap BREAKER in which case I personally will consider the nap with 38 subject to only being valid until we decide its in our best interest to BREAK it and I am sure you would not think we broke nap then Correct?
If you want to get technical, it's only official once it's signed ingame. That's why ingame NAPs were introduced.
It's not our intention to break anything, we are simply telling them that was a rushed deal and we are not going to take it Period.
However, we are available to negotiate further and settle for good terms for everyone. We are acting in good faith, and haven't landed a single fleet since talks started.
If you think that's breaking a NAP, ok I guess.
So yes or no only please so I can inform my fam.
Since 38 and 30 have only a signed nap NOT an ingame nap are you saying we DO or DO NOT have a nap?
Please just a yes we do or no we do not?
and if we do NOT have one then oh well time to make different plans then
Week 26, 3Reply Save
72H NAP between families 6938 and 6930
Standard Rules, no BS
50 system cores each
Signed, Timmyville: 6738
Signed, Boom Boom of Jack of Spades (#6938)
Signed, Middle: 6730
Sent to Boom Boom of Jack of Spades (#6938)
Dude! If the the nap has been signed by both leaders, (and it sure looks that way by the posting)sux it up and live with it
Doesn't matter if you like the agreement or not its been signed
Anything you do from this point will be nap breaking, and dishonourable
gotta love naps getting signed in universal news.
why not do this ingame
OK Genesis ![]()
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Nap breakers beware
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.