> Einstein wrote:

> Ah yeah so you admit that global warming and climate change theories are a bunch of hocus pocus since there is ample evidence of nature doing things on her own without human interference?

You need to retake science and math courses.  Just because event A affects event X, doesn't mean event B can't affect it either. 

If you've ever looked at a graph for CO2 and Methane emissions - both naturally emitted by this earth - there is a natural oscillation.  Then comes the industrialization of Britain and America.  The graph exponentially increases way past where peaks occurred in the past.

How do they know how much CO2 and Methane was in the air 4 million years ago?  Ice cores and dead material in the bottom of lakes.  They check "parts per million" in a dated portion of their sample (carbon dated or other extreme methods).

The graphs clearly show a correlation between human activity and an abnormal increase in global warming that this earth has never seen before.
These thus lead to theories about human impact.  It is very real.

Nothing to do with this thread though but I jumped on the bandwagon.

> Einstein wrote:

> Correlation? There is a tighter correlation with the suns magnetic field and the result on cosmic radiation! The correlation of CO2 and the rise is not even really accurate to say, it's not a full correlation, and there has been significant CO2 events in the past, and significant heating periods in the past.

This year also points at a failure of the global warming 'theory' which shows it IS the Sun which is the result of our issues. The utter end of Solar Activity, the significant decline of it's magnetic push, and the dramatic increase in cosmic radiation, cloud formation, rain clouds, and drop in tempatures across most of Earth is the exact evidence to put a stake in the heart of global warming.

You fail to explain the exponential amount of CO2 and methane in our atmosphere which is notably greater than anything this earth has had in its past.

And what happens when there is excess gas in the atmosphere?  It traps energy from the sun that would otherwise deflect off the earth.  Thus:

sun + gas = global warming

So Einstein's logic is that

Clouds deflect radiation

More radiation will cause more evaporation, and therefore more clouds.
With more clouds the safer we will be from the sun.

I'm sorry but that logic, while valid, has false premises.

And you have yet to explain the exponential increase in the gases aforementioned.  Grats on avoiding the argument.