1 (edited by Xeno 13-Dec-2012 11:14:59)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

NOPE.


They DON'T serve a day in the slammer.  WHY THE &^%* NOT????????

They let HSBC crooks go with a slap on the wrist.  The fine is a faction of the money they 'make' - or perhaps 'steal' is a better word for it - in interest payments our governments pay them with OUR taxdollars, forking the bill for the absurdity of our 'elected' officials who run budget deficits, again, and again, and again, and again - maybe because their buddies work at the banks - and raise taxes on the poor and middle class rather than the rich????

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/12/10/hsbc-bank-ap.html?cmp=rss

And they want to fine chronically under / unemployed uni grads $5000 / pop for 'illegal' downloading, most of whom WILL probably serve jailtime because they can't afford to pay the fines~!  I mean, they can't afford rent, let alone cable, hence the downloading, twits.

WTF~!???

And Einstein.  Why are you the only one starting threads?

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

Because they're more important than you

MF Global STOLE $1.2 Billion out of customer accounts, transferred it into company accounts and then spent it.  That's a deliberate act.  It didn't seep out like water in a leaky tank.  Somebody deliberately MOVED the money.  But the FBI says, ah, well, whaddya gonna do, yawn.  Nobody will be charged.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

I'm sure its coincidence that the head of MF Global, Jon Corzine, was United States Senator from NJ and former Gov. of NJ.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

From the article...

"In January, HSBC hired Stuart Levey, a former Treasury undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, as its chief legal officer. And a former policy adviser in the Obama administration, Preeta Bansal, in October became HSBC's global general counsel for litigation and regulatory affairs."

This wasn't theft - it was finding new sources of revenue.  Just like what our government is proposing to 'fix' the fiscal cliff.  Nothing to see here - move on.

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

> BeoWolfe wrote:

> From the article...

"In January, HSBC hired Stuart Levey, a former Treasury undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, as its chief legal officer. And a former policy adviser in the Obama administration, Preeta Bansal, in October became HSBC's global general counsel for litigation and regulatory affairs."

This wasn't theft - it was finding new sources of revenue.  Just like what our government is proposing to 'fix' the fiscal cliff.  Nothing to see here - move on.

OMG are people's sense of ethics so askew that you see no conflict of interest here, that having such close affiliation of government and the financial system is asking for abuse.

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

I think he was being hella sarcastic.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

Let's see....

These people donated to Obama. That's why no jail.

Now if they were the Koch Brothers or Murdoch...

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

If you can't afford rent or cable, maybe consider getting a job.

Oh look, people with money getting away with things. These are the same people you want to give dictatorial powers and control of wages to. Go figure.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

Sorry Xeno -  you kinda missed my point, of course its theft when someone takes someone else's money - the irony is the Government calls find new ways of skimming money from peoples checks "Revenue increases" where as anyone with an iota of common sense reconises it as theft.

10 (edited by Xeno 16-Dec-2012 08:53:11)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

> BeoWolfe wrote:

> Sorry Xeno -  you kinda missed my point, of course its theft when someone takes someone else's money - the irony is the Government calls find new ways of skimming money from peoples checks "Revenue increases" where as anyone with an iota of common sense reconises it as theft.

Yes, I missed the sarcasm.  I thought you were the sort of person who defends the transnational corps and governments from the poor and middle class which try to abuse the legal system to get money, rights, and some funny thing called dignity from them.

11 (edited by V. Kemp 16-Dec-2012 17:38:33)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

"Outrageous HSBC Settlement Proves the Drug War is a Joke"
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/outrageous-hsbc-settlement-proves-the-drug-war-is-a-joke-20121213

As always, Xeno's accusations are vague and meaningless. Banks are withholding dignity from the middle class? Could you outline more specifically how they manage that? Banks are withholding rights from people? What rights do people have that require banks' involvement? How are banks denying people's rights? And why do banks owe people money?

You're not arguing against the Fed and actual theft, you're just ranting vaguely because you feel entitled and nobody is taking care of you.

That these criminals are not being prosecuted in the least (slight delay on bonuses, ohnoes!) is a problem of government corruption. This story in no way involves banks infringing on middle class rights or stealing from them.

By the way, in your OP, you said something about government raising "taxes on the poor and middle class rather than the rich." We have a graduated/progressive tax system. The rich pay the vast majority of taxes in the USA. The notion that the poor are being overtaxed as a means of exploitation by the rich is laughable and absurd. Again you have to be extremely vague to even make the claim, and your accusations are completely baseless.

This isn't my opinion. This is basic math.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

12 (edited by Xeno 16-Dec-2012 18:40:47)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

"The notion that the poor are being overtaxed as a means of exploitation by the rich is laughable and absurd."

Same old Kemp.  I don't have to qualify my statements to you.  I will not participate in any arguments with you, Kemp, because you bludgeon people with whom you debate with personal attacks, innuendo, derailment of topics, accusations, intentionally inflammatory comments, trolling, disingenuous content, and, above all bad intent.  You, Kemp, are not here to listen, learn, teach, discuss and thus solve problems.  You are here to beat others into submission with your views; you are here to win by destroying others.  In the process, you violate people's right to free speech, and create a dysfunctional environment in this politics forum. 

If you give a @#$% about liberty and freedom, go and discover them for yourself.

It's been fun watching you, Kemp, being so utterly wrong about virtually everything.  You have no idea that you have no leg to stand re virtually all of your opinions.  You have no notion that the point of debating is learning from others, gleaning information and knowledge through debate so as to adjust your knowledge paradigm accordingly.  This notion simply isn't a part of your intellectual framework.  There's no point in discussing anything with you.  And this very response to you has been the biggest waste of time, since, perhaps, the last time I responded to you on this forum, however many months ago it was.

You need, the WORLD needs, an about-face away from your way of thinking, Kemp, or the human race is doomed to eventually destroy itself.

13 (edited by V. Kemp 16-Dec-2012 19:32:34)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

Where did I do any of that above?

While you don't "have" to qualify any statements to me (obviously), you do have to qualify statements if you don't want to be incoherent when posting to a forum. So long as your statements are meaninglessly vague and often factually inaccurate, some amount of explanation is required in order to avoid seeming absolutely psychotic.

Your over-the-top "beat others into submission" language is just a smokescreen to distract from the fact that I raise legitimate questions and you absolutely refuse to respond to them in any way. You neither answer them nor offer an explanation of how they are illegitimate. You vaguely cry that they violate your free speech. You vaguely cry that they're ad-hominem attacks when they only attack your arguments. Your condemnation here is as vague and meaningless as everything else you post.

If you cannot stand behind what you post, why post it? If you cannot be more specific than completely meaningless vague ramblings, why post it?

For instance, you posted that this story somehow involves banks violating people's rights and withholding money from people. I asked how banks violate people's rights and why they should be giving money to people. You decline to respond in any way to these simple and legitimate questions. As you always do.

There's nothing anti-free speech about asking for clarification of what point ramblings are supposed to make. There's nothing disingenuous in pointing out factual inaccuracies.

If I'm so wrong about virtually everything, why haven't you ever engaged me on ideas rather than this vague rambling and accusations? I don't mean to be personal, but you seem positively psychotic. You literally don't make any sense, and you literally ignore 100% of thought posted in response to your ideas. _That's_ dysfunctional.




This is why I mock our moderators. I don't believe you're psychotic. I believe you're trolling. In any event, that they allow either to spam this forum is embarrassing.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

14 (edited by Xeno 17-Dec-2012 20:51:45)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

Bank Guy:  Yeah, we broke the law, and made lots of money by aiding criminals and terrorists.
Gov. Guy:  That's okay, just pay us money.
Bank Guy: Okay. Here you go....  By the way, we're raising interest rates on your national debt because we're downgrading your credit rating.
Gov. Guy: Okay.

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

You don't know the difference between huge banks and credit rating agencies. Please, give us your opinions.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

16 (edited by Xeno 18-Dec-2012 00:58:32)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

Banks, credit rating agencies, all part of the same problem: intentional and unwitting collusion with an inherently morally and cognitively defunct system.

read:

http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/33-2/507.pdf



My opinion on all matters of justice, politics, academics, etc., can be summed up by this:

We need moral rating agencies to rate each other first and foremost in a transparent and open manner to qualify or accredit them to then provide moral ratings on other facets of our civilization, be they banks (whether they are governmental or private), corporations, credit rating agencies, public officials, social services, politicians and other public officials, products and services, industries, etc..  The purpose of it would be to empower individuals to make informed moral choices, including how and where to live, how and in what career to work, how to vote, what company to buy from, which university to attend, which charity or religious organization to support, which stock to buy, etc, etc., etc.. -  in essence to empower individuals to improve their own individual moral 'footprint' or rating.

We have had credit rating agencies for decades, centuries?  Now we have environmental rating agencies, corruption rating agencies - all to no avail because what we really need is a rating agency that takes moral implications into account as well.

If there are to be no moral rating agencies providing individuals an opportunity to improve the effects their choices have on the rest of humanity, humanity is doomed to repeat its mistakes in history.  Yet, due to humanity's capacity to destroy itself, human civilization can no longer afford to repeat its mistakes in history. We as a species are in a dilemma in this regard.  I believe moral rating agencies are necessary to solve the systemic deficiencies that have caused the horrific events of the past, and give humanity a an opportunity to not destroy itself in the future.

The world needs an Association for the Accreditation of Independent Moral Rating Agencies.

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

If this was a romantic comedy, Xeno and Spock would be getting married soon smile


Xeno wrote:

"The notion that the poor are being overtaxed as a means of exploitation by the rich is laughable and absurd."

Same old Kemp.  I don't have to qualify my statements to you.  I will not participate in any arguments with you, Kemp, because you bludgeon people with whom you debate with personal attacks, innuendo, derailment of topics, accusations, intentionally inflammatory comments, trolling, disingenuous content, and, above all bad intent.

Erm... no, here he states a well known fact.  The more you make the higher your tax bracket and most middle to lower class pay ZERO taxes.  This is fact, this is not "personal attacks, innuendo, derailment of topics, accusations, intentionally inflammatory comments, trolling, disingenuous content, and, above all bad intent."  Your response to him stating this fact is very much all of the above.

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

leave those bankers alone they're innocent they didn't know any better all they did was make some money!

qsudifhkqsdhfmsklfhjqmlsdfhjqkmsldfhjmqklsfhmqlsfhjqmsklfhqmskjdfhqsfq
sdffdgjfhjdfhgjhsfsdfqgsbsthzgflqkcgjhkgfjnbkmzghkmqrghqmskdghqkmsghnvhdf
qmkjghqmksdjqlskhqkmsdhqmskfhjqmskjdfhqkmsdfjhqmskfhjqkmsjdfhqkm
sjfhqkmsjfhqkmsjfhkqmjsfhqksdjmfhqksjfhqskjdfhnbwfjgqreutyhaerithgfqsd
kjnqsdfqsdfqsdfmkjqhgmkjnqsgkjmhzdflmghjsmdlghjsmdkghmqksdjghq

19 (edited by V. Kemp 18-Dec-2012 23:06:01)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

Xeno,

You spoke as if banks and credit rating agencies are the same organizations with the same people. They are not. And free people can choose to use/value different credit agencies differently (or not at all), which is a check on credit agencies being controlled by banks. The check is free people not being idiots. Unfortunately, no one has found a safeguard for people being idiots yet. But this isn't a problem with the system, because banks and credit rating agencies are not the same thing. Until you acknowledge that they're not the same organizations/people or otherwise demonstrate any knowledge whatsoever of the topic, nobody's going to care what you think.

I would completely agree that the Fed is robbing the poor and middle class, but you're not making that argument. I would completely agree that government (which ultimately controls the fed) and private banks (which control the fed) are robbing the poor, but you're not making that argument.

As always it's just incoherent psychobable/trolling void of any real point or response to a single thing I or anyone else has said.

Moral rating agencies? I'm not going to read this trolling. It's another half-cocked idea like "give power to a dictator and he'll sort it all out." It's not a real idea or opinion. It's ridiculous and stupid. Yes, I said that trusting a dictator (or dictator-like agency) to solve problems given massive power is stupid, juvenile, and a not serious opinion. It's the sort of thing a psychopath or child who hasn't thought about it for more than 2 seconds posts, or it's trolling.

We have elections to guard against crappy people in power. But democracy is only as powerful a tool to rid us of corruption as the people are aware and not stupid. You can't protect the people from the idiots they freely elect by taking away democratic power from them--this just strengthens the idiots they elected whom you're trying to protect them from.

As always, I've slaughtered you on content and you've trolled the forum and embarrassed the moderators. Continue!

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

20 (edited by Xeno 19-Dec-2012 00:54:13)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

Kemp, you are a lost cause.  Trusting "dictators" is what got us into the mess in the first place, and being blind to the fact that they were (and still are) dictators helped, too.

An association of independent moral rating agencies would be anything but dictatorial.  It would be the opposite: they would facilitate diverse groups of people to work together to audit each others' research and findings - a far cry from the dictatorial draconianism running rampant on Wallstreet, government regulators, and a morally debauched, useless, academic establishment.  You naively lap the the notion that they are legitimate and function as they are supposed to, even when historical facts and even current events point to the contrary.

I mean, I used their own bloody source, and you still don't see it.

"You spoke as if banks and credit rating agencies are the same organizations with the same people. "

They are the same people: the same sorts of ways of thinking (or should I say brainwashing); people who attended the same sorts of schools; who go to the same sorts of restaurants; who have the same sorts of hobbies; live the same lifestyles and associate with people just like them; people who wear the same sorts of cloths; live in the same sorts of neighborhoods; and who rotate around from one position in one company / organization / bank / government position one administration to the next, be it at a rating agency or a bank or a trans-national corporation, etc.  Do you really think there is any difference in the way people think in that crowd?  They CAN'T think differently, because they are the same, and share the same moral values, which is what resulted in the systemic folly which was the financial crisis.  Their homogeneity resulted in consensus in folly, and they are still there.   

You're a lost cause, insulting, accusatory, in your willful ignorant, naivety.

@Beowolfe
" The more you make the higher your tax bracket and most middle to lower class pay ZERO taxes.  This is fact, this is not "personal attacks, innuendo, derailment of topics, accusations, intentionally inflammatory comments, trolling, disingenuous content, and, above all bad intent."  Your response to him stating this fact is very much all of the above."

And a response to how this was not true was not justified because of his insult, accusation, inflammatory comments, etc.  Why should I school him?  He couldn't pay me enough to set him straight.  He doesn't want to be set straight, because he is an ideologue, like Einstein, plain and simple.

I have said how his statement is not a fact many times, only to be ignored, it seems, as it just doesn't compute with people who buy into ideologues' mindsets.  The irony is that the nature of the dictatorship is apparent to the free, but oblivious to the oppressed.  Those profiting or well-adjusted and comfortable inside the dictatorship will make apologetic arguments for it, at the expense of the liberty of others and themselves, and then accuses anyone who aims to teach and to reveal the dictatorship for what it is as having dictatorial aspirations.  It's absolutely absurd!

Carbon taxes, sales taxes, fees, inflation, cost of basic living, cost of basic goods and services, cost of education and health care, are all forms of taxation which are borne more so by the poor than the rich; environmental pollution, crime, lack of social justice and the effects thereof and the damages incurred by them are other forms of taxation which are borne more by the poor and middle class than by the rich.  And when you see how taxes are used to suit the interests of firstly the rich who claim to pay most of the taxes, rather than the poor and middle class who ACTUALLY pay MORE when all is considered, you can see that it is the poor and middle class are the ones getting shafted BY the rich.  Taxes should be seen as a penalty to charge the rich for disproportionately profiteering off an inherently unjust civilization, and those taxes should be used to remedy the system to make it more equitable and to solve the systemic injustice rampant in it, however, it is controlled by people who clearly will stop at no lengths to undermine the values of liberal democracy to suit their own interests any chance they get.



   
This thread was about how multi-national banks were (and probably still are) laundering money for drug cartels and terrorists in plain daylight, and how all they get is a slap-on-the-wrist charge that they can make up by raising interest rates on national debts, and all I get for my contribution for a PLAIN AS DAY explanation for the root causes and a viable solution to remedy the situation is ridicule, insult, accusations.  I'd really like to give up, but can't, because I can't stop caring.

Why don't you?

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

"You naively lap the the notion that they are legitimate and function as they are supposed to, even when historical facts and even current events point to the contrary."

No, government has messed them up royally too. My point is that you are naively presume some quasi "independent" moral rating agencies would accomplish anything. How would they be independent? Wouldn't government have to create them, staff them, and give them power in order to accomplish anything?

What are you even talking about? You're extremely vague.

" They CAN'T think differently, because they are the same, and share the same moral values, which is what resulted in the systemic folly which was the financial crisis.  Their homogeneity resulted in consensus in folly, and they are still there. "

Government caused the crisis. You know nothing about the subject. The race or lifestyles of bankers didn't cause the crisis. Their hobbies didn't cause the crisis. Free markets didn't cause the crisis. Government did.

" And when you see how taxes are used to suit the interests of firstly the rich who claim to pay most of the taxes, rather than the poor and middle class who ACTUALLY pay MORE when all is considered...."

Care to back up or explain that statement in any way? Obviously not, because you can't, because it's a lie.

" you can see that it is the poor and middle class are the ones getting shafted BY the rich. "

I'm getting shafted by government. Why do you hate the successful so much? Life is not a zero-sum game. My buying a car doesn't hurt you. I didn't steal anything I have from you. Why all the vague hatred for the rich? We know who inflates our currency: government and private banks (via the fed, via government authority). Yet you vaguely ramble about "the rich" as if any action taken in regard to them effects the government/fed corruption which actually robs us.

"Taxes should be seen as a penalty to charge the rich for disproportionately profiteering off an inherently unjust civilization..."

Do you mean unjust because it's free or because it's not as free as it should be?

"and those taxes should be used to remedy the system to make it more equitable and to solve the systemic injustice rampant in it...."

Oh you mean it's unjust because it's too free, and people should share in the rewards of labor equally regardless of their contribution. That's an idea called communism, by the way. It's been thought of before. It results in horrible human rights abuses and people becoming far less productive, resulting in high prices, shortages, and horrible standards of living for all.

"and all I get for my contribution for a PLAIN AS DAY explanation for the root causes and a viable solution to remedy the situation is ridicule...."

You vaguely ranted that banks owe the public money and violate people's rights. I simply asked what you were alleging, specifically, because it was unrelated to the HSBC topic. You've now explained that they function in somewhat free markets and you hate that, but it still doesn't relate to HSBC. You were rambling about something unrelated to the government corruption which let HSBC get away with serious crimes.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

22 (edited by Xeno 20-Dec-2012 01:29:09)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

Lol.  Before the HSBC story fades from the minute collective attention span of the media, we get this:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/12/19/ubs-bank-fraud-fine.html

Manipulating GLOBAL interest rates?  Seriously?  And they get fined by whom?  Will the people who suffer the effects of these banker's crimes see any of that money?  The injustice of it is that it is a crime against ALL of us, especially the honest poor and middle class suffer the most by these crooks.

@ Kemp....

I don't like discussing things with you.  I find you to be an insulting intellectual bully, and would really wish you'd just stop addressing me.

"" And when you see how taxes are used to suit the interests of firstly the rich who claim to pay most of the taxes, rather than the poor and middle class who ACTUALLY pay MORE when all is considered...."

Care to back up or explain that statement in any way? Obviously not, because you can't, because it's a lie."

It is clear, Kemp, that you don't care about freedom, liberty, justice, etc..., else you would learn about the issues yourself to see how it might be correct. Again, you couldn't pay me enough to sort you out.

Take any product: gas, housing - if it is subsidized, or if it is taxed, and if it is the same price for the rich as it is for the poor, it is, in effect, a disproportionate tax on the poor.  THINK ABOUT IT.  USE YOUR GREY MATTER, KEMP.

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

my last post on this forum:

The two tools of the elite used to exploit the poor and middle class and undermine the values that people of liberal democratic nations the world over hold dear to their hearts: cheap credit and inflation.  Our leaders need to understand the effects this has on regular people the world over, and work to reverse the effects.  It's not right.  It's just not right.

/xeno signs off permanently.

24 (edited by V. Kemp 20-Dec-2012 12:34:07)

Re: HSBC moneylaunders serve jailtime

"I don't like discussing things with you."

You've never discussed anything with me. By implying that you have, you make yourself a liar. You've never responded to the content of anything I've ever said.

If you were to make some sort of argument that the money the rich pay in taxes (which is the majority of taxes payed) is ultimately produced by and taxed from the working, I could certainly respect that sort of argument. But the fact is, you've literally never attempted to make any such argument. You're all hot air and insults. You insult me. You insult everyone's intelligence by pretending that I should give you credit for arguments that you've never made or even hinted you wish to make.

"Take any product: gas, housing - if it is subsidized, or if it is taxed, and if it is the same price for the rich as it is for the poor, it is, in effect, a disproportionate tax on the poor. "

That everyone generally needs food, shelter, heat, and a few other things to live does not equal these things being "taxes." Seriously, this is basic English language skills you're lacking here, and if you want to argue that needs are inherently "taxes" with some bizarre reasoning, you should at least argue that case before insulting anyone because they don't share whatever view it is--never explained here--that you hold.

Thanks for your second last post. I've been arguing against the Fed for years. It's the source of inflation of the US dollar. You never speak about it. Do you know anything about it? How can you champion the cause against banksters stealing from the middle class via inflation (then deflation) w/o even knowing what the fed is!?

[I wish I could obey forum rules]