• Posts: 865

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

Well do apologies mean nothing then? Did I come in the forum saying 'we broke NAP with pride'? Do you remember what we did with the LWK Space guy? It's not so much what happens that matters, it's how you deal with it.

All I can see is, nothing's changed in your fam. If it's still the majority stopping a leader change, then what are we supposed to think about that?

And I don't think I accused *all* players of that 38 deal. I accused Noir, AW, you. Cuz you three as well as Jag earlier and some others have always pulled the strings in 41.

Are you going to tell me you didn't agree with the deal with 38? Or the raid early round? Well sorry, then. I just don't buy it.

I'm on fire!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,428

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

read my post again did you see any word about raid?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 865

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

Well then, if you agreed with the raid, regardless of what happened with 38, you're still one of the people responsible for the move early round. Hence, I ain't backing off.

I'm on fire!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,940
  • Tag points: 91

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

Talic is on fire! big_smile

Immigrants make a difference
We are all immigrants
We all make a difference
How are we all immigrants?
- Our souls are not from here

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

305 Reply by

  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

- People in my fam are worried about 41 raiding. I have a convo with Airwing. He says he doesn't want to expo raid anyone. It destroys the game and is a shit move. Anyone can raid another fam in expo phase. He goes on to say he wants to extend the agreement into a NAP. I figured that was because they'd gotten into a pretty big expo war with 38. Makes sense to me. But, we already had our one NAP that we wanted. And AW isn't one to turn 180

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,428

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

Ok Talic, i leave forum to you again. you can keep whining about raid.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

307 Reply by Babe

  • Babe
  • Babe
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 3,292
  • Tag points: 9

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

fact is impire sent raid first  but failed.....i i still stand by what i said about early raids talic. And i agree we played abit shady for awhile there.  But u guys sent raid first.u guys refused to make our agreement into a NAP witch was the whole idea of the border agreement...

Airwing

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,190
  • Tag points: 1699

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

Talic wrote:

- People in my fam are worried about 41 raiding. I have a convo with Airwing. He says he doesn't want to expo raid anyone. It destroys the game and is a shit move. Anyone can raid another fam in expo phase. He goes on to say he wants to extend the agreement into a NAP. I figured that was because they'd gotten into a pretty big expo war with 38. Makes sense to me. But, we already had our one NAP that we wanted. And AW isn't one to turn 180

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

your all gays and shemales

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 960
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

FYI as long as I was in 41, me and broker didn't have any part in diplo. Sure everytime there was a situation, we all gave our input, but it was the leadership who made the final decision. And speaking for myself, almost all of our early round decisions went against my personal input.
The nap with 38 was against my input
The nap with 46 was against my input
Killing nightwalker without talking to him first was against my input


That being said I stand by the decisions the leadership took. There was nothing wrong or dishonorable about any of them except maybe killing NW without talking to him first. He can claim whatever he likes but he was largely inactive, often logging in once in 2 days and I can understand why AW didnt want to wait and talk to him before killing him off as we couldn't know how many days it would be before he logged in next. Also as far as I know, after I left, It was Stan and Noir leading. Not broker, not AW.

Its also funny how 46 have been claiming the raid was somehow a breach of agreement in this thread for a week and only now does Talic see fit to dispel that illusion.

So Talic and 46 can slander all they want to make themselves feel better... it always happens in IC and its part of human nature. People will always make up negative stuff about their opponents to make themselves feel self-righteous if they are winning and to have an excuse when they are losing.

For as long as I played this round, all of us in 41 had a blast with war after war and ceaseless conflicts as opposed to the general ongoing theme of imperial infra to win rounds these days. We managed to come out on top in each of our conflicts even in the ones where we had a clear eco disadvantage. I just hope the 41 members remember the first half of the round and not the 2nd.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,047
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

its been many round since i was in a  big active fam, and all the other rounds i was usually in small fams and other familys expo raided my fam cause we where small, and usually we got farmed war after war for the entire round in some rounds, expo raids happen all the time in this game, and our conflict with u guys was kill or be killed from what i could see, and the pure reason of us raiding u guys was because u wouldnt accept nap so we made u accept one, also how is it a expo raid if we had already been in a full on war, maby if u werent trying to just infra whore and built some defense it wouldnt have been sucsussfull, you guys could have solved this entire problem by just giving us a expo nap that lasted 2 weeks or what ever u guys liked, and by refusing a nap it looked like to us u where gonna raid us, also if one of your attackers sent out raid fleets befor we did, then dont u think we seen that from infills and sent all our attackers fleets out back at u because of that, also i only just knew u guys tried to raid us first from post in here, and i dont see any problem with what our fam did but if AW had said we werent gona raid u guys then we should never have attacked you, but now i see u guys sent fleets first so in my opinion what ever he said would be void if you where trying to raid us first,

any way im not taking any of this to heart cause ive had allot worse rounds than just being farmed at the end of round when the player who had all our savings got blocked and we have nothing to fight back with, all well who really cares ??? cause it dont bother me smile

gilmour999

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,256
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

Its ok Gilly, you can random in with us next round to play with some nice guys!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,647
  • Tag points: 141

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

Hmmm lots of things in this hmmm "huge" war and offcourse fams should take what they "want" etc.

I do have the idea tho and rumors state it that somewhere there is a border , a edge  of when it becomes one big farming fest.

I do not know all people involved in this, personally, but i doubt most want to slaughter a fam till they are deleting or shine from inactiviness. I dont see the honor in that

~" Peace can only grow where blood flows "~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

314 Reply by Babe

  • Babe
  • Babe
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 3,292
  • Tag points: 9

Re: 41 vs 46 Final War

it isnt over yet!

Airwing

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

Posts: 301 to 314 of 314

Pages Previous 1 … 11 12 13

You must login or register to post a reply

Imperial Forum → Universal News → 41 vs 46 Final War