• Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

Our relations with 6740 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 41 weeks.

guys this is a joke. we were farmed by 40 earlier in the round and we paid planets and got raided for 200 planets and now there trying one final grab

it should have been pnap and we agreed pnap but they "accidentley" signed a 48 hour nap

this is a complete joke.

im asking for mods to step in and stop this violation of IC code and rules

40 are a disgrace and have been the stand out wankers of this round.

mods please tell me what your going to do

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,256
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

Doesn't it look like everyone cancelled on them?  Not sure you'll have anything to worry about.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

they only cancelled on the small fams. its a joke

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 40 vs 43

so they cancelled? and it wasnt other fams that cancelled on them? lol

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

yer

40 think there smart they cancelled on 43, 42 and 45 the 3 smallest fams in the gal.

40 also cancelled on 38 as a smoke shield. 38 are too big to attack 40 without dropping NW so there will be no aggressive attacks from 40 on 38 as they would get pawned

40 will try raid the bottom 3 fams for the size win knowing its a cheap farming trick to try win the round

but we agreed pnap and have already paid 200+ planets

something needs to be done about 40

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 40 vs 43

Tobes. how sure are u they cancelled on 43,42 and 45? Cjay92 says they got cancelled upon by those 3 fams.

and i assure u that 38 cancelled on them. not the other way round. are u speaking out from your ass?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

im 100% sure

i didnt cancel on 40 as im the leader of 43 and i put a pnap in place but 40 "accidentaly" signed a 48 hour nap

ive spoke with the leader of 42 and they also did not cancel on 40

why would the bottom 3 fams with 1/3rd of the NW of 40 cancel on 40 with no hope of winning?

they wouldnt dude come on

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

8 Reply by dRaGoNsUP (edited by HF 23-Nov-2012 11:35:12)

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 40 vs 43

well cause i am from 38 and u said they cancelled on us.

if they didnt cancel on 40 then i assure u we will do smth about it

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,366

Re: 40 vs 43

i didnt know a shit

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

i dont know if 40 cancelled on 38 or if 38 cancelled on 40 for definate

but either way 40 cancelled on the bottom 3 fams

and 38 are too big to attack 40 so it dosnt make sence 38 cancelling on 40

40 no doubt cancelled on 38 knowing 38 couldnt attack 40 so 40 dont look so low but really its just a smoke screen

the only other logical answer is 38 did cancel on 40 and 40 cancelled on the bottom 3 fams to cover compensation for 38

this is just a low move by 40. really poor

so HF your in 38 and you didnt cancel on 40?

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 865

Re: 40 vs 43

IC Death was the one screaming about how horrible 46's cancellation on 41 was. Now Noir is blocked, kind of proving the points I made in that thread.

I hate people with double standards. Hopefully somehow, 38 can get in range and wreck 40. They bloody well deserve it every bit as much as 41.

I'm on fire!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 40 vs 43

read my 6th post.

38 cancelled on them.

and we have a 62mil nw attacker thats why we are so big. why does it not make sense for us to attack them?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,940
  • Tag points: 91

Re: 40 vs 43

I've been talking with some of the ppl who got canceled on. Did 40 really cancel a pnap they made and that was accidentally signed as a 48h nap...?

If so thats really lame... Tell me it ain't so Donald?

Immigrants make a difference
We are all immigrants
We all make a difference
How are we all immigrants?
- Our souls are not from here

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

well this makes more sence, 40 cancelled on the bottom 3 fams to cover the loss from 38.

i guess smart from 40 but they broke the pnap with 43 which they knew was in place.

i dont know what naps were in place with 42 and 45 but ill find out 100% what was agreed there but for sure 40 cancelled a verbal pnap agreement with 43

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 40 vs 43

Sol, they alr broke a NAP which they said was the fault of the other fam for not signing it officially even though planets were placed.

So whats stopping them from actually cancelling a 48hr nap when it was supposed to be PERM?

ICD should be farmed to death

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,686
  • Tag points: 112

Re: 40 vs 43

The family in question should have pushed to have the perm nap signed ingame, they didn't then had there nap canceled, seems like there own fault to me

Watch out Banana, its pedo bear !!!!!! =O

[18:19] <Nick> i would be the best homosexual ever

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 865

Re: 40 vs 43

InSaNe, ever heard of "reason", "decency" and "honour"? ICD has none of it, otherwise he'd never have cancelled, knowing full well it was a PNAP.

I'm on fire!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 493

Re: 40 vs 43

Well I dont really mind them cancelling the nap, we got nothing to loose this round coming from the bottom...
we had a good and fair war against 39 with 300 planets gained. I consider that an acomplishment. loosing against 40 wouldnt mean anything since they cancelled a nap, wich should have been permanent. this leaves us in very bad shape with loads of shares in oure cores...

get it on! I'll fight you untill my last transporter is shot down..:p

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

yer im going to fight this BS 40 have shit on a lot of people and i hope they dont come out on top of this there real low play has spoilt the fun for many gamers

insane as a mod you should be setting a good positive example of leadership, gamesmanship, knowledge and honour and saying its the other fams fault is a very poor judgement on your half, shame on you.

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

20 Reply by (edited by 23-Nov-2012 15:53:45)

  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 783
  • Tag points: 25

Re: 40 vs 43

Seems like donald will avoid this forum post.

*edit*
Also, we were in last when I joined in this round, I kicked this fam in the ass and brought us up from the ashes, I spose if ICD wants to take our planets he'll have to fight for them.

Friend is a four letter word.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,686
  • Tag points: 112

Re: 40 vs 43

Tobes wrote:

yer im going to fight this BS 40 have shit on a lot of people and i hope they dont come out on top of this there real low play has spoilt the fun for many gamers

insane as a mod you should be setting a good positive example of leadership, gamesmanship, knowledge and honour and saying its the other fams fault is a very poor judgement on your half, shame on you.

Tifus it always amazes me that people will happily leave things like this rather than push for the nap to be made permanent ingame as original arranged.

The ingame nap system was put into place to stop nap breaks etc, if you can't be bothered to sign it ingame you have yourself to blame

Watch out Banana, its pedo bear !!!!!! =O

[18:19] <Nick> i would be the best homosexual ever

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

again InSaNe your not listening 48 signed a 48 hour nap instead of pnap "by mistake"

the conversation was that the agreement was a pnap and it was a mistake signing the 48 hour nap and when you have the conversation and both players say its a pnap then you dont think for one second that the other player would cancel the nap to farm later

again this goes back to the trust/honour/integrity issue where a line is crossed.

i didnt feel the need to push and pester and to cancel the agreement because i had the conversation regarding the pnap and thought that a mans word was good enough.

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,800
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 40 vs 43

christ insane you may know a lot or be a nice guy but you either dont see the point here or you really dont have the attributes of a mod. if you were a player i could excuse your stupidness but as a mod i expect more

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

24 Reply by

  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,000
  • Tag points: 174

Re: 40 vs 43

Don't worry Tobes. IC Death will get what is coming to him. Just have expos ready wink

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points