Re: 41 vs 46 Final War
We didn't nap. We ceasefired. Then 46 canceled and let's just say that gave us a little bit of leverage in the negotiations. Thanks 46 for the win! ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 41 vs 46 Final War
We didn't nap. We ceasefired. Then 46 canceled and let's just say that gave us a little bit of leverage in the negotiations. Thanks 46 for the win! ![]()
I never agreed that we havnt fought a single good war this round Noir. There you go twisting things to suit you again. We have apparently not fought a decent war by your definition of a decent war (which as far as your concerned, only your fam has). The war that would have met your definition of a good war is the EOR war we planned on having with you guys, but since you guys are giving all your planets away we dont have to worry about having a "good" war by Noirs definition so we are just gonna let the rest of the round play out it may, and maybe have some fun in the process ![]()
Remo no need to try wordtrickery to appear smart...
We have fought two major and even wars tis round, vs 47 and vs 38. Both times we were outsaved but ended up doing very well.
The war you planned against us never was a proper war, as your fam has maybe 14 days of savings while we are straight out of a war, and you know it. Its just vulturing
Remo again, you do not know what happened in the war with 38 and 41. It was a very even war. Chomp even JUST said that the post before you. Stats were even posted towards the end of the war when around 600 planets from EACH side had exchanged hands during the couple days of war. It was with in 10-20 planets, how do you call that a butt kicking?? Not having pop bankers was a strategic decision for the first half of the round. We had 4 very very active attackers who wanted to attack, instead of pumping ressies into pop bankers to get the large and going, like what you did. We pumped the resources into fleet and had a good fight with almost every family in the galaxy. Noir is not bitter about not winning the round trust me. Within the first week of the round it was made clear that we were not necessarily playing for the win. We were playing a cf banker strat and warring everyone we could. If we wanted to infra whore like 46 did, trust me, we could have easily infra whored and had the same if not better eco than 46s, theres no doubt in my mind.
And with this comment about waiting a couple days where there were no attacks between 38 and 41, where the heck are you getting your info from? There was MAYBE 16-20 hrs when there was only a few attacks, and half of that was when attackers were asleep. So please 46 get YOUR head out of your arse instead of saying Noir and 41 has theirs up their own arses.
You're saying Noir is bitter about not winning this round. He doesn't care, it is you guys who are bitter about not being able to win the round, because 38 is. Take what you want from 41, and you wont win size or round, and you know that, thats why you guys are whining constantly in this thread, no amount of facts will change that fact it seems.
Screw 41
I never said 41 had there head up there arse, I said Noir did. We are not bitter at all, we as a family made a decision very early on in the round that winning size this round was not our main goal. After the crap that you guys pulled breaking the boundary agreement, we decided that making sure you guys payed for what you did was far more important than winning size this round
I also think its funny that you guys whine about fams farming to win the round, yet you see no problem with 38 winning size by having you guys give them 1k+ planets lol. 38 deserves to win the round, and good for them for doing it, I just dont see how the same people saying you cant win a war by farming, are saying you can win a war by having 1k+ planets passed to you.
Mustve been such a boring round for u guys then
4 weeks of infrawhoring and farming just to get the most failed war ever ![]()
nah the round was not boring noir you know its fun to do some good infra booms ![]()
and we had plenty of wars to make the round interesting. but we never did go for the win we could have easy had 6k planets by now if we did farm
so that should say enough about our intention to win the round. (we never wanted to win we just are disapointed there where no good fams this round)
38 only became a good fam later in round but they would have lost a war against us (hellz even agreed to it that they would have lost a war against us
)
We had a rough start yes, but I am not so sure we would lose a war against you guys. We were bottom feeding for a bit but it gave us more targets to hit for easy planets and grow. Are you even an attacker? Do you even lift bro? We have Hellz/Teddy/Me/Colo/Whereami/Zeus. Impire is a good attacker, but who else do you have? KtigerLOL??
Screw 41....screw u all...
thats what i mean you would have lost you dont even know who we have ![]()
for the info impire/talic/middle/scorp
and the only 2 good attackers you guys have are hellz and maybe teddy
colo can only attack when he has more fleet and in cancel wars i have never seen him won a war
and you if you are still like the old days you would not even stand a chance against Ktiger ![]()
and the other 2 attackers you mention are inactive
so no im not attacking im banking this round because if i would attack it would be unfair for mw this round ![]()
>
if i was attacking i would not have time to talk in uni
and like i said before i would woop you ![]()
Lol one day we will get a chance to fight. Go attacker next round ![]()
Our relations with Zombie Apocalypse (6746) have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 25 weeks.
1 day to go till war! Good luck & Have fun.
hellz is maybe not playing next round. only if hellz goes attacker ill go attacker to ![]()
lol... come on guys 2 Wrongs dont make a right...
- + - makes a + right?
@Kai, That's like 0+0=1 ^^
But it makes it real tight!
id prefer 38 to win that 46
> ~_SpaWn_~ wrote:
> @Kai, That's like 0+0=1 ^^
x = y.
Then x2 = xy.
Subtract the same thing from both sides:
x2 - y2 = xy - y2.
Dividing by (x-y), obtain
x + y = y.
Since x = y, we see that
2 y = y.
Thus 2 = 1, since we started with y nonzero.
Subtracting 1 from both sides,
1 = 0
So technically Kai is correct ![]()
wrong ocho, u cant divide by zero the dividing by (x-y) isnt valid
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 41 vs 46 Final War
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.