Re: The Election Recounts
They actually read the Constitution before. And they knew that a few culturally relevant and historically significant references to the 10 commandments or crosses didn't amount to an establishment of religion or interference with the practice of anyone's religion.
They didn't build any churches or invest significant money into anything remotely "religious," so that was lawful. But they didn't whine when a 95% Christian community used private money to put up a cross as a war memorial either, which some forget was and is lawful.
I understand that slippery slopes are bad and all, but when literally no argument can be/is made that any coercion or "establishment" of religion is happening, it's not necessarily a violation of the US Constitution. The purpose of the first amendment is to protect people's speech and free exercise of religion, not whitewash ALL religious references from EVERYTHING a person might EVER witness in public/on public land.
If a memorial to military sacrifice includes a Christian symbol, for example, and 95% of those who made the sacrifice were Christian, I don't necessarily see a problem. Sure, I think it should make a point to acknowledge non-Christian sacrifice in this example, but paying homage to the guiding faith of the vast majority of those involved isn't necessarily an "establishment" or endorsement of a religion. It's just history and respect. Let local governments, elected by and representative of their constituents, make such decisions and the federal government doesn't have a problem.
I think the point is that it's unconstitutional for a Kenyan to be president, so recounts are unnecessary!