Re: Mama Said Knock You Out
Well, Mama did say to knock you out.
LL Cool J put his
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → General → Mama Said Knock You Out
Well, Mama did say to knock you out.
LL Cool J put his
The burglar is just lucky he broke into the house of LL Cool J and not some NYC cop.
Not all movie stars are wimps. Some of them do know how to defend themselves. Then again, most of them live in gated communities too. Means the robber had to get past the gate. Past the hired security patrolling the area. And past the home security alarm system that LL Cool J has in his home.
So. You have to ask yourself punk. Was it an actual burglar, or a bullcrap setup or story that is a total falsification, just to pull in more ratings to a show, that doesn't have the ratings of the original NCIS show.
I still want to know if Ducky lives.
If the cops are quoted as saying they'll press a charge then I doubt it was a hoax
Cops don't press charges. The victim presses charges. If the victim decides to forego trial, or NOT press charges...
then the perpetrator goes free. LL Cool J, can press charges.
And if he doesn't the perp goes free. Now if you expect me to believe this guy got through three securities unhindered, then you'll have to follow the court case fully. Now, how many stars are accosted, where you nary see a trace of perpetrators being sent to jail for breaking and entering? All those hundreds of psychos looking to make a name for themselves, kidnapping stars, or family of stars? Their going to burglarize a gated community? With rent a cops? With home security and lawn surveilance?
If the victim decides to drop the charges, then the police must let him go.
thppppppppppt
We'll see if the "victim" will press charges or not.
So no, I don' believe the story is true at all. I think it's either a fake story, or a setup by the production company that shoots NCIS: Las Angeles. It just stinks to high hell of stupidity at a level, that even a drug addict wouldn't even attempt.
Actually no they don't have to let him go. It might make it hard to go forward but in the tough cities just because a witness refuses to testify doesn't mean a felony case gets dropped.
Nope. The victim can release the perpatrator by pressing no charges within a 24 hour span. The state only takes over if the perpetrator can be proven to be a physical threat to himself or others. And that usually only happens in cases where the perpatrator was found to be mentally incompetent to stand trial.
Might be something as stupid as family or friend, being drunk and getting into the house. That I would believe, mostly because who else would have access to the estate and house. With keys or code to enter the house, and not be able to set off any of the alarms? Besides the people that installed the alarms. That would be sad.
Still, I think it's all hocus. When the guy is actually in a court and there are court proceedings you can get back to me with the verdict. If any ever come into play.
Lol! Yah, now I know it's some screwd up crap....plead Not Guilty? 1.1 MILLION dollar bail.....on a transient?
Let me get this straight. LL Cool J, woke up to noise in the kitchen, but not the noise from the man when he first broke into the home?
Yahhh.....
Yeah, in America you don't even need evidence... Poor Uncle Saddam ![]()
"Nope. The victim can release the perpatrator by pressing no charges within a 24 hour span. The state only takes over if the perpetrator can be proven to be a physical threat to himself or others. And that usually only happens in cases where the perpatrator was found to be mentally incompetent to stand trial."
Wrong. In a criminal case the prosecution is always, the government. In a felony case, especially a "violent" one like burglary, the prosecutor can proceed even if the "victim" refuses to cooperate. That's why OJ is in prison even though the collector he robbed said he didn't want OJ to get convicted.
>>Might be something as stupid as family or friend, being drunk and getting into the house. That I would believe, mostly because who else would have access to the estate and house. With keys or code to enter the house, and not be able to set off any of the alarms? Besides the people that installed the alarms. That would be sad.<<
Or not, as, there's absolutely no evidence of any of that. Maybe it was Natalie Wood?
Actually I'm thinking that maybe we're either both right, or we're both wrong, then it hits me....
...the laws governing each state is completely different.
Still...that doesn't explain a $1.1 million bond on a transient. California judges don't get payed enough money now do they?
Actually i'm very interested in the Not Guilty portion of this case now.
hahha Tom Cruise bouncing on a couch
lazy cops like to say they can't prosecute...they also like to say it's a civil matter not a crime...but when an immigrant says "no no I won't prosecute that street gang" in my state they still come down on hard
Actually I was looking back down the cases of the state laws.
It's possible for the victim to not press charges, even if the State wishes to proceed. Most of the time, the state prosecutor, or officers of the law will not tell the "victims" that is it their right to drop the charges. In fact most officers are not even TRAINED to inform a victim of this one element of criminal law.
A prosecutor can proceed with charges if the victim was killed. Or influence the victim to press charges.
A police officer can inform a victim if they wish to press charges or not.
What a Prosecutor and a Police Officer can NOT do, is NOT inform a victim of their right to drop charges. So in effect most cases can go forward with charges, mostly because the victim is not informed of their right to drop charges. Which is a BIG nono on a few state law books. Most prosecutors tend not to relay this information to victims.
Sadly this is true in most states. I don't know how many court cases that i've seen where a woman, was brutally beaten by their boyfriend or husband...and she decided NOT to press charges. Depending on each states indidivual law, even though it's Assault and Battery many men were released from custody. I"m not saying every city, county and state legistlature is going to let that slide, but some places do.
" I don't know how many court cases that i've seen where a woman, was brutally beaten by their boyfriend or husband...and she decided NOT to press charges. Depending on each states indidivual law, even though it's Assault and Battery many men were released from custody. I"m not saying every city, county and state legistlature is going to let that slide, but some places do."
That's surefire prosecution in CA after Nicole Brown Simpson was not brutally murdered by not-OJ Simpson, who had beat her up and every time cops came out she refused to prosecute. So that's a very common example out here. Also prostitution...who's the complaining victim there? Or drug cases? The offended party is the State.
everyone knows OJ didn't do it. he was in the naked gun movies. therefore he is innocent
@ The Yell
Sadly. I made two bets. Both bets were on both case files against OJ Simpson.
Was he guilty of murder. I won $50. ON a bet. That he would be found not guilty. It could NOT be proven that he murdered Nicole. All the evidance against OJ was circumstantial. Even I knew this.
On the second trial, Did OJ have knowledge that Nicole's life was in immenent danger. Now there was enough SUSPICIAN that yes he knew her life could have been in danger. I won $20.00 bucks on that guilty verdit.
I won $70.00 off the OJ Simpson trials. One, I knew the law. Two, I knew the odds. Three, I knew exactly what was going on inside the jurors heads.
Oh, and Nicole was the victim, and she DIED, which means that the prosecution was FREE to carry out their proceedings. Which I had already stated above. Prosecution can bring charges against a "suspected" perpatrator of a crime if the victim dies.
You chose a bad case file to make an arguement.
Imperial Forum → General → Mama Said Knock You Out
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.