• Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

And anywone says anything:
They cancelled on us!

10 Slow and steady... (6639) [17,93]  1619 24068510 70942
                                    VS
13 Wanna Rumble? (6655) [61,117]  1254 15986378 48536



Plz don't attack any of the fam's and make this a fair fight


I wonder if they are gonna tell me exactly why they cancelled on us ;-)
Cause i got a feeling i already know.........

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 672

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

damn aussies cant hold their liquor!! and they say us Americans are the hostile ones

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,180
  • Tag points: 2

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

Big bad Banksy!!!!!!
packin bricks, drinkin and then warring!!!! Thats wats up son!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 672

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

thought your suppose to wait till the 48 hours is up before declaration/attack ?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 64
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

Yeah they suppose to, seems 55 likes to bend the rules.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

who's attacking? not until nap is over...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

/me hopes 55 accidentally hits us so we can hammer them tongue

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 877
  • Tag points: 42

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

/me agrees with WS

It is easier to meet girl in park than to park meat in girl.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 672

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

strange, 39 declared before nap terms were up...... why lie... nvm its uni news, carry on

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

is that not allowd? Actually i was just wondering if it was even possible and apperantly it was... doesn't matter as you can't attack until nap is over so.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

Yep you wouldn't want to wait another 3 ticks lol

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

Well, actually i wanted to, but i wanted to be sure i know when the war was starting lol
Didn't think i could declare war while nap was still cancelling...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 423
  • Tag points: 34

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

Good luck!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 672

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

between 56 and 44 doing fig and droid runs on us i guess itll be an easy sweep for 39 gotta love it....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • WiWi
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,386

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

well, it's not that a war gives you the right to be protected till it's over, but i can imagine it's no fun
but about the fig runs, hover your figs and you won't get fig runned:p

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 169

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

seems like 39 has an illegal allaince going on in mw?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,527
  • Tag points: 68

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

no illegal alliance in 39...just many naps

however, there is one in 39 has brother playing in 55...im not surprised that 55 cancelled on 39 first because of what's in the family forum

Proverbs 11:14 "Where there is no guidance the people fall,
But in abundance of counselors there is a victory."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

18 Reply by Pitbull (edited by Pitbull 03-Sep-2012 05:06:34)

  • Posts: 3,040
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

> derkel wrote:

> seems like 39 has an illegal allaince going on in mw?


Do you know what a illegal allaince is? Obvisously you do not.

Yes i ran some figs then realize that you guys had a war pending, i asked my leader to send your leader a apology msg. War or not its always a good thing to hide your figs noob.

Pitbull(Humanoid - Once a Force scholar and teacher, turned Warlord. Vain, he believes he is the best fighter alive.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil[1] control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority.  And has the means and authority to engage in war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 672

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

is what it is, uni news = propaganda, no biggy we will fight till 0 planets with or without you buddies fug running prio to war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

44 send me a message as well to appoligize. So i think they might have missed my post here. They only did a few attacks anyway.

56 just did what they do best. Attacking 55 all they could cause they knew we were going to war and 55 would become to small... They did the same thing with 46. When they realised i was preparing to hit them they hit them first eventhough they were 40% of their fam nw, afraid they wouldn't get to those free planets after i was done due to the nw restrictions. They even bullied me into not attacking 46.

Oh and they are getting planets from me as well so that i have less spread on 55. Claiming all of sector 4 as their core as a reason for the attacks. Me wonders if they have actually fought a top 10 fam this round or just got all of their planets from low ranked fams. Is probably why they have so many planets and such a low nw ;-)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,033
  • Tag points: 6

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

56 is now even exploring towards us. I bet they'll use us taking those explored planets out as a reason not to stay out of our war ;-)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 500

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

Lol carrera, just gtfo... You're just mad because we cleared you out of s4 and now you start bitching. Grow up please.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

23 Reply by King (edited by King 03-Sep-2012 14:09:20)

  • King
  • King
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 2,825

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

Yup.... less than 3 ticks into 39/55's war... seems as if 55 is attacking back... oh wait no... that's 56!

THE FAMILY NEWS FOR YEAR 17
----------------------------


----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
51 planet(s) captured by Darkside021 (100 %).
29 planet(s) captured by FBI (100 %).
2 planet(s) captured by Why (100 %).
-------------------
80 from #6655
2 from #6656
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 82 times. 2 families and 82 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 66 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 16.


---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
17 planet(s) lost by FBI
-------------------
17 to #6656
-------------------
We have been beaten 17 times. 1 families and 17 planets involved.
We actually lost 17 planet(s) in total.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 4,811

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

He is King the KING!!!!!  smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 672

Re: 6639 Vs 6655

slaughter is over

0 Dislike 0 Post Points