Re: Networth Attack limit change

I just wanna have quantum get op bonus like the pax has on magic smile

~Liever staand sterven dan levend kruipen!~

Re: Networth Attack limit change

> ~_SpaWn_~ wrote:

> I just wanna have quantum get op bonus like the pax has on magic smile


+ % to agent ops.

God the nukes that would fly then.

The Belief that one's Own View of reality is the only Reality of the most dangerous of all delusions.

I'll be back and next time ill bring a stronger hamster.

I'm so desensitized, it's gotta be just completely bananas to get me off. - Carl Brutananadilewski

Re: Networth Attack limit change

Terrible ideas. Why should the maggots be protected? You should be able to attack anyone regardless of NW. The 35% is way to high to begin with...
Survival of the fittest...

Re: Networth Attack limit change

and again it starts getting personal, stop this guys. just ignore it.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Networth Attack limit change

seeing spam is too lazy to post his idea, i'll post it.
nw rules should work in both ways. This to prevent that a small fam can attack a bigger fam in their cores.
When the nw percentage goes up there's always bigger fams that can attack you, and we need to protect the bigger fams aswell.
2nd of all he came up with a surrender button. This would be a button a fam can press when they lose a certain percentage of planets.
By pressing this button a 72hr nap is signed immediately. This to give the losing fam a breather. And as they prolly got smashed a good bit already it won't hurt the other fam.

I personally think this is a great idea. Let's see what else will come  up big_smile

Re: Networth Attack limit change

The solution needs to be simple and effective, one which balances the chances of each and every fam to reach top place, and that would require stopping re-randmoning.  It just results in stacked fams: some with good players some with newbs and inactives.  It's not right to have fam's chances to win rounds botched from the start.  Ask anyone who does PVCs and they'll say I'm right: they know who will probably win as soon as they determine how the fams are stacked up.  Why should any single fam be stacked better than any other?  They should all be equal from the start.  Re-randoming subverts the whole point of randmoning in the first place which was to spread IC talent EQUALLY around the fams.

So the solution will have to involve simply stopping people from re-randoming. 

1.  You get to random into a fam once.  If you quit, you can't rejoin that galaxy until next round.

2.  Incorporate factions into the game.  See my factions thread in ideas:

http://www.imperialconflict.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=170950


Factions would solve the issues with Fam / Player NW

Re: Networth Attack limit change

@glenn

what about planets being retaken? + how do you set the number of losted planets before you can trigger that button? work with percentages?

i agree we should work on more fair fights, but everyone forgets that small fams raid, opp bigger fams also...
there isn't a problem with the networth rule cuz even 40-50% won't help but with the honour of certain fams/players

sure you can ask pnap for 200 planets from smaller fams, but once you're in a small fam remember big fams will ask the same or even more...

Re: Networth Attack limit change

The number of lost planets would be a percentage. I was thinking something like 10-15%.
About the retakes, even when the losing fam retakes, the minute they lost that amount of planets they can trigger the button, but if they choose not to, they don't have to.

Re: Networth Attack limit change

There sholdn't have to be an attack NW rule in the first place.  Ideally, both individual and fam and replaced with a transformative change to the game which would make the individual and fam NW protection rules unnecessary. 

I don't know exactly what this could be, but I have posted proposals for consideration of introducing factions: two sides which essentially must fight each other and leave the neutrals alone to their own devices.  I would like to receive feedback from the community regarding the introduction of factions.

Essentially, the game just isn't set up to give every fam the same chance of winning.  The fams get stacked right form the beginning.  This is the main problem.  If the game should be set up where IC talent is equally spread around each fam, no fam would dare try and farm another; if the game were set up where every fam ended up more or less the same NW; if the game were such that actually winning a war against a more or less equal NW fam was the only way to get bigger, then you wouldn't need any protection rules.

Re: Networth Attack limit change

xeno, could you please stop spamming your factions idea,we know it by now big_smile

36 (edited by Paininside 25-Aug-2012 17:35:03)

Re: Networth Attack limit change

there is a easy way to fix this,

hav 2 gals top
1hc gal where u swap between solo and small group hc rounds (short rounds month tops)
1 normal gal where u dont go over 5-6 per fam. with current player base u allready have 40-50 fams, if u go even smaller 4-5 u get can over 50-60 fams.
more fams to fight to regrow after losing a war, allow 1 vip spot so there is at tops 2 friends in the same fam (unless u get lucky)
and keep track of the activity of people, ammount of times/hours they log on a day, and split them evenly throughout all them 40-50 fams.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Networth Attack limit change

i like the idea of having smaller fams so we have more overall.:)