Re: Networth Attack limit change
I applaud the effort, just two points i have:
1. Make it count for ops aswell as attacking
2. Be braver, make it 50% to toss it up abit, the difference between 35% and 40% will only affect a few cases a round
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Networth Attack limit change
I applaud the effort, just two points i have:
1. Make it count for ops aswell as attacking
2. Be braver, make it 50% to toss it up abit, the difference between 35% and 40% will only affect a few cases a round
make it 60%
and even a small and not offensive opp will allow attacks
start of the round = everybody is equal
middle and the end = smaller fams can grow in peace
well until they get in range ![]()
There will be some more "nice" changes soon .. as soon as possible anyway.
In our thinking we better up it with 5% as trial and like poley says to find a balance we will up it again when needed.
about the ops .. is a idea we can look into indeed
Agree with 2.
And partly with 1.
Make it count for destructive/hard ops but allow soft/intel ops
The reason i want 50% or 60% and not 40% is that we have now seen 10 years of 35% even if 60% is too high in the long run, it ill make for an interesting trial. Better to overdo it and adjust it back later imo ![]()
I don't agree it is a good thing always though.
It's good for Mw, agreed. But for Pinwheel this could give several 'smaller' families the chance to run off with the size win. Last round (with the 35% rule) we actually just had to stop jumping infra or we would have had no chance of winning size, simply because families were that much smaller. That's no fun. I guess this will happen even sooner now.. :x
80% planet count rule after 60% NW rule ![]()
or something
Maybe that's not a bad idea. 80% is high though, just a suggestion: 50% net (you have to be realistic, infra has to be rewarded) and 70% planet rule? That wouldn't be so bad on first sight.
Noir is correct. Orion is a farmer anyways so his opinion is worthless. ![]()
Its a good change, but i would of been braver with the figure. Problem is there's so many dud leaders out there just treating others like dirt. You can amend all the percentages, but you also need to amend the players attitudes.
SLAM DUNK WAR IS ON! (6656) has DECLARED WAR on us
8 SLAM DUNK WAR IS ON! (6656) [91,94] 1624 14695464 53392
17 Partaxian's will pop your cher (6646) [109,104] 881 4573376 22155
is this even permitted under the rule?
i know that leader, he is a real man!
You can declare war on anybody. If you're below 40% rule, then only way to hit you is for them to use sentinel. That would be a lame ass way to farm a small fam, so hopefully they are just removing you from their core.
Uhmmm... if he is real man who will be you?
lol no we had 72hr nap they canceled and demanded 100 planets for perm nap
You tell [there once was a man from Nantucket...] half the story, grow up man
woa finally
3 years since i first talked about this change in the ideas forum (not sure if i was the 1st one tho).
Thank mods&devs, a slight change in the rules for a big change in the gameplay and the small families' chances, you won't need to up it to 50%
Now top fams will think it twice before doing early naps with other top fams, and it will increase the competition.
now just a question, is this for family NW only or does it apply for players NW too? because when you agree on a change like this you have to be sure its not a 1 legged change, so yeah 40% nw range should be applied to individual empires too, and 30% range for wars (instead of the previous 25%), and the planets blowup range idk wether it'd be better to keep it at 35% or not ![]()
So yeah, great decision to pull this idea into the game
but please make it complete with the individual ranges too
Sentinel Kobe Bryant Melancholy Hill 1983082gc 46 [ONLINE]
using sentinel to attack our banker isn't that an abuse of a game rule?
8 SLAM DUNK WAR IS ON! (6656) [91,94] 1624 17521178 53732
16 Partaxian's will pop your cher (6646) [109,104] 881 4578198 22309
Did that tag ever get fixed? ![]()
it's bugged as [something bad]
aleph you are a PUA right
?
agreed with noir, make a radical change, only then u wil see the clear difference, now the rape wil continue, for me id even go for 70% it stops the abuse of that manny poppers in the top fams (read noirs fam ;p)
Problem is NW doesn't really mean much, for before jump a fam can be outside 50% NW range but after their jump for a war be within it.
> Orbit wrote:
> Noir is correct. Orion is a farmer anyways so his opinion is worthless. ![]()
Its a good change, but i would of been braver with the figure. Problem is there's so many dud leaders out there just treating others like dirt. You can amend all the percentages, but you also need to amend the players attitudes.
I didn't say it's not a good thing, certainly for Mw.. But Pinwheel is shorter and thus getting it up to 50, or maybe even 60% could just ruin the fun for the big fams, simply because you get no chance to really push through with infra or everyone will drop out of range. That's why I liked the 70% Psize idea Norbit ![]()
Arby3
Moderator
Re: Networth Attack limit change
You can declare war on anybody. If you're below 40% rule, then only way to hit you is for them to use sentinel. That would be a lame ass way to farm a small fam, so hopefully they are just removing you from their core.
<Arby3>i mean, i can go beat up a bunch of street bums...but that doesnt make me a badass
<@Walking_Corpse>it makes you batman
You must mean that they just needed to remove us from OUR core? cuz 240 planet in their core is never gonna happen... Unless they think that THEIR core is the HOLE [no masking] map...
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Networth Attack limit change
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.