Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

In the hope of reaching the leader of 6550 I'm posting this in here.

Attacking and opping a fam 2,5 times smaller then you is low. Certainly since you allready took about 3 systems from us before and we havent got much left. Destroying our savings (what little we had anyhow) isnt even neccesary.

Oh and ignoring the messages from me and my fam members doesnt show much dignity from your side aswell.

527

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

so the only wars of the round were 53 vs 56, 58 vs 63, and 63 vs 53? disregarding the early raids one sided rapes/farming.

alos, pretty surprised 58 decided to pay instead of having a EOR war with 60. i guess everyone went inactive? my fam had a pretty cool round but overall, this is as lame and dead a galaxy can get yikes Lee, you passed up on some good fun cancellation war opportunity even if you weren't gonna have the bigger fleet, shoulda went for it...

528

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

I call any PW player to not trust anymore the players from 60 and 58

Deathstar, Lee and company, you are guilty, you have more than 50 planets in our core that you explored when there was nowhere else to explo, and even you used those planets to explo fast the blowups from our war vs 63. It's a shame and I will never sign a nap with you again, oh! and stop posting in the honour forum because you have no rights to talk about honour.

GXreborn, RD and company, you are guilty, you have more than 50 planets in our core that you explored and you always refused to give them, and then I got RD in our chatroom saying we are right and the planets must be handed, but nothing changes (the good cop and the bad cop trick?, or should I say the troll and the ugly troll?)

I talked to the mods about this not long ago and they read the naps and say I am right, but they're doing nothing at all saying they cannot enforce honour.  Alright.

I have lost COMPLETELY the hopes for this game, where people is free to post their opinions in the new honour forum while they're not honouring their present naps in the round.

And the tool in relations for planetary agreements?? it serves for nothing, it only adds more job for a leader and nothing in exchange.
And the enforced naps at relations?? they serve to support all these false Jesus talking about honour. If at least I could cancel them instantly (like in the old days) I could take those 100+ planets by force, then I'd be the napbreaker again and you the cool guys wink  catch the irony??

goodbye suckers

529

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

Sol used the planet swap NAP function earlier pretty well. It seemed pretty nifty albeit a little labor intensive.

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

No stay in FAM? We Had a shuffle this round

531

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

> Nox wrote:

> Sol used the planet swap NAP function earlier pretty well. It seemed pretty nifty albeit a little labor intensive.

it serves for nothing if the other leader dont sign back, the only way you have to recover those planets is by canceling the nap and wating 48h or 72h but then they save and get ready for a war, using violation planets as war spots.

I repeat, If only I could break the nap and be called napbreaker!!

X(

532

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

big_smile oh well, i don't think those core intrusions matter much in the long run since I don't think you guys are gonna fight anyway.

533

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

when u're talking about 100+ planets it does matter, because of all the infra in those missing planets that would have increased our economy (to give you a good fight, for example) or your fam could have 2300 planets right now (another example).

534

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

Hmm yeah. I think Lee's just gotten lazy, and Gx I dunno. Probably doesn't give a shit haha. Oh well. Lets see how hard 60 tries to catch us up in size smile

535

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

RD seems to invest in trying to uphold his public image and etc, so since you called him out, maybe he'll abide by the agreement his fam made with yours smile

536

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

At least we had a hard(but fair) fight with you guys Nox! I enjoyed that very much smile The rest of the round was a bit of a disappointment for me though sad

"The quiet ones are the ones that change the universe... The loud ones only take the credit."

537

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

Just a remark, if any of those 58 or 60 win the round by a difference of 50 planets, you must know those are the violations they have in our core tongue   (but any of them winning is highly improbable btw)

538

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

6560 can win it in size. 100 payment from 6558, farm 6555 for a few more hundred, keep the ~50 planets in your core, farm whoever else they aren't NAPped with.  We have options to gain a few hundred more planets too, but I dunno if we will go for it. Maybe, maybe not. I'm not feeling motivated these days since the gamefield has been retarded recently.

539

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

@Etro hehe yup big_smile Us in 63 actually had a very good war against 58 (short but sweet) and against you guys (long and sweet and very good spirited). Our round was pretty awesome coming back from a terrible start but i think most other fam's round was rather lame with ppl going inactive and etc.

BTW, thx for the planets in Orion! tongue

540

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

you know waht it looks like?? gimme an I gimme an A  yikes

handing 100 planets without a fight at EOR should never be allowed, it can change the final result the unfairest way ever seen

541 (edited by Etro 21-Aug-2012 22:42:10)

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

> Nox wrote:

>

BTW, thx for the planets in Orion! tongue

LOL, so that was you. I stopped paying attention to Orion after my other 4 "fam members" went totally inactive after 1 day sad.  Have fun with my planets smile

We had a few players who left us hanging during our first war. We had to remove them from the fam and that cost us the round.

"The quiet ones are the ones that change the universe... The loud ones only take the credit."

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

I showed Gx how to use the agreements. Not sure why they haven't been signed, but seems like crap to me.

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

543

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

Dunno. You're not in MW right Render? Most of the big factor players in these fams probably are in MW and currently don't care about PW much. Plus, Lee's fam just cancelled and re-napped two top 5 fams in MW and got paid planets, so what loss is there if he pays some planets to the rival fam in a galaxy he doesn't care much about tongue?

544

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

no I'm not in MW neither in Orion, and I'm not blaming Lee alone bcause I know he gives a crap about PW right now, and I'm not accusing of IA, I'm just accusing them of not honouring a nap with a (suposedly) contender family.
And just saying, this PW round is over, there is one clear winner, the family that beated all the other contenders down, 63 deserves to win, and it'd be a shame that 60 could win it on a strange EOR manouver without fighting.

545

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

> Arby3 wrote:

> I showed Gx how to use the agreements. Not sure why they haven't been signed, but seems like crap to me.


Enforce them, same as you enforce 48h in a nap cancelation, you should be able to enforce nap breaks or planetary agreements, when the case has been studied and you know who's right and who's wrong.

546

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

I guess Lee does care, he hates losing... most of his fam prolly went inactive on him and he wanted to minimize losses and just renapped and paid planets. I'm just mad at him for making not just one, but two of these decisions that's kinda taking the spirit out of this game.

But yeah, don't care too much about EoR rankings these days so oh well. Whatever happens happens, and I don't think the rest of us in 63 will sit idly as 60 gets closer in size anyhow haha.

Enough forum spamming from me for now. Hopefully.

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

> Render wrote:

> I call any PW player to not trust anymore the players from 60 and 58

Deathstar, Lee and company, you are guilty, you have more than 50 planets in our core that you explored when there was nowhere else to explo, and even you used those planets to explo fast the blowups from our war vs 63. It's a shame and I will never sign a nap with you again, oh! and stop posting in the honour forum because you have no rights to talk about honour.

Stop whining, I told you we would be ok to swap out any core violations. You didn't agree to swap and just wanted to take those planets, which I didn't agree to obviously. Afterwards you just stopped replying (as I guess you got busy with 63).

Good in nature, but evil by our own free will. Incestuously created by the will to kill

My IC-Wiki Page

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

> Nox wrote:

> I guess Lee does care, he hates losing... most of his fam prolly went inactive on him and he wanted to minimize losses and just renapped and paid planets. I'm just mad at him for making not just one, but two of these decisions that's kinda taking the spirit out of this game.

We napped because we didn't have a choice, what can you do when you 1 active attacker and 4 bankers to fight a war? Just bend over and take it? tongue Anyway, I don't blame anyone in our family, it's summer for god's sake, people SHOULD go inactive tongue

Good in nature, but evil by our own free will. Incestuously created by the will to kill

My IC-Wiki Page

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

so we cant stay in the same family were in now?

Re: ~~Pinwheel 71 pVc!~~

No, reshuffle round I think.

Good in nature, but evil by our own free will. Incestuously created by the will to kill

My IC-Wiki Page