Re: Terms of Service Agreements
There's a tendency for Terms of Service Agreements to protect the interests of the service providers and not the clients receiving services. Sometimes,TOS agreements might place the client in danger of incurring damages by voicing grievances; resulting in self-censorship which infringes on free speech; and in the case where the service provider is a virtual monopoly, the self-censorship of clients from voicing grievances out of fear of getting sued results in incrementally worse service to the public, which in turn results in systemic injustice and may even endanger the public's safety.
For example, I would never start a discussion on IC's Terms of Service Agreement out of fear that Stefan might sue me for damages incurred by this discussion. If I were to start a discussion, might I get banned? Might the thread be closed by mods?
What if IC were an essential, government-run service like health care or the mail system and their TOS included such a clause that would make people afraid of voicing grievances? Their only alternative would be not accepting the TOS agreement and thus not having access to said essential service, which in turn would prevent them from functioning in society. Additionally, they wouldn't have any grievances to express because they wouldn't have used the service.
TOS agreements should be the focus of grievances themselves imho.