Re: Is this what IC is?
...
the round is 2 weeks old and you retards have raided/napped 6 fams, and we, the 7th refused to.
so out of 14 fams, you have done this to half.
this is about as sad as ic gets...
Primo
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Is this what IC is?
...
the round is 2 weeks old and you retards have raided/napped 6 fams, and we, the 7th refused to.
so out of 14 fams, you have done this to half.
this is about as sad as ic gets...
some fams aint just napping! its all a conspiricy! I.A's everywhere i look
agrees with dukey alot of IA's in pw going on.. allowing portals to go up protecting others cores.. etc etc
2 weeks into a 6 week round, and you are surprised to get raided. Go back to mw
.
We are still raiding people?
I said push infra a week ago! X(
i say die!
Shut it Mr. I Get Raped In Other Games! X(
And half of our naps had 0 raids involved. You kind of jumped to a wrong conclusion there, Primo.
Plus, what is wrong about some attackers having a bit of fun, using that morale that otherwise goes to waste. It works surprisingly well to secure a core early on and to getcsome action into the gal and form your fam's reputation as an agressive fam: one banker into pmode (which nowadays is nothing) and a decent, agreeable nap proposal, is all it takes for most fams to accept your offers.
Honestly, all this whining about something you can easily deter people from doing (lasers, portals, keeping a save core with a buffer zone around it). This thread basically is a show of either a lack in compitence ("oh i did not build any lasers and now i got raided, surprise surprise), lazyness, or the combination of both, showing how some players are too used to imperial infra and scared of some imperial conflict.
Big up to Gx for having kept up this offensive style, even with my activity not being optimal. I support him 100% on this.
Oh you sly foxes, under the false pretentions of nap talks lulling Gx into a cf while sending out raid fleets of your own. Even after the poor guy showed good will by recalling his, which i had told him not to.
Game on.
Worst Draft.
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lklnfwAHw01qc3geoo1_500.gif
woot is this a flame Lee thread?? I'd need 1 full hour to read it, is it worth the reading?
can anybody do me a summary? ![]()
Ya it is easy...
Primo dance as butterfly... and Lee like to kick that arse. Finish! ![]()
A code of honor
Hmmm we as mod team could set up a meeting.
but im thinking (sometimes)
How should we as modteam controll this code ? or will that be a public issue?
Im aye with a code but hmmmm how to judge and punish ?
Keep on topic please ladies ![]()
thats something to discus on the meeting i guess
but we can at least establish the guidelines, a lot of people dont even know what is done and what is not done
> ~Killas~ wrote:
> btw, when I sent out those links I was in the exact same situation as Primo except Lee demanded more planets than that from us.
......I just reacted a little differently to it ![]()
I still cry myself to sleep thinking about those lqs I lost! ![]()
Implementing a code of honour seems like going full circle back to where we began. We had a code of honour since the betas for several years. Mods and the community tried to enforce it but it was very difficult (due to some of the reasons Final Doom mentions here, besides others). Eventually the code was scrapped altogether and some of the rules in the code were implemented ingame (pmode on 50% loss, etc.). However this wasn't exactly done smoothly and some rules were ignored/left out. I think finishing what was started back then and fully implementing the code ingame is a better solution than trying to enforce it through mods/community.
Of course this would mean drafting a fresh code for today's version of IC which is a challenge in itself and should probably be done with the community's collaboration.
Code of Honour?? Yours guys are crazies... Liberty of game always is better that conditions of honour (honour dont exist much guys like cheating naps and cheating game)... except if exist one rule precise as 35% NW.... possibly this game will be more effective for to give more players.
This honour topic comes up every round. This is old news now.... From what i remember NAP breaks and bullshyt happened since the betas.... For some reason people are always saying the games honour has died, but i think its better than the past. People just didnt complain about it before.... Leave Lee alone he is a good man
Well maybe nap breaks would occur a lot less if people actually took the time to sign them ingame as opposed to via the message system?
This is what IC is nowadays. Which is why there needs to be a lot of new changes. Starting with what humidity and I have been saying! Either scale families depending on number of players, so families with 5 players can actually defend themselves. Or what Humidity is saying by saying a certain percentage of attacks can be made onto a family split up between attackers.
http://www.imperialconflict.com/forum/viewforum.php?id=6238
lol I shit on that honour crap, its all words.
Redesign the 35% rule into 45 or even 50%.
Yes in the old days 35% was fine because if your fam got pwned you had more then enough equal targets too regain your strength or had some fun.
Now when you get pwned your fam is dead since they are not enough targets left in this game.
uhm you mean redesign to 40% or 45% Shadow, I cannot see how you avoid more farming by increasing the # of fams in farming range ![]()
Imperial Forum → Universal News → Is this what IC is?
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.