Re: 6405 v 6404

6405 has just cancelled a 72 hour NAP with 6404 and will start attacking after 72 hours.

Have a good fight

Re: 6405 v 6404

Go 6405!

Re: 6405 v 6404

pfff 05 going after a smaller fam again, someone should do something about them:p

Re: 6405 v 6404

lol, we in a war atm (War is almost over though, other side gave up), and 6405 just taking advantage of the situation...nicely done....

.>   )\;`a__
(  _ _)/ /-." /~~ 
(rawr)
`( )_ )/
  <_  <_

Re: 6405 v 6404

you guys were farming them for the past rl week, except for a couple of days where they had the upper hand.  we waited a few days for you guys to regain the upper hand and start peace talks but you guys just kept farming away.  and besides, it's about time we fought.;P  round is ending soon.

Re: 6405 v 6404

04 picked on a fam half there size now a bigger fam picks on them and all of a sudden their getting taken "advantaged" of.....

Re: 6405 v 6404

In fairness, we we're going to cancel more or less 12 hours after the original post went up, so we played as nice as we could.

And they the only family we aren't pnapped close to us in size, so we can twiddle our thumbs or actually do something. *shrugs*

Re: 6405 v 6404

If i remember correctly Twisted Metal, it was your fam that started this not the other way around, and Ur FA didnt want to end this....he just kept going and going....An also Magni, most the plts we were fighitng over were ours, only in the last few days we started to kill their eco to put an end to them.

.>   )\;`a__
(  _ _)/ /-." /~~ 
(rawr)
`( )_ )/
  <_  <_

Re: 6405 v 6404

star send me a msg i dunno who you are would be to catch up (regardless of war)

Re: 6405 v 6404

he's Ph33r1es5

Re: 6405 v 6404

@pain

Its difficult. We would of liked to of done it before this 92 stuff happenned when we we're closer, but you went to war, so we waited and jumped a whole bunch of infra and well now what else are we to do? Your very close to us in size just not infra sad

Its attack a fam 10mil less then us or someone 70mil more then us...we're in no-mans land alright.

Re: 6405 v 6404

@ Pain, we initially wanted to war guys right after we beat down 03.  but before we could finish, you guys started to farm 92 and this has continued for over 1 rl week.  with the round ending in 6 days and our NAP cancellation time being 3 days, when exactly did you want us to cancel if we did?  at least you guys have time to save up now.  i was initially against the idea of NAPping before we even skirmished.:P

Re: 6405 v 6404

Too soon, too soon. A candle of insufficient wick

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?