• Posts: 2,204
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 6405 vs 6403

Especially when your top banker refuses to aid his 12 mill income

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,204
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 6405 vs 6403

Trying to take over leadership of 03 and end this dishonourable crap...i apologize to Zidi and Magni for my leaders idiocity...and now hes making me rogue cause I refuse to aid his war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • TCO
  • TCO
  • Hardcore Legend
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,006
  • Tag points: 16

Re: 6405 vs 6403

lemme make a wild guess ... this was your last post in this thread?

When speaking your mind, it is of utmost importance to keep using it !

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 198

Re: 6405 vs 6403

> Oxygen wrote:

The only thing that I'm mad about is that I can't personally dismantle your fam to 0 this round.  Don't worry, I can wait until next round smile

Hey man, I'm just along for the ride.  No need to bring my nw down even lower lol...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 394
  • Tag points: 8

Re: 6405 vs 6403

0 networth! that would be our new high!

"Is god willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Is he neither able or willing? Then why call him god?"
Ender

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • WiWi
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,386

Re: 6405 vs 6403

oooh, it looks like 03 is fed up with KTiger being leader;) or is this maybe a dirty tactic again to trick DK into aiding the war;)

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 771

Re: 6405 vs 6403

probably a dirty tactic Wiwi.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 767

Re: 6405 vs 6403

Its no dirty tactic im taking leadership

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 6405 vs 6403

dirty tactic...since u are working with KTiger and still listens to him

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,204
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 6405 vs 6403

Yes it will still be Ktiger leading in the shadows.  I will be deleting in 7 ticks the 24 hours I gave you guys is up have fun breaking my 2 mill sollies

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,734
  • Tag points: 34

Re: 6405 vs 6403

I'm confused on this one...you tell fam to take your planets, then you make 2mill soldiers....and don't station them to let them take planets? And yet you still give them 24 hours to do so? Sounds like a Ktiger plan to me...

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,204
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 6405 vs 6403

You should read all the ridiculous messages in my inbox RB3...and I built that much ground to spite this dishonourable family into recognizing their wrong doings.  It may be selfish or dishonourable as well but its just the icing on the cake after the last 2 rounds Ktiger has ashamed the IC community

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,204
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 6405 vs 6403

You reap what you sow and they still havent enden this facade of a war

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • xmen
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 182

Re: 6405 vs 6403

"dishonourable family" bit of a large brush there!!!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,204
  • Tag points: 4

Re: 6405 vs 6403

There is only one player in 03 who has come out and said he disagrees with Ktiger.  He said I should stay and continue on as Ss but I will stay true to my decision

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,413

Re: 6405 vs 6403

Damn my fams in a war???

At least no one can attack me haha smile

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

67 Reply by playaparadise (edited by playaparadise 01-Jul-2012 20:02:11)

  • Posts: 767

Re: 6405 vs 6403

DK ur actions are just as bad as what KT did.  You forget the fam is made up of more than one person.  Most of the fam including myself did not know that KT possibly(i did not read through all messages etc of what happened don't know what to believe) accepted a Pnap before we started clearing.  You left the rest of the fam who worked hard to build you up in the wind.  What KT did was wrong and a lowball tactic but thats just one person going against his word in a game where it seems to happen more and more often.  and you waited 24hrs after i got leadership at hr 20 and started to talk to 05 about a pnap and you delete before i can agree.  Now i don't really care anymore about this round too many stupid players out there

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 771

Re: 6405 vs 6403

stop lying playaparadise.  i messaged EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU to prove KTiger's agreement to our PNAP terms.  you're all a bunch of liars.  and now you guys even passed leadership back to KTiger, since the leadership change trick didn't make DK stay.  our new PNAP terms remain the same: 350 of PassAgg's planets or 300 as an entire fam.  or else we take 500 by force for pulling a stunt like that.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 771

Re: 6405 vs 6403

should've just paid the initial 75 huh?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

70 Reply by playaparadise (edited by playaparadise 02-Jul-2012 03:14:08)

  • Posts: 767

Re: 6405 vs 6403

yes u messaged me saying that KT agreed to a nap.  I asked KT and he/she said that no nap was ever signed that you guys were still in talks but thought the price was too steep for a fam that didn't have shares.  Now am i supposed to believe the person ive been playing with for the last couple weeks or the person who i have no idea who it is.  In hindsight it seems KT pulled a fast one, but i will never pay 300 for a nap whatever the circumstances.  KT has leadership back because this situation in beyond repairable only thing we could do i suppose was mark KT rogue and kill off but even i can't get the support of the fam for that.  ^^ and read up in parenthesis where i said i did not read all my messages since i was away for the week in vegas.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 771

Re: 6405 vs 6403

too steep for a fam that didn't have shares!?  L.O.L.  i had over 25 portalled system shares (about 500 planets) with your fam.  i could've destroyed your fleets and grabbed 150+ planets in the first tick alone.  R.O.F.L.  it's YOUR fam that didn't have shares.

anyways, i've concluded that you guys are simply a bunch of spineless idiots too dumb to stop following a dishonourable leader.  the only one from your fam who had brains and guts was DK.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 767

Re: 6405 vs 6403

everyone is entitled to their own opinion

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,295
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 6405 vs 6403

And my opinion is that being dishonorable has backfired upon 03

May your aim be true and don't forget to duck big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,047
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 6405 vs 6403

plataparadise is right with every thing he has said,

and with Ktiger he told us that he did not agree to your nap condintions, and who to belive i dont know, but this is the current situation we are in so we have to deal with it

gilmour999

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,865
  • Tag points: 17

Re: 6405 vs 6403

well what happened to all of KTiger's posts? lol.

you are a blind follower and KTiger has already admitted to playing around with words to make the other fam believe he signed a PNAP and then sought to break it. how much more evidence needs to be brought up for you to see the light?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points