You don't confuse me, you just disappoint me.

Pretending that my Libertarian views mean that I'm anti-government, anti-society, anti-currency, anti-free market free association is a stupid, gigantic straw-man. I have no problem with disagreeing with me. But to respond so childishly with nonsensical, obviously and indefensibly fallacious reasoning is just conceding that you don't have a legitimate response to my views and arguments.

I respond to your views as I honestly see them--and, of course, I invite you to correct me when I'm mistaken. That's what discussion is and why it works. Am I wrong in calling you a war-monger? Do you not support the US's recent actions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran (little farther back), Pakistan, Libya, and probably proposed military actions in Syria? If you don't, correct me, and maybe I won't call you a war-mongerer without regard for human life and justice.

I'm open to being corrected. I'm open to discussion. You're not. That's what differentiates us, more than our views. I'm talking about what you say and the thoughts you post here. You're responding to ridiculous views nobody could ever honestly think I held, as if in a political pitch to idiots hoping to win the support of the ignorant with lies and arguments which aren't a response to literally anything I've said.