So would you or would you not support using drones to combat drug trafficking/dealing/using? Or to assist you in fighting your closeted homosexual urges?

Way to dodge the questions.

Edit: For the record, you do not upset me. I've just had coffee and watched a film I enjoyed surprisingly very, very much. I'm in quite a good mood this morning. I'm not saying such awful things about you because you upset or anger me, but because I've really nothing else to say at this point. You've demonstrated, repeatedly for months, a completely juvenile and stupid personality which makes a mockery of this forum and any legitimate human discourse. You continue to now, worse than ever, now that I've called you on it.

You've asked for conversations on certain topics. You then refused to respond to any of what was presented, as you asked. Well enough. But to then childishly attack the intelligence of the poster whose content you were afraid/unable/unwilling to even respond to, in ANY way whatsoever? That's just stupid. It's ridiculous. It doesn't make any sense.

You continue to ignore completely content-driven posts. And you continue to arrogantly, childishly, embarrassingly insult me. I frequently disregard that you're childish, petty, and angry: I just respond to the topics. Whether you respond to the content I post, ignore me entirely, or whine that I upset you is your decision. You've obviously chosen to ignore my content entirely but whine, just as before. The childishness of this refusal to either engage me in conversation nor ignore me because you're obviously too childish to have an adult conversation without upsetting yourself is self-evident.

Option 1: Adult conversation.

(One example, one of many points you'd have responded to in ANY way:) You'd have explained to us how the 'drug war' achieving 0 reduction in usage (and subsequent harm) is worth countless billions and the lives of both law enforcement and collateral damage of violence created by the lucrative underground business of drug trafficing/dealing caused by illegalization. I made the argument that, because there's 0 evidence for reduction in drug usage rates from various case studies across the globe, there's no justification for our current drug policy. It wastes money. It kills people. It produces no results.

Which drugs are how harmful is irrelevant to this argument. Ranting vaguely about how pot ruins lives--which is the ONLY response you gave--is not a response to this argument. It's not a refutation even if all the bullshit you posted was true.

Obviously I wouldn't be predisposed to agree with your justification, but the fact is you haven't given us one to even consider. It's not that I disagree with you on anything; it's that you don't even respond to the topic at hand with what you disagree with and how/why, yet arrogantly cry as if you had and we just won't accept that you're right. It doesn't make any sense. Frankly, it's stupid.

Option 2: Ignore me entirely.

I suggest you take up this one, like xeno. Sometimes common sense and adult thoughts are just too much for intellectual lightweights whose parents raised them to be arrogant slobs nonetheless. Notice I've never called into question your intelligence. I tend to be detail-oriented and content-driven. Taking the obvious bait and making fun of you for your conduct and display of intellectual capacity would just be too easy and not further any discussion. Comments on the maturity and rational behind posting certain bizarre nonsense are not insults to your intelligence, they're attacks on what you've posted. Responding with why you do not agree it's bizarre nonsense would be legitimate discourse. Crying that someone called you out on stupid posts without any clarification/explanation/justification would not.

So you've given up making ANY attempt at all to respond to the content of my posts for months. The ONLY thing you've posted in response to me--for months--has been to cry that you hate evil libertarians and I'm trolling. That's not furthering discussion, so why not just ignore me entirely, since you refuse to reply to my actual posts?

Option 3: Ignore all content I post, but cry that I upset you

This is the option you've been taking for months. I really don't need to explain why this is stupid and childish. Say what you will about who's mocked, I really don't need to explain because you've spoken for yourself plenty already.

I'm not mad. I'm not angry. I'm not upset. You don't threaten me. But you do make me embarrassed to read this forum. You make me feel bad for you. It's pretty stupid. I suggest you ignore me and stop crying. Because the crying is pointless and embarrasses you, and the option of having a conversation with me seems far too difficult for you.

Edit 2: Sorry Mr. Yell, for the lengthy explanation. I appreciate that when we disagree it's simple and on-point. At your request I will promptly move this, if you please.