"he considers his knowledge and experience bank to be the grand sum of all human knowledge and experience and makes theories based on them, and places himself at the centre / most heroic position of the theory"
This accusation is unwarranted. When I have come to the point where I am not confident in my postulations, I indicate as such. I do, however, see conclusive evidence of the accuracy of my theories, subjective as they may be. I don't claim to have objective conclusive evidence of them.
"Obviously there is plenty wrong with the model in the first place, especially the assumption that only intelligent people are ethical and only ethical people are intelligent."
Nono. I made it clear that there were both evil and ethical genius types.
"people who are both ethical and intelligent are long term planners"
Problem with this is that evil genius types can also be long-term planners.
"the short-term thinkers are the ones that get into power"
Evidence of this? There are many positions of power, some held by long-term planners and some by short-term planners, the majority of whom, as evidenced by the sociological effect their plans have had on society overall, are either evil genius-types or unintelligent, which is in and of itself objective evidence (although not conclusive evidence mind you) of the veracity of my theory.
"The question becomes why haven't the intelligent + ethical people done anything about it"
Granted. This is the question; the whole point of the thread. Why do (people like Xeno) drink alcohol instead of doing something about it?
"the answer would be that this position in world history is new and that group of individuals have not collected their ideas and purpose into a collective voice yet, and it is possible that they never will, if because the evolution of our society is towards a greedier, more individualistic model"
I would like to add, " and, overall, a less intelligent human species."