Einstein:
"Go ask people around you, are you voting for Mitt or Paul." "Nuff sais there."
...What? Obama was elected into office, so he's clearly the best? Our current/previous leaders got us massively into debt with unsustainable welfare programs; but they did get elected, so they're clearly the best?
"A libertarian would allow an explosives laden truck to be driven by an 18 year old new driver with 20 hours of constant driving through your neighborhood because they are anti-regulation."
Stupid straw-man argument. No, they wouldn't.
"If Kemp drove a truck for 1 year he would come back here, apologize to me, renounce Libertarianism, and embrace Conservatism."
For someone who doesn't know that "you're" and "your" are different words with different meanings, you're awfully cocky. For someone who literally will not respond to a single point I make, you're awfully cocky. For someone who frequently abandons threads when he's been explained indisputably to have made absolutely false claims, you're awfully cocky. For someone who just name-calls and cannot back up his name-calling, you're awfully cocky.
You haven't, even once, ATTEMPTED to argue for conservative (ie social, anti-drug, anti-homosexual) values vs libertarian values. To every point I made in favor of Libertarian values, you didn't respond to a single one. It takes a lot of intellectual cowardice and childish arrogance to follow that up with appeals to authority (If you did what I did, if you knew what I do....) that damnit, you know better. You can't/won't ever actually explain your position or respond to nearly ANYTHING I say, but damnit, you know better!
We're on a discussion forum. Give it up. If you can't even make a case, even a poor one, you've got nothing. You haven't even tried. Not on any topic Libertarians disagree with Conservatives on. Not once, given all of my posts and responses and explanations.
It's gotten just stupid, because you've literally conceded everything I've said on every Libertarian topic. You've responded to absolutely NONE of the many points I've made regarding drug policy, homosexuality, or Ron Paul (to the extent that he ties into Libertarianism) for more than a month. Yet you continually run from those discussions and come back later with more stupid straw-man beating marathons as if Libertarians are inherently against DUI laws or antibiotics. You run from every discussion without responding to a single argument or point yet come back later with arrogant whining about how Libertarians are every misspelled bad word you can think of.
Not once have you responded to arguments and points made in their favor against your positions. Not once. Yet you keep spamming/trolling a discussion forum arrogantly/ignorantly/stupidly/embarrassingly as if you have.
Cougar,
perezhilton.com is absolute trash. Newt Gingrich IS absolute garbage, but the first ignorant whining I read when I clicked that link disgusted me. There ARE cultural problems predominant in poor black communities in America. Some of these problems ARE far more prevalent in black communities than most Asian communities and some "Latino" communities. Acknowledging and discussing these CULTURAL issues is not racist.
Again, Gingrich is a phony, trashy, unprofessional dipshit. But to ignorantly pretend that talking about the cultural differences predominant among Asian/black poor communities which give Asians much more upward mobility is not racist. It's not even a bad thing. Mr. Hilton is an idiotic, trashy, unprofessional dipshit as well. Maybe Gingrich has said dumb racist things (I could hardly care less, since I already despise him), but Mr. Hilton's ignorant trash is intellectually offensive and morally disgusting.
Edit: Gingrich's english is even terribly poor/ambiguous (or maybe just wrong) in the first quote. But his point [in that quote] isn't racist, it's cultural.
[I wish I could obey forum rules]