Again, you meant "you're." Learning English will aid you in discussion with the language.

Libertarians support freedom. Libertarians do not support drug abuse any more than conservatives; they're just honest enough to accept the facts of the topic. Since you refuse to address them, there's no sense in repeating them here. They've been presented to you and you've childishly refused to address them in any way whatsoever.

I was simply pointing out that Tea Party support comes from people supporting Libertarian economic ideals. Tea Party support isn't coming from people whose primary motivation is a belief that government should give a damn about sexuality. Tea Party support isn't coming from people whose primary motivation is a belief that we need to waste more human lives and billions of dollars on a failed drug war.

Tea Party support comes from people whose primary motivation is a belief that government should be limited in the scope of its taxation and economic control. On this most important topic tea party and Libertarian ideas agree--Many Libertarians support/are part of the Tea Party movement. Were more attention given to the fact that Scott Walker is anti same-sex hospital visitation rights, his support would fall. If the Tea Party came out and took this stand, its support would fall. Most people are more secure in their sexuality than you; they're not afraid that, without laws against it, they might turn gay.

Your personal attacks are just childish and stupid. It's embarrassing how angry and senseless you get over Libertarian ideals. You absolutely refuse to discuss topics and yet accuse me of not being able make an argument or debate. That's just stupid.