You're making vague generalizations on topics Libertarians do not necessarily agree on. You can't argue against Libertarian ideals because you clearly have no idea what they are.

You're asserting that conservatives/liberals are some sort of alternatives which aren't a bunch of corrupt corporate-whores who war-monger on command, which they are.

You're ignoring the people killed and otherwise oppressed by your war-monger corporate-whore masters, as if they do not incur costs to be weighed against those you accuse libertarianism of here.

I would love to respond more thoughtfully, but you're just trolling. You've made it explicitly clear that you will absolutely not respond to posts made on this topic.

hashbrowns, too

That's odd... I seem to remember Wilson and FDR were at the helm.

Damn they must have edited history books again...

I made an argument against Ron Paul, I submitted evidence as needed, and I did not leave any punches out.

You made accusations, treated them as universak truisms without evidence, and expect all to follow you to the pot of gold at the end of a rainbow.

> That's odd... I seem to remember Wilson and FDR were at the helm.

Flint, visit your history book(s) again. Presidents between 1921 and 1933 were Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover.

For the record, the attempt to associate either party with pacifism in this particular thread is probably a strawman argument.

1: Whether it was Republicans or Democrats that were the instigators of pacifism during that period, it doesn't change the question of whether pacifism was a good or bad idea.
2: Even if it somehow matters for the merits of pacifism, you're both talking about the parties as they were literally 90 years ago.  Considering that about 99.99% of the people who had any sort of influence, including voting, in the 1920s elections are probably long gone, there's not really a common link between their policies then and their policies now.

Now, I understand the period as an empirical example of pacifism in action, don't get me wrong there.  But this whole debate of which party was the pacifist party is pretty much useless.