101

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

my two cents.

if you want a fair war as your family stated you wanted, you dont cheat on saving as much before canceling. but thats fine, all fams save before a war, not much to do about it. both fams eco was about the same so it wouldve really been a skill contest due to the silly amount of shares. but when you find out that we cant actually have any attackers online to fight the fight at the time you had set, you need to be more flexible which by the logs i saw you guys werent. and since it wouldve been easy planets then. it was the smartest move to take the agreement, not like us attackers enjoy just sitting around. but now we really have to make the most of it these last two weeks without silly amounts of damage. tho from what i heared we got offered the nap, not asking or begging for it. i wasnt there but thats what i heard.

when you guys cancelled 93 was bound to jump in at some point. either after 1 family had won and had no fleets or savings left or while fight was still ongoing, as it is the easiest way to get planets and they couldve saved up  what they needed. again, not fair if you wanna make an interesting fight. this shouldve been a 1v1v1 fight imo opinion, all three fams going at eachother. and it would suck being in the fam that gets hit the hardest, but thats life tongue

my only true enemy is my ego.

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Whoever in 96 pulled off a free pnap like that is already diplomat if the round tbh tongue

Good in nature, but evil by our own free will. Incestuously created by the will to kill

My IC-Wiki Page

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

they should make an end round change that allows allies tongue

Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does. --Sartre

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

lol.. its all fine.. and 04 dont worry we will put up as much of a fight as 96.. u may have us outsaved but theirs no giving up here.. we win we win we lose we lose... GL people and time and ticking

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

If you put up as much as a fight as 96 than im worried.
Their surrender was somewhat of a joke, this is what i dislike about top families. The whole round your napped, and than at the end of the round you break the nap and before the countdown has even ended you already got a new nap in place...

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

+1

Watch out Banana, its pedo bear !!!!!! =O

[18:19] <Nick> i would be the best homosexual ever

107 (edited by {Black Mafia} IC Death 03-May-2012 07:30:24)

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

umm i ment earlier in the round when kollop told us about how 96 was massive clearing u.. and they forced u to NAP..Nakushita.. how can u say its a joke and u accepted the NAP? lol u complain about it canceling and resigning when ur fam is the one who offered the NAP and Accepted it.. more like a double standard in my opinion

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

I'm not sure what kollop told you, but 96 has never mass cleared us.
Infact the "conflict" we had with 96 wassn't even worth mentioning really, here and there a attack.  They didn't force us anything and certainly not a nap so no idea what you've been smoking IC death but clearly something iligal.

My fam says 96 asked for the Pnap.

So someone is telling lies, being it my fam or being it 96.
Pretty sure you got some inside intell on both fams.

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

yup yup.. i do got intel from both.. and i heard from ur fam that one of u offered NAP 96 accepted.. i mean its not a biggie just had to speak on it when u said how u dislike top fams thats cancel NAP and resign NAP and ur one of the top families who did is all

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Funny, than I'm being lied to, but i dont really trust your word so im not taking it serious yet.

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Trolling level: IC_Death

tongue tongue tongue

"Sorry I'm late, I'm afraid I got lost on the path of life."

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

> Aldon wrote:

> Trolling level: IC_Death

tongue tongue tongue


awwww poor donald =p

Watch out Banana, its pedo bear !!!!!! =O

[18:19] <Nick> i would be the best homosexual ever

113 (edited by TCO511 03-May-2012 12:28:47)

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Though i had allready told kollop that 'there were other options', i had not yet mentioned the nap thing when he left chat. Then i got this :

Week 47, 20Reply Save
would you guys be willing to pay us some planets for a pnap?
Signed, Shazam of Large Trout (#6204)

So, yeah, 04 was first in proposing a remaking of the nap. Not that i minded at all, to be honest smile And of course i deserve diplomat of the round award, duh, we were outsaved and wouldve had no attackers online at start of the war, and gave them enough to think about so they would come with this proposal. Get your votes in ladies and gents big_smile

When speaking your mind, it is of utmost importance to keep using it !

114

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Snap!

my only true enemy is my ego.

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Even though I do not agree on their policy, 6200 should take that award home.

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Damn 04 wankers!

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Taking pity on the weak doesn't mean you give them "best diplo" award with it. tongue

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

told u nakushita lol i had no reason to lie but okay lol..

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Your not to be trusty IC death.

It even says so in the tic passing.