Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Justing Bieber lives here!


truth!


and i'm most likely to attrack 99% of the attacks/nukes sad

Haters gonna hate!

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

phunny with all this loven in here and luv is not to bee seen, perhaps she got insomnia?

me bizt daz

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Arby your planets just look so tasty i just wanna eat em NOM NOM NOM.

What can i say i'm just that good.

Original member of The Destroyer Of Worlds
MW rnd 18-21

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

yikes

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Our relations with TheOneGang (6196) have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 28 weeks.

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Please raid arby....

Read-Learn-Win
First and Foremost.... DON'T trust them!
Second, rip out their hearts.
Third, saute said heart in butter, with a tad of cream and mushrooms with a tad of celery and onion.
Fourth, serve with white wine.

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

> SLS wrote:

> Please raid arby....

Depends how fast the Flunitrazepam we ordered comes in.

The Belief that one's Own View of reality is the only Reality of the most dangerous of all delusions.

I'll be back and next time ill bring a stronger hamster.

I'm so desensitized, it's gotta be just completely bananas to get me off. - Carl Brutananadilewski

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

> NaKuShItA wrote:

> Our relations with TheOneGang (6196) have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 28 weeks.


what about that? big_smile is that relevant?

my only true enemy is my ego.

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

it is spanking time when that timer runs out!

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

are you sure?

my only true enemy is my ego.

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

oh my Arby even more planets now. mmmmmmm I'm gonna savor this one.

What can i say i'm just that good.

Original member of The Destroyer Of Worlds
MW rnd 18-21

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Yes gard! Sure i am!

Not sure what fam does the spanking yet.

38 (edited by TCO511 02-May-2012 00:35:12)

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Week 45, 20Send Another MessageSave
I hereby cancel the 72h NAP between us as was signed by you and me. As you have no VLs i only sent this to you. Attacks and ops can start in 72 ticks. Good luck and have fun ! smile
Sent to Yup of Sailfish (#6204)


This in compliance with :

72 hour NAP between 6204 and 6196

Standard NAP rules. There is a 72 ingame weeks or 72 real life hours cancellation period, starting after a notification has been sent to the leader and all vice-leaders of the other family. Each family gets a 104 system core the other family cannot enter, as detailed below.
Planets will be traded with a maximum of 10 per week

6204 CORE :

xxx

104 planets

6196 CORE :

xxx

104 planets

Signed for 6196, TheConfusedOne
Signed for 6204, Kollop

When speaking your mind, it is of utmost importance to keep using it !

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

VL and all 96 have been informed in HQ with cancellation countdown+war thread.
Attacks will start in 18 ticks!
It would be sad that 96 refuses that nice challenge trying to find loopholes

'Success! The realm of Genesis has been reduced to dust! Our forces are leaving the planet though, as it is scheduled for demolition to make way for a new hyperspace bypass.'

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

They canceled and now they want to cancel the war too? When they cancel they have no loopholes left to hide in and no time to dig new ones either.

me bizt daz

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Its not a loophole. You made a mistake, now own up and live with it. The nap in relations was only there to reinforce the nap both you and me signed. You did not comply with nap cancellation terms, so nap is still in effect. It's not even like we're trying to get out from under it, we're just moving the war to a time more fitting to us. Small price to pay for making a mistake i'd think.

And as a fam with 3 mods, you should know that 'assuming' is never a good thing. If a player breaks a rule because he hasnt read the rules and 'assumes' he was doing nothing wrong, it's still breaking the rules, since you're supposed to read the rules. If you sign a nap, and want to cancel it, you're supposed to read it, which you failed to do. Assuming you cancelled a nap doesnt make it so.

When speaking your mind, it is of utmost importance to keep using it !

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

My planets are safe! One way or another! big_smile

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Oh! I get it. This is a publicity stunt. You guys are brilliant, bringing more hype for this war. smile

Ekoe
"Call me the best"

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Hey TCO, care yo enlighten us about the time of war?

Because.. us idiots.. figured 72 hours are actually 72 hours.

So when should we start raping you?

Please share, thanks.

Haters gonna hate!

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

oh now i got it clear, they wanted us to warn them when they canceled the nap ! nice try but 72 hours are and will always be 72 hours so be prepared to go scouting

me bizt daz

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

SLS wrote:

Please raid arby....

yikes

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

47 (edited by Remo 02-May-2012 04:55:11)

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

All he is saying is that nap terms clearly state that leader and all VL's were to be messaged upon cancelling the nap, that never happened so what he is saying, is according to the nap terms, even though it was cancelled in relations, the NAP was never actually officially cancelled because not all NAP cancellation procedures were followed. There is absolutely no reason to crucify him just because he is carefully reading the nap terms that were signed by both sides.

<&InSaNe> so for reference tco has a ticklish bumhole
<@SerialBusiness> good to know. I will make a note of this

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

hi remo tongue

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

Hey Gen

<&InSaNe> so for reference tco has a ticklish bumhole
<@SerialBusiness> good to know. I will make a note of this

Re: 6204 Vs 6196

no mad retaking this time ok buddy? X(