You generalize about all drugs as if pot is heroin, meth, crack, etc. This is not an indicator of education or expertise; it's an indicator of the opposite. You claimed that pot was significantly more harmful than alcohol. That's just laughable. If I have to explain, explaining is pointless; because you're clearly willing to deny reality in order to maintain your dogma.

You ignore statistics regarding decriminalization and usage rates. This is not an indicator of education or expertise; it's an indicator of the opposite. All of the knowledge of drug users' mentalities is useless if what you support doesn't reduce usage rates. Great, you're a great saint who wants to save people from drugs. So you support spending billions and getting people killed in order to... have 0 impact on usage rates? You're not even arguing your position. You haven't responded to this simple fact one time in weeks.

You ignore the fact that knowing you is irrelevant. Your case needs to stand on its own, not on an appeal to authority. You claim I dismiss you "out of hand without a clue." This is just a gem, considering that I've responded to every silly, ignorant "argument" you've posted; and you've literally ignored every single one of mine, including the ones that decimate your position and even vilify you for supporting the pointless waste of billions and tens of thousands of deaths. Even pointing out that what you support gets tons of people killed doesn't illicit a response. You must know you have a weak case to let even that slide.

"He tries to dismiss with a tainted site drug related crashes. Excuse me but Marijuana causes halucigens and while it speeds the blood rate up it slows the mind down. "

Your argument is bullshit and we both know it. This is a concession both of your total defeat and that you're trolling. I could find dozens more articles and academic studies showing it. I've explained it. Your ignorant (because they're false) claims don't change reality. What garbage.

Repeating that you have a small amount of experience with addicts -- purely from their perspective and not one of study -- is not an argument. I've made many. You've responded to none, choosing instead to repeat yourself that I'm stupid and god damnit you're an expert. If you're never going to respond to a single argument against your position, face it: You've conceded, facing the facts is unpleasant, and we're done.

No wonder this topic upsets you. You're committed to believing a bunch of complete falsehoods and reality confronts you constantly. Why the hell would you bring it up on a forum? This is just embarrassing.

In your "what do you call" hilarity, you left out that you're the bedroom police and you care about other people's junk. Because in the face of the economy of hundreds of millions and people's very lives (warfare), bedroom policing is really on that level and needs federal attention. Additionally, you left out the fact that your "drug war" is wasteful and gets people killed. In weeks you've never responded to this simple argument.

It's clear now that you're angry at libertarians because you can't argue an even half decent case in defense of your positions against theirs. You haven't even attempted to respond to a single one of my arguments on drugs in weeks. You don't even mention homosexuality because you won't dare respond to a single one of my arguments on that topic either.

You're just mad because I'm relatively Libertarian and Libertarians alone can call you a sheep and a corporate whore. You support whoever big government conservatives tell you to support, just as socialists support whoever big government liberals tell them to support. You actually believe that conservative vs liberal is the real dynamic in Amerika as each side edges us closer and closer to tyranny with more bailouts and bribes than history will ever be able to accurately document. You're too worried about other guys' dicks and a couple of joints to see the big picture.

You could argue that hard drugs are just too harmful and we, as a society, need to stand for our values in outlawing them. You could argue this is worth billions and even thousands of human lives. This is just an example of an argument you could make which I would completely respect.

But you're either too lazy or cowardly to even state a case. In weeks you haven't responded to a single argument I've made or position I've stated. In weeks you haven't provided justifications/explanations for your positions as I've questioned them. You repeatedly claim that you've been homeless, so you're an expert. You repeatedly claim that a multitude of obvious studies must be wrong -- though you give no explanation -- because you have a 2 year degree.

LOL