Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

Yes the US decided to leave while we were wtfpwning the Vietnamese.

We destroyed the NVA entirely. A million man army crushed by less than 100k soldiers and some aircraft.

We took out so much Viet Cong as to be silly for them to have kept it up. We also took some out from Russia, China, and Cambodia for interfering in the war.

By making a 'do not cross' barrier we decided the entire war.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

I am not trolling, but I would like to know how you win a war against political ideals? I guess you could kill all the North Vietnamese (which the total dead in Vietnam was almost 10% of the total population), and I do not disagree that the US withdrawl was from the lack of public support back home, but I also would also go as far as to say that they weren't winning the war either.

When the tactics of the US was to designate large areas of Vietnam as free fire zones (meaning any killing of civilians went unquestioned), the public support in Vietnam is easily shifted from supporting US assistance to opposing their tactics which forces the shift (do you support the people coming into Vietnam killing civilians, which the assisting forces did? or do you support the people fighting them?). I think victory itself in Vietnam would have been difficult, not impossible, but certainly wouldn't have been swift.

The Vietnam War did have some successful battles, but not exactly planned, but the Battle of Long Tan was certainly well executed.

One I would add to the list is the Kakoda Trail. The operation to stop the Japanese advance in WW2 (and from what I hear, was actually the first time in WW2 the Japanese forces were actually stopped).

I give your invention the worst score imaginable. An A minus MINUS!
~Wornstrum~

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

If you occupy everywhere the enemy can seek refuge, everywhere they spread propoganda, and hold it convincingly you stop the movement.

Examples of such successes: Phillipines, Tibet, Western Germany, Eastern Bloc.

Eventually man will seek freedom from tyranny, which is why the Eastern Bloc collapsed, but it held long enough to prove the rule.

That's why you can never allow the enemy a safe haven, why wars should be total and entire.


Examples of failed wars, where both sides were left standing abound... and the follow on wars resulting from such failed wars.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

29 (edited by The Yell 25-Mar-2012 05:51:59)

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xfi4s8cjLFI

ps He's right

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

~Wornstrum~, what you reference was also the result of retarded civilians in command back home. tongue

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

V.kemp

Biden might be bad, but remmember the alernative was palin lol tongue easy choice althou neither is desireable

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

I'd rather Palin than Biden by a large margin.

Both were inexperienced (county council and senate don't exactly a competent executive make), but Palin was less of a socialist. tongue

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

Lol u must be kidding me about Palin tho.. she would have been a loose cannon on deck and would honestly make a mockery of the administration

LORD HELP OREGON

34 (edited by V.Kemp 25-Mar-2012 11:29:47)

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

...as opposed to what Biden is doing?

Is it lost on you that he's the laughing stock of the world? He acts like he's drunk all of the time. And he's a moron. He's an embarrassment. I don't doubt Palin would too, but it's not a given that she'd be worse than Biden. He sets the bar for embarrassment really, really high.

I'm not suggesting I want to see Palin as anything, let alone a VP. But what part of she has executive experience Biden lacks and her gaffes aren't as bad as Biden's don't you understand? Maybe you think she's said dumber stuff because of your socialistic leanings? That's legit. But it's silly to pretend there's no contest.

I'm sick and tired of retards who hear a lot of Palin jokes and presume she's the biggest moron on the planet and everybody knows it. They can't think for themselves. They shouldn't talk about politics with anyone. Ever. Or vote. I'm not a Palin fan, but give me a break. She's not the dumbest person who ever ran for office and it's certainly not a given that she'd be more embarrassing than Biden.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

I think people are getting the idea of the Vietnam war wrong as well. This was not an invasion of North Vietnam to conquer them. It was a defense of South Vietnam to protect them. The US had achieved that and was actually making a push to switch their ideal in the war to conquering North Vietnam up until the point where politics back stateside became and issue and the troops were called out. The North Vietnamese only strategy in that war was to throw as many numbers as they could at opposing forces and hope for victory. That is not some sort of brilliant strategy that is just using sheer odds in your favor (which they still did not have).

If the US was to use that tactic in any war current day and lose the ratio of troops that North Vietnam did, the entire political panel would be crucified. Why? Because it is horrible ideology and the American public while preferring not to see so many deaths on the enemy side would NEVER stand for massive casualties on its own side.

Solis - #7872

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

Palin made a bigger fool of herself after only being running candidate than biden have after years in office

LORD HELP OREGON

37 (edited by V.Kemp 26-Mar-2012 03:31:47)

Re: Biden: "Most ambitious military plan in 500 years"

Noir, you're incoherent.

Regarding Vietnam, I was thinking more of politicians ordering soldiers to make priority lists of a hundred targets and to start at the bottom. Bizarre [spit] like that got people killed and made the US far less effective than it could have been if only politicians hadn't been in command.

Reminds me of Obama commanding forces. "Dear enemies, we're going to withdraw on [such and such a date]. Prepare to take control then. Thanks."

[I wish I could obey forum rules]