Re: The Revolution poll

each fam should have a poll, if 90% of the fam sayes that one player is screwing it up for the fam the leader must be able to activate a instant kick button so that fams can have a better start..

Dutch bastard

Re: The Revolution poll

revolutions generally are against the leader....just sayin

Solis - #7872

Re: The Revolution poll

;P don't care about the name... just make it so that fam can vote a player out of the fam.. each round again multiple fams have multis in em .. no fun like that

Dutch bastard

Re: The Revolution poll

nah

If that player doesn't attack/op his own fam then he shouldnt be killed off... everyone has a right to play this game the way they want.

Re: The Revolution poll

this is like a facist poll not a revolution poll

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

Re: The Revolution poll

kick him out, not kill him.


What about having fans that are reserved for SS players? So that at the beginning of the round or when your signing up and you don't want to be part of a team you select one of those.

Anything worth living for, is worth dying for.
And anything worth dying for, is certainly worth living for.

Re: The Revolution poll

Manticore wrote:

kick him out, not kill him.

That's how it starts!! Also, did you mention SS? The plot thickens...

Re: The Revolution poll

so... mutiny poll smile

Leap ahead

Re: The Revolution poll

i vote mutiny against mods, up the revolution!

Re: The Revolution poll

and SS has no place in this game if 11 out of 12 players are playing fam oriented. Not a shot in hell I let an SS'er stay alive in my fams...

Solis - #7872

Re: The Revolution poll

exactly, and if someone wants to be an ss player, then they won't mind not taking up a spot of a valuable player.


12 people per FAM, having 2-3 ss players can put you in a significant disadvantage compared to fans that have all their people active.

Anything worth living for, is worth dying for.
And anything worth dying for, is certainly worth living for.

Re: The Revolution poll

"exactly, and if someone wants to be an ss player, then they won't mind not taking up a spot of a valuable player."

That's the dumbest thing I have ever heard...of course they mind because they are being kicked out and unable to play (they get kicked out after they start, only to rejoin and the same thing happen). With dwindling numbers, do you really want to kick out more people? At this rate, we will have SS SD all the time because of the lack of players. We all have times that we are not able to play actively, and being an SS still allows players to be involved without the need to always be on to aid out and being on constantly during wars...

I give your invention the worst score imaginable. An A minus MINUS!
~Wornstrum~

Re: The Revolution poll

There is difference between SS and inactiveness forced SS play.

Its a family based game and I think everyone should try to play with the family they land in.

Other wise they can wait for SS rounds to pop up and play then.

"I lie down next to an angel, fall asleep and fly with the demons"
I once prayed to god for some planets, but quickly found out he didnt work that way

Re: The Revolution poll

Precisely Poley.

If they want to play a game where being solo is the thing, then either play SD or find another game. That may be harsh but it is the truth. I did not play this game 10 years because I like the single player version. I played it cause I loved working as a team with other people.

Solis - #7872

Re: The Revolution poll

I suggested a few fans in each galaxy that are put in as SS and players chose if thats their style of play. Why would you try to force people who don't want to play as a team, in to a team that wants team players?

The SS players are not reliable in war planning nor are they in line for jumps etc...  Keeping a family exclusively for SS players would remove some of the problems. I was the leader of a smaller family last round, and we build up to a respectable rank even though we had less active players. SS players through forced inactivity is different then a player who is unreliable in every situation.


Most FAMS will remove the ss player as soon as possible so in turn ruining the players round as well, well the option is to give the players a choice, SS FAM or Normal FAM. Go to the first one, you are playing with people who are not team players thus can't depend much on them, go to the second one, you commit to be a team player.

Why punish the 8 or 9 active team players in a FAM by putting 3 ss players who are unreliable? This in some situation might cost the game good players. Instead we have FAM types that appeal to every player style.

Anything worth living for, is worth dying for.
And anything worth dying for, is certainly worth living for.