• Posts: 6,734
  • Tag points: 34

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

Ha! 64 only beat 59 by a few figs and a crashed fleet. If not for that, the 64/59 war would have probably ended differently. I blame myself for both noob mistakes. I was just trying to be like my hero Flashy.

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

Week 13, 13Reply Save
lol

your fam was out of our range

good luck getting farmed now
Signed, Nightwish of ND Ashura (#5853)



-----------------

Week 13, 13Send Another MessageSave
lol with ur shitty attackers? good luck
Sent to Nightwish of ND Ashura (#5853)
--------------

feels good to be right haha

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,436
  • Tag points: 23

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

smile

had to keep the bluff going didnt I? yikes

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

still dont see a reason for deletion though, its not like ur fam was getting beat on that much, just a raid as far as i remember.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

55 Reply by Lee (edited by Lee 06-Mar-2012 10:19:33)

  • Lee
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,649
  • Tag points: 58

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

> Superbad wrote:

> lawl, let's not pretend you guys "beat" anybody since our only attacker doesn't really know how to attack. We all knew that our family couldn't beat a family half our size which is why I asked NW to PNAP everybody in the galaxy big_smile

64 is clearly the best in PW. They could've just as easily raped us as 59 did. They took a free PNAP despite being outsaved by a lot is a pretty good strategic move (not knowing our attacking strength, or lack there of).


yes ur right, i wanted to fight you on that war. the fam didnt wanna risk it being outsaved by 2x....i knew it was possible X(

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

56 Reply by ]PW[ Forever (edited by ~* Forever 06-Mar-2012 10:46:31)

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

> Arby3 wrote:

> Haha, we were hoping you were going to be inactive...then you spread around the core like herpes. Nobody was in range, and I wasn't demo fleet and rc's just to clear you.



Sentinel?

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,199
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

Forever!

Maar doodslaan deed hij niet, want tussen droom en daad,
Staan wetten in de weg en praktische bezwaren,
En ook weemoedigheid, die niemand kan verklaren,
En die des avonds komt, wanneer men slapen gaat.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,555
  • Tag points: 90

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

Hi RD smile, I dont play the main Galaxies anymore, just playing SD for fun (not that I'm having any lol).

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,734
  • Tag points: 34

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

[quote=~* Forever

Modestus Experitus

Arby: A very strict mod, reminds me of a fat redneck who drives a truck around all day with a beer in one hand. I hated this guy at the start, however, I played a round in PW with him where he went as an anonymous player. Our fam got smashed up and everyone pretty much left. Arby stayed around and helped out the remaining family. At the end of the round he revealed himself.... My views on him have changed since. Your a good guy.....

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,199
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

Aww that's too bad forever D:. PW needs some good players again. It's bad enough that Lee is getting his 3rd consequetive round win, but when Arby3 is one of the most succesful attackers in a round you know something's wrong!

Maar doodslaan deed hij niet, want tussen droom en daad,
Staan wetten in de weg en praktische bezwaren,
En ook weemoedigheid, die niemand kan verklaren,
En die des avonds komt, wanneer men slapen gaat.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,436
  • Tag points: 23

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

Week 21, 19    Electric storms
Electric storms, casted from The Tower, are haunting our empire. Expect a lot of citizen to die in the coming weeks.

lol Teddy is being the fun guy yikes

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 782

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

easyway is entirely to active im starting to wonder if he ever leaves his computer lol.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,172

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

our attackers were so bad that caused the rest of our family to only infrawhore and log in once a day because we knew there's no chance of winning.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,363

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

53 is going down for being cowards and NAPing 64! smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,295
  • Tag points: 3

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

our sole purpose this round is to manipulate the top 3 to our will...we haven't failed thus far

May your aim be true and don't forget to duck big_smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,172

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

for being cowards? it's a strategic move knowing that we had no attackers, motivation nor activity.

lawl.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,363

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

you were cowards, you cancelled on THEM and than you realise outta the blue that u have no attackers? Its bs. You got bullied into re-napping them and u started farming the losers of the 64 vs 59 war. Thats low and your cowards. If you had no attackers, u wouldnt have started hitting 59 either!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

68 Reply by Superbad (edited by Superbad 06-Mar-2012 21:08:14)

  • Posts: 1,172

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

lol ask Nightwish, I was an advocate of PNAPing the entire galaxy all round.

In fact, I didn't even know why/when we cancelled. smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

69 Reply by MedicineMan (edited by MedicineMan 06-Mar-2012 21:26:39)

  • Posts: 496

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

> Teddy[M] wrote:

> you were cowards, you cancelled on THEM and than you realise outta the blue that u have no attackers? Its bs. You got bullied into re-napping them and u started farming the losers of the 64 vs 59 war. Thats low and your cowards. If you had no attackers, u wouldnt have started hitting 59 either!

You obviously weren't around for the case of chronic whiner syndrome Lee contracted when we cancelled on him.

Boy did that ever cause a migraine...

" and than you realise outta the blue that u have no attackers?"

I'll let the grammar slide.  You're wrong.  Our only attacker (Tornado) has a primadonna-esque tantrum and rage quits because all of a sudden we're on the back foot as 59 turns their full attention to us.  He can't stand seeing his net planet count falling so he pussies out on us, leaving us to fight a losing battle that 59 refuse to end because it's too easy for them.

If you're going to call anyone a coward, call him one.

And I'd just like to point out that the definition of vulture has taken some rather convenient twisting this round.

59 raid into and portal within our core while we're in the middle of warring 60 is not considered vulturing.

We clear 59 top attacker's portals (note, I said "clear" we did NOT use them to run their fleet before taking) from right next to our core while they're jumping for the 64 war is considered vulturing.

Convenient much?

Words will always retain their power.  Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen: the enunciation of truth.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,230
  • Tag points: 1

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

We never purposely tried to get into your core. 53 along with 60/61/54/57 all cleared me as soon as or the same tick our war started with 64. I never said you guys were vultures, I would have probably done the same. I can't blame anyone for doing it either, because if you hadn't cleared me, you were next on the menu. So I have no issues with that really. Yeah it pisses me off to get cleared by 5-6 different families the second we start a war, but what can you do?

The problem is, as soon as 53 got their PNAP with 64, your "awesome" attacker started exploring into our core and we cleared 1 planet. Yeah we were in a war with 65 at the time, but there's no ignoring the large attacker from the largest family exploring in your core no matter if your in war or not. But you guys decided us clearing 1 planet was means enough to declare on us and start clearing, not just systems but everything within 5 ticks of any of your systems. So I have no pity for you now 53. I msg your attacker to back off or he was gonna destroy his whole family, but the fool wouldn't listen. Typical suck ass attacker being given 10 mil NW and thinks he's the shit because he can overpower attackers who are tied up with other more important things. Like you said MedicineMan, your attacker sucked BIGTIME. So why fund him to keep doing what he was doing if you knew he sucked and you knew it was gonna end up badly for you? I think you underestimated what my fam could do and now your hosed.

"The market is like a.....game within a game Teddy"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

71 Reply by Superbad (edited by Superbad 06-Mar-2012 21:46:33)

  • Posts: 1,172

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

The people in our fam with a brain wanted to war because we were bored, the rest without brains overestimated themselves and underestimated you guys. Either way I knew this "war" was retarded to begin with but it is what it is.

tornado was one of the worst attacker I've ever played with lol. I had to beg him to attack by literally sending him a list of systems for him. Wiwi went inactive with no notice. That's all of the attackers we had all round smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,199
  • Tag points: 19

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

After what 53 tried to pull on my fam (64), I think they deserve a bit of ass whooping...

The only part about it that I don't like, is that I'm not the one giving out the whooping to them >:(.

Maar doodslaan deed hij niet, want tussen droom en daad,
Staan wetten in de weg en praktische bezwaren,
En ook weemoedigheid, die niemand kan verklaren,
En die des avonds komt, wanneer men slapen gaat.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 6,052
  • Tag points: 69

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

We never purposely tried to get into your core. 53 along with 60/61/54/57 all cleared me as soon as or the same tick our war started with 64

57 denies it! We've been clearing you from the start when you get too close... You strikes back, we striked back then we napped? or didnt we? Anyways later you guys attacked us again after my leader took planets from you and it was a well struck.... We never touched you just before war with 64 only when you're spreading around like a disease to set up on 64 but it was too close to my liking but at that point no war whatsoever was mentioned big_smile

BTW if it makes you feel better tomorrow we're getting our asses kicked so you can consider it some sort of payback tongue

True LEGEND

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,230
  • Tag points: 1

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

Well I missed the first 4 weeks of the round, so not sure what happened before I got into 59. big_smile

"The market is like a.....game within a game Teddy"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 496

Re: 5859 vs 5865 and 5853

> Spam wrote:

>  Like you said MedicineMan, your attacker sucked BIGTIME. So why fund him to keep doing what he was doing if you knew he sucked and you knew it was gonna end up badly for you?

Because that's what you do in a family.  You work together.  I have to admit I was for the 59 war, but if I'd known what a complete wuss our attacker was going to turn in to I would have opposed it.

Call it the naive-ishness of a noob tongue

Words will always retain their power.  Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen: the enunciation of truth.

0 Dislike 0 Post Points