> Noir wrote:

> lol rin what u mean underdog could be fun

> Lee is always underdog!

not in pw! apparently hes won the last 2 rounds

LOL Rin, seriously? Damn someone need to teach the crowd in PW aparently

Lame duck with a side of wuss sauce. 59 lost to 64 because of lee's advantage in figs. We could have drug it on further, but it would have destroyed both of us. We hit their infra hard for 32 hours before they were finnaly in a position to return the favor. Our only real loss was fleet and poor old man Rickings 500 planets that got blown. 64 took a huge hit on their eco.

64 fights well. If you want a good, legit war, at least give them a week to recover and have a fighting chance.

Oh and the NAP cancellation is just downright disrespectful in terms of timing.

So... in order to not make us break nap on you, you force us in a position where one of the few possibilities for a good lookout is a nap void/break? (although I'm against it, personally)

Thanks, Naku.  We will

I am not saying anyone is dishonourable! I am mearly stating that if we go by the post means you could hit us even with out warning this way we se it coming! I actually left the game 6-7 years ago due to the fact that IC had no honour! I have played with both , honourable and dishonourable and to wait for soeone to sneak attack you when you expect it is a stupid move considering how much dishonour there has been in the past! I myself am nt sure if i know Lee or not but when i read that he doesnt care about naps, i have to wonder how much he can be trusted!

to Risingdown  if you thought there was a chance that one of  the top 2 f amilies would break nap to attack you,  would you give them the chance to build more stuff to do it to you with? and just sit back and wait or would you do as we did? we ddint attack when you were warring and we did give some time we could of cancelled when you were warring so as soon as you were done we could attack, have seen it happen to my family in the past!

in any respect of when its been cancelled may be underhand, but it gives no excuse for a void/break, none whatsoever. what wars in real life or even on games like this are ever fair, you cancel at a time that suits you to get an advantage, agreed they should have given you more time as it doesn't make for an equal fight, but when are ANY fights in this game equal. again using this to void/break the nap is utter garbage IF it is done, you have to accept wins & loses alike and take it like men not cowards who want to void. the way i see this is that 59 will profit from this more than anyone as they already seem to be growing ahead of the other two. makes for a very interesting 3 horse race.

"cancelling on a fam thats allready on its knees having just come out of a heavy war with the top fam

smart. but then again i expect nothing less from you NW"

There is nothing wrong in what NW is doing here, you PICK your battles, its the way a WAR game "IS" like, any family that goes to war should understand that there could always be a another family waiting to prosper..

> VladTheImpaler2050 wrote:

> The only reason for the cancellation is because we didnt trust 64 to give us the 48 hrs so we figured we better give it to them so its known, i seem to remmeber that a bit back lee posted in one of these threads while they were attacking someone, something about not caring about naps! doesnt that make you a constant threat? we waited till you were done and even gave a couple days to recoop! I se your planet coiunt has went up nicely, when you finished with 59 you were 100 planets behind Us! so quit whining people!

that is pure bullshit, wtf u got ur info from idk and i dont want to know but:

1) i allways stick tothe 48hr time when canceling naps ALL WAYS
2) i wouldnt cancel on a fam the day after they got out of war with top fam, i would at least wait a few days whilst saving then cancel

im not denying its a good move by NW, but he could have waited 1-2 more days for us to somewhat recover from our war, they could have still outsaved us by far, we have no infra on 500 planets ish, no portals and no defense.

gg

well come on guys

lets just be honest here, you guys cancelled on lee after his war to gain a strategic advantage which is fine for a war game, but please do not say how its lees fault and he deserve it.

Lee
ive ben away for some time so i really dont know who you are, maybe by a different name 8 years ago i dont know, I have to go by what i hear and by what i read, and i do recall seing yu post at one point when fighting 54 that naps mean nothing!
I am not trying to insult you just trying to make you see it the way i do!
and yes i do know that theres alot of people who cant be trusted, and at the same time others can , i myself just dont know which you are!

We are not the ones who started throwing around the dishonourable tag in this thread!
We have tried to be honourable as much as possible while trying to keep up with the top 2 families we have not raped or even really took much from anyone mainly because some of our people didnt like the idea of attacking under 7th when we ere in top 3 ! I have myself always tried to play with honour, sometimes yes you have to remove threats but as a rule i like staying within 2-3 steps down from my family size! I have played with some of the best here, on both sides! hell once i had 2 families not allied start a war with my family at the same time, we gave you time as i said we could have cancelled while you were fighting so you had no chance to recover but we didnt, the way you guys talk here i am starting to think we made a mistake in giving you the chance, you are saying we are dishonourable so why shouldnt we have been that way!