Topic: Lasers

should not count as a "building" 

think about it.

"It's very quiet on the political arena. I wish someone would stir up some trouble!"

Re: Lasers

meaning ob doenst apply to them?

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Lasers

I agree. Something should be changed to make them more useful on the longterm.

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

Re: Lasers

but then u gotta make sure people can counter bigger ammounts of lasers.
by making attack strenght count for bombers aswell

so now 10 bombers can take 1 laser, with 50% attack 10 bombers can take out 1.5  and if u got higher attack rc it goes up even more... or something like this.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Lasers

or we make lasers hit figs as well. so they are more worth having even if they take up space as building. Or we remove that too, not sure how I think on that atm tongue

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

Re: Lasers

wat
laser cant hit figs ?

Rchie

Re: Lasers

Perhaps you could make lasers benefit from military science!

Make Eyes Great Again!

The Great Eye is watching you... when there's nothing good on TV...

Re: Lasers

lasers AND bombers

oh poor poor bankers sad

new special building for them ...stronger lasers , as and option  with droids and tax offices ...hehe tongue

Rchie

9 (edited by Hoffman600 13-Jan-2012 01:32:34)

Re: Lasers

Revs along with custom bankers choosing TOs in their race should be able to upgrade their lasorz to imbatowers or teslacoils or something... anything significaly stronger than todays laser. This upgraded UNIT (not building, cause of insane OB prices) could be able to hit both figs, bombers and trannys

Also, if this is implemented, a PI shouldnt tell exactly how many of the different cannons protecting the planets. Building a proper lasertrap today requires immense amounts of cash and ressis to build.

Re: Lasers

Gonna add this to the list of projects for our Think Tank group.

There is merit in changing the laser system as it stands. Last round in MW with the 2 week delay lasers were pretty much pointless. I went with no lasers the entire round and maintained a large planet count. That has to tell ya something.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

Re: Lasers

- Lasers ruin OB %  - 
They should be regarded the same as portals - present when building, but invisible when complete.  - same ob rules apply to building them.

"It's very quiet on the political arena. I wish someone would stir up some trouble!"

Re: Lasers

Good point something needs to be changed big_smile

True LEGEND

Re: Lasers

change lasers to orbital lasers wink
then u can implement the idea from elro aswell that they can hit fighters since they remain in space to kill of the defending army then the bombers and transports come into action!

this would also logicaly remove the need for being present at the planet!
win win win.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Lasers

It has always bothered me that the bombers are so accurate they hit absolutely nothing but lasers x(

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

Re: Lasers

> Paininside wrote:

> change lasers to orbital lasers wink

So we gonna start naming new changes to their inventors? big_smile

Re: Lasers

you may keep the credit mate ;p i dun care.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Lasers

mans a genius

"It's very quiet on the political arena. I wish someone would stir up some trouble!"

Re: Lasers

> Paininside wrote:

> you may keep the credit mate ;p i dun care.

Not me wink

Lets run it again, this time slowly.

See the name Orbital towers yes?

Good.

Now, 1+1= ... ?

Re: Lasers

lasers not towers can only build towers on land, and our planetairy system doesnt have a moon so u cant build there either, so id prolly be satalites if your a evolved 50% rc race. else your stil using intergalactic pigeons with bibiguns to get rid of enemy bombers!

and yes i <3 orbit but he knows that.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Lasers

Not if you have an orbital platform, then towers makes perfect sense -_-'

Been dreaming, I've been waiting, To fly with those brave ponies
The Wonderbolts, their daring tricks, Spinning 'round and having kicks
Perform for crowds of thousands, They'll shower us with diamonds
The Wonderbolts will see me right here at the Gala!

Re: Lasers

big object r more likely to get hit by astroids and space rubble, no way they would do build such big things in there, were talking about planetaty bombers here, bombers who kill all living things on earth if they win the planet. all humans cats and dogs even children murdered! so u should think those lasers we got now should be pritty big bad ass lasers to be able to shoot down those damn big bombers and incomming troops, their lives depends on it. destroy one platform and u lose all capability to defend yourself.

if we would have a space dock to build/repair ships etc it stil be on a moon cuz there u got natural resources aswell u could use.  cant possible sustain the oil requirements to keep shooting out hundreds of thousends of fighters bomber and transport ships in space with the earth asmospher the moon is far better less resistance etc.

but we dont have a moon so i guess their using a sort of stargate tehcnology to portal their troops into space.

no, all these reasons why orbital platforms dont make sence!

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Lasers

wouldn't it make more sense to call them orbital drones? Ones that shoot lasers and such!

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

Re: Lasers

only for peops with -30% attack in their race, peops with 50% attack r stuck with the lasers their less fast so cant defend all space territory as effectivly as those drones ;p
give bankers some way to defend themselves against big bad attackers!

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Lasers

No, they should totally be called tesla coils.

Re: Lasers

I say we just create a new unit, we shall call it "Hippies" and you send them in before your fleet and they take out the Lasers using "Flower power"...But to counter the new and improved "Hippies" (new and improved because we are in space and "Woodstock" is long gone), we remove bombers, figs, transports, soldiers, agents, wizzies, droids, and we just have "Hippies", and the new unit to counter them "The evil government"...

Alternatively, work on the mechanics of lasers first and then quibble over what to call them and where they are built (because the name and location is irrelevant information wink)

"It has always bothered me that the bombers are so accurate they hit absolutely nothing but lasers x("

I suggested in the Think Tank that we change bombers to also destroy a portion of the existing infra...collateral damage exists in war, why not in IC...

I give your invention the worst score imaginable. An A minus MINUS!
~Wornstrum~