Re: 39 & 41 vs. 44 & 33
Am I wrong?
Put yourself in my position.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 39 & 41 vs. 44 & 33
Am I wrong?
Put yourself in my position.
> 0rion wrote:
> > Brandonn wrote:
> 262 from #5544
that was us previous year. We raided their top 5. So they had basicly no defences. Congrats to the one who saw this and was smart enough to attack them when they were harmless. We stoped because it was just too sad ![]()
lol, you knew this would go this way, thats exactly why you did this. They were and are a bunch of unorganized players, you just wanted planets, no war. Nothing wrong with that, but dont try to hide behind a silly excuse then
What are you talking about? I'm not hiding behind a sily excuse. They weren't even fighting back. Only 1 person was retaking, but me and M were portalling in other systems of them and so was capleton. They begged us to stop. If it was me, i would've continued. But our leader decided to stop the fight and i support my leader 100%.
So Orion, i challenge you, to a dual to the death of...
Free Hugs!
I do love free hugs
. And like i said, there is nothing wrong with willing to have more planets, but you went a bit too hard on a family without any organisation or real activity. This is just my opnion though
Too hard? I've been e'honourable' all my ic life. We should've raped them. They didn't even deserve to have that amount of planets. We did what we had to do ![]()
Orion how does one find out how active/organized a fam is? Would you have poked at a fam you had a bunch of shares with to check their activity? Or would you go hard and war to find out there wasnt much fight in them and offer nap?
And either way, this is about 39/41...
BOOOOOOO 39/41!!!! ![]()
"We might be the most unorganized family right now... "
Not compared to '44. ![]()
Also 5533 still owes me 350 planets. I'm suggesting they're gonna focus on some kinda arrangement both families can settle down for
Lol yeah, not for nap payment though. Just core violations
- CAPTURES -
----------------
108 planet(s) captured by TK412 (84 %) (62 retakes).
43 planet(s) captured by TK8008135 (67 %) (12 retakes).
13 planet(s) captured by TK214 (100 %) (13 retakes).
6 planet(s) captured by tk420 (86 %) (5 retakes).
6 planet(s) captured by TK237 (46 %) (6 retakes).
3 planet(s) captured by TK501 (100 %).
-------------------
136 from #5533
43 from #5544
-------------------
---------------
- DEFEATS -
---------------
118 planet(s) lost by TK412
30 planet(s) lost by TK8008135
8 planet(s) lost by TK501
1 planet(s) lost by tk420
-------------------
139 to #5533
18 to #5544
Year 17
- CAPTURES -
----------------
67 planet(s) captured by TK412 (70 %) (22 retakes).
33 planet(s) captured by TK123 (100 %) (26 retakes).
1 planet(s) captured by tk420 (33 %).
-------------------
94 from #5533
4 from #5544
3 from #5539
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 101 times. 3 families and 86 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 79 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 7.
30 planet(s) from TK8008135 have been blown up.
--------------
- DEFEATS -
---------------
23 planet(s) lost by TK412
17 planet(s) lost by TK123
13 planet(s) lost by tk420
5 planet(s) lost by TK237
1 planet(s) lost by TK501
1 planet(s) lost by TK8008135
-------------------
58 to #5533
2 to #5544
-------------------
We have been beaten 60 times. 2 families and 47 planets involved.
We actually lost 12 planet(s) in total. At least we were able to retake 35.
really needs to end its kind of pointless at this point... i retake you retake.. i retake again and pop a port you retake.. i pop another port and retake you retake..............
Imperial Forum → Universal News → 39 & 41 vs. 44 & 33
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.