• Posts: 793

Re: 20/15 vs 17

ok.. i just wanna say..

15/20 toughen up! for the love of my ass!

you guys cancelled on us right after we where finished with 10, and now 17 does the same thing to you and i see all these complaints.

and it doesnt count that we wanted to declare earlier, thats because we wantted to suprise you and atleast have an strategic advantage. because the savings advantage was and is definetely on your alliance. its a game, and we had the odds against us also but still we fought you guys without the whining.

as teddy stated its 2 vs 1, and eventually they might lose due to all the shares. but still they wanna play this game even though might lose.

No stop crying! you cant have your planets back..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,686
  • Tag points: 112

Re: 20/15 vs 17

> Chaosreturnes wrote:

> ok.. i just wanna say..

> for the love of my ass!


Rofl, that's not then 1st time he's said that folks =P

Watch out Banana, its pedo bear !!!!!! =O

[18:19] <Nick> i would be the best homosexual ever

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 20/15 vs 17

> Chaosreturnes wrote:

> ok.. i just wanna say..

15/20 toughen up! for the love of my ass!

you guys cancelled on us right after we where finished with 10, and now 17 does the same thing to you and i see all these complaints.

and it doesnt count that we wanted to declare earlier, thats because we wantted to suprise you and atleast have an strategic advantage. because the savings advantage was and is definetely on your alliance. its a game, and we had the odds against us also but still we fought you guys without the whining.

as teddy stated its 2 vs 1, and eventually they might lose due to all the shares. but still they wanna play this game even though might lose.


Nah, savings was equal. We just used ours better =p

Actually, 15 had more stuff than anyone. But they only had one attacker. And he was a noob. And he crashed his fleet into a DS on the 2nd attack so it didn't matter anymore lol


But in the end, you guys just didn't really fight all that great in terms of trying to win. Like 2-3 ticks in, all you guys did was try to hit bankers. And I guess that's what looks good on paper but in a cancellation war you have to clear out the attackers. No ifs ands or buts about that. You guys did a great job of being active and making it difficult, but you gotta clear the threats before you do anything else. Can't win a war in the first couple ticks, but you can sure lose it lol

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,686
  • Tag points: 112

Re: 20/15 vs 17

I keep hearing this "equal savings" term used by yourself Nolio but as the 1st tick of the war proved, it simply isn't true

Watch out Banana, its pedo bear !!!!!! =O

[18:19] <Nick> i would be the best homosexual ever

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 793

Re: 20/15 vs 17

you've been saving for all that time and you had equal savings? that sounds either very good on our part, or very louzy infra on your part. And i cant imagine that your alliance has sucky infra.

the only reason we didnt use all our resources efficiently, because we where worried that you guys would jumped attaackers to 50mil easy. we would have been bashed, and wouldnt have been able to hit your bankers also.

No stop crying! you cant have your planets back..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 20/15 vs 17

Our infra has been shit all round lol

We had to do infra jumps a few days before the war just to be able to make enough stuff for a war =p

Since the first tick attacks started this round we have been in conflicts with people. That plus inactivity made for a pretty crappy infra round lol

But yeah, savings were more or less equal. Well we had a little more resources/cash than you did. But when you take into consideration that you already had fleet, it was balanced.


@Insane, did you look at the first tick's nw's?




5520

Inactive     Chatter Rings     Camaar     23221065gc    111    [ONLINE]
Inactive     Scrunchies     Ussvo     17916383gc    120    [ONLINE]
Inactive     Crocks     shut the front door     5694936gc    128    [ONLINE]


5515

Inactive     hercules     alaskan gold     43461203gc    153   
Fleet Admiral     Jah     Ras Tafari     5932398gc    152

vs

5521

Fleet Admiral     Tupac Amaru Shakur     Thug Life     23759887gc    111    [ONLINE]
    Dr Dre     Camaar     13986500gc    139   
    Ice Cube     G2ORR     7501542gc    116   

5522

Fleet Admiral     Bad Guy     really bad     21493905gc    90    [ONLINE]
Inactive     Papi Rico     Camaar     17363662gc    56   
Inactive     Tommy Devito     Awesomeness     13858002gc    73    [ONLINE]
Inactive     Nolio Killer     Camaar     4428167gc    83


Actually going back and looking at things, we had less fleet even lol

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 793

Re: 20/15 vs 17

i cant look at this painfull sight of me ffing up first tick =\ plz delete that post!:p

No stop crying! you cant have your planets back..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 722
  • Tag points: 50

Re: 20/15 vs 17

Nolio, you don't take into account that 1 tick later Genesis jumped to 35 mill NW smile

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 793

Re: 20/15 vs 17

yeah! what lethal said!

No stop crying! you cant have your planets back..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,134
  • Tag points: 322

Re: 20/15 vs 17

haha was just about to say the same thing tongue

@Chaosreturnes : we cancelled on you guys close after your war, which was maybe not the fairest thing to do, but please don't compare it with this situation. The difference is and it matters a lot in my opinion is that we were still warring instead of actually being done, which means that we have no cash savings, a big loss in infra and an insane amount of unportalled planets.

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 793

Re: 20/15 vs 17

but same counts for us as for you now. infra got wacked, alot of planets unportalled. planning, and planning again after someone(we all know who) told you guys that we wanted to strategicly cancell on you guys. we had like 2 days savings, thats jack shit ya know. you have had like atleast 1 day of saving allready, and you can utilize the 2 vs 1 tactic.

No stop crying! you cant have your planets back..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,134
  • Tag points: 322

Re: 20/15 vs 17

The situation is similar but not comparable. There just is a difference in cancelling on someone who is in a war and to someone who just had a war. If you don't see that then I don't care. I am done with this.

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 793

Re: 20/15 vs 17

well ok;-) i agree on you  with that;)

now lets hugg

No stop crying! you cant have your planets back..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,085
  • Tag points: 62

Re: 20/15 vs 17

why is 20 and 15 crying? serious yall are vets and mods.. u cant win every round .. just take it that ur gonna get beat unless u cheat some how which i dont rule out;)  the same thinag that u did to us( 21) is gonna happen to u .. u played a good round and played a good strat .. but its not gonna work out in ur favor this time. suck it up and take it like a man .. well i forgot KT  is with yah wink love yah babe!

" i am the bringer of death.. destroyer of worlds"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 712
  • Tag points: 522

Re: 20/15 vs 17

Crying? No, just a little erked that a less skilled fam might end up winning a round. Its just a bit annoying that some people don't care enough about the well-being of the game that they are willing to go to such shitty lengths in order to win a round in a dying space themed text based game lol. The players are the only thing thats left thats keeping this game together but theres not gonna be players for much longer if people are rewarded with winning a round for being dishonorable cheats tongue

Being dishonorable is hardly fun for anyone(I guess it gets some people off) but apparently thats the only way to win a round these days... Why even put in that new rule if you're gonna allow a fam to farm their ally anyways lol

Whea!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 712
  • Tag points: 522

Re: 20/15 vs 17

And rofl at the kids in 21 and 22 "Waaaa if we can't win then we don't want the people that beat us fair and square to win either!" Loll, what are guys 12? 11? (Like kids even play this game tongue, but for the sake of the thread I'll keep it) Unlatch from your mom's tit and let someone else have a turn tongue

Whea!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 793

Re: 20/15 vs 17

we should have had that 2 vs 2 vs 2. then we wouldnt have these bullshit convo's.

No stop crying! you cant have your planets back..

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Remo
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,297
  • Tag points: 31

Re: 20/15 vs 17

Lol Nolio sorry but your full of crap with the equal savings, sorry but its just not true. We have a bit over 1 bil in savings, through visions we found 7+ bil on you guys so didn't even begin to say savings were equal.
And with regards to fighting a cancellation war, we are very aware that attackers need to be cleared first, unforunately our inferior savings didn't allow our attackers to jump large enough to clear yours so we did what we could and hit bankers, it made more sense than just sitting back and watching ourselves get destroyed.

<&InSaNe> so for reference tco has a ticklish bumhole
<@SerialBusiness> good to know. I will make a note of this

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 20/15 vs 17

7 billion? LOL

Nooooo way. In fact,we had to ask our allies for cash and the stuff that we used to jump Gen we bought off the market. Trust me, we were not the bank of IC =p

I have logs of what we had saved. We had something like 3billion gc, 150mil iron and 30mil endy. That is what we accumulated in 5 days of saving. It was pretty bad.

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,686
  • Tag points: 112

Re: 20/15 vs 17

So you had 3 times the amount of Gc we did, equal ftw lol

Watch out Banana, its pedo bear !!!!!! =O

[18:19] <Nick> i would be the best homosexual ever

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 20/15 vs 17

Well from infils, I'm fairly sure that you had a lot more than that =p

But still, you have to take in account that you guys already had attackers at 7, 8, 12mil fleet or whatever. We jumped from scratch. So its not like you needed to save so much more. It all equates to about the same, hence why when the war started first tick, everyone was about the same nw.

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 20/15 vs 17

We were so poor we couldn't even jump anybody to do infils or build wizzies lol

Torqez was raging because we had no idea who had what fleet =p

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,054

Re: 20/15 vs 17

Just for the record. U guys had about 7 billion cash. Or so u claim.
we had 1.7 billion. Just to clear that up. Ill just be the random fact guy. I like watching this better than stating what actually happened smile

The Last Pre-Beta Vet

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Remo
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,297
  • Tag points: 31

Re: 20/15 vs 17

Lol Nolio infils aren't gonna be accurate, we were sending stuff every which way just to mess with infils so that's bit gonna work. We had just over 1 bil and yes we already had fairly large attackers but they also had no cons left. You can say what you want nolio but it wasn't even close to equal. But I take it as a compliment tbh, you guys thought hitting us so soon after a war was the only chance you had at winning, and I'd have to agree smile

<&InSaNe> so for reference tco has a ticklish bumhole
<@SerialBusiness> good to know. I will make a note of this

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,639
  • Tag points: 345

Re: 20/15 vs 17

fyi, I msg'd leaders in 21/22 for a nap after they asked for them. But I'm now getting the silent treatment and attacks are still going. So war is still on!

Sex without the e is still SX!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points