Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Questions → New moral limit?
Errr, im sorry mods but i think this is a bad idea. setting a limit of 5 morals is not good for this game, especially considering people who are inactive, go on vacation, or how many attackers a family has. I think it puts inactive fams at a real disadvantage before a war even starts and i think we need to revoke this idea.
open to opinions....
i agree.. some people are limited with the time they do have on here.. so its important to be able to do as much as u can while u are here
yep i been against it since day 1 when it was released MID ROUND X(
the problem u have with this rule is that the proper organised fams benifit the most, proper as in having manny active attackers.
now u can so easely rape a fam 2v1 purely cuz of lack of morale that one fams attackers have. this is not strategy its a abuse if u ask me.
in the old days u could have 1 person defending your fam, and even your aliance aslong u fed him enuf morales and fleet accordingly. Now fams with top infra and no attackers cant do jack to defend themselves.
For top fams, in players/skils/activity it doesnt matter, they wil survive with whatever morale rules u would invent. But this rule was made to help the shitty fams being able to defend themselves from top fams due to their lack of morale cuz of this rule. think again.
Wow, what a gay rule is that >.< takes away all the fun. I say just change it back. I dont see why they changed it in the first place anyway. CHANGE IT BACK!
Isn't the idea to move away from solo-play?
The point, I believe, is to encourage more attackers to get involved and start being useful.
Imo, it's pretty stupid to have a 'super attacker' in a fam, with so much fleet and 20-30 morales and he can just do w/e he wants. Especially in light of the new Sentinel Tag, he could attack anyone in any fam, and not have to worry about morale.
Perhaps it benefits Drafted fams vs undrafted ones ...but at least theres a need now for more attackers, ranged at different networths, to actually do something - just like how it was in the days of no morale planets.
> Torqez wrote:
>Imo, it's pretty stupid to have a 'super attacker' in a fam, with so much fleet and 20-30 morales
>and he can just do w/e he wants. Especially in light of the new Sentinel Tag, he could attack anyone
>in any fam, and not have to worry about morale.
That's the new strategy. Declare war against a itsy-bitty family. Give your top attacker the sentinel tag. Simply have him blow up every single planet they own and follow up with expos. Great late-round strategy for easy planets. Ensures much complaining in forums.
"Imo, it's pretty stupid to have a 'super attacker' in a fam, with so much fleet and 20-30 morales and he can just do w/e he wants. Especially in light of the new Sentinel Tag, he could attack anyone in any fam, and not have to worry about morale."
maybe this sentinel stuff, plus the limited morales plus the reduced DSs and all of those late rules we're *surpringsly* living in the last days of the moron empire, are just rules that mods added so the big fams have it even easier to smash small families an kill all those stupid/annoying/useless/inactive/boring/retarded/idiotic/noobish ..... well damn, all the new players I mean 
i agree render!
same for the 6 - 8 explo limit a day, also only benifits the good fams
just remove morales off ic
Imperial Forum → Questions → New moral limit?
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.