ahh so you must be garen?

cool you even in 16 lol

LoL "Garen"    Leage Of Legends    175257gc    54

Hmm, so 2 wars already on forum that were simply declared to use sentinel tag.

Thoughts: Great idea.  Maybe a little overpowered.  This is also gonna cause the declaration of dozens of bogus wars to deal with intruders and probably reduce the number of real wars.

Gl   '11,   ive had enough of 16 and their bs.   FLIP FTW

will be 1v1 as i just signed a pnap with 07.

They warred 17 and 10 so got around our area. I left them while they warred other than when they got shares. they are close to us and i figured we'd get 2v1 at some point so might as well get it over with now while they are still trying to be top fams

If 16 wins this war, don't expect mercy.

If 5517 wins this war, there'll be massive whining in Uni

> Paininside wrote:

> Didnt they leave u alone for a reason in the first place? Why wouldnt they had hit u allready by now? (as in before u declaired)

It was already a shooting war before 5511 declared on 5516.  Lots of planets going back and forth.  5516 had the luxury of being a functional family though.  They'd send a big attacker, take a planet, and then follow up with a transport and 2 droids by their 100kNW attacker.  We had to declare war to use the sentinel tag and avoid getting cored.  It's not a war war... it's just a sentinel war.  5511 doesn't have that luxury.  1 committed attacker, a resourcer helping out, and a family full of pseudo-inactives?  Using sentinel to deal with intruders was the only option we had.

And as for why this all started, why the #11 family started hitting the #4 and #6 families simultaneously, 5507 and 5516 were exploring our core.  5507 was beginning to farm some of our core systems.  Sure 5511 started the major attacks against 2 top fams, but 5507 and 5516 were already farming 5511 before this started.

(As for the hits on the banker in 5516... the shooting war was already well underway and an attacker working on plists saw some excellent targets of opportunity... can't fault the #11 fam for doing everything it can to convince the #4 fam  that a NAP makes sense)

whiner

got a question Cal and its a YES or NO answer, any other BS response is exactly the BS response you will get for an answer about a pnap break.

1. Did YOU break a CF with 07 "while" the nap talks were being figured out?

of course YES is the answer and you were told that very tick that that planet would be required with the 30 explored for the pnap to be agreed upon.

I dont give a crap that when I wrote the nap that I didnt "specifically" put that planet in the nap clause because the message was already sent that we would get it if we did agree to a nap.

YOU NEVER RESPONDED TO THAT MESSAGE AND SAID NO THAT WILL NOT BE AGREED UPON.

SO WHINE IN UNI ALL YOU WANT.

YOU BROKE CF; NOT US, WE DIDNT EVEN BREAK IT "AFTER" YOU DID.

SO ONE WORD BROKE IS NO WORSE THAN THE OTHER AND TRUST ME I WILL TAKE IT BY FORCE IF FLIPMODE DOESNT MAKE YOU RETURN IT ;P

and I dont care about the whines in here.

so answer the question "did you break the cf"? - btw I have the message you sent concerning doing it so dont lie or I show it too.

In response to Cal asking me where we are concerning the nap, AFTER he broke the CF

Week 18, 14Send Another MessageSave
im talking with korri now. if we do then I get that planet back plus the 30 explored
Sent to SavingHawaii of Cal (#5511)

These words mean what they mean "if we do then I get that planet back plus the 30 explored"

if we do (meaning nap) I get that (CF broke) planet back PLUS the 30.

YOU STILL HAVE NOT ANSWERED THE QUESTION

DID YOU BREAK THE CF?

If you did then is me breaking nap any different that you breaking cf?

if you breaking nap is breaking your word, then why would I care about holding to mine.

If the nap was ONLY offered and signed with the fact that that planet was to be returned then its not breaking nap.

ANSWER THE QUESTION YES OR NO DID YOU BREAK THE CF WHILE NAP TALK WERE GOING ON?

ANSWER THE QUESTION YES OR NO DID YOU BREAK THE CF WHILE NAP TALK WERE GOING ON?

wyvern of course gets the planet back in 49,90. we attacked during CF - i told cal to i never knew about CF WS never told me.

But WS reaction was way over the top. Its one planet, i have a planet in that system you could have asked me no need to go around swearing. uncalled for if you asked me but you guys will get your planets and you will not break nap. if you break nap. well then I can't say anything about that other than i hope you get it back by the entire galaxy.

heres play by play of 07

"nap talks"
"just attack cal its a new planet i don't want him using CF to stall"
"attacked"
"hey we had cf"
"ya well sign nap then"
"ok"
"nap signed'
"but you broke Cf!"

how can you bring up a cf break when it was a cf break and then a nap sign? I have already explored your planets and this nap is finalized no ones bullshitting anyone here.