Too obvious subjects, they're subjects a child would pick. There are a lot more interesting things to write about.
Medieval city revolts (like Jacob van Artevelde's revolt) are quite interesting..

How about "Did King Arthur exist and what historical evidence is there supporting or denying his existence?"

Yes it is an obvious question, but it can raise some very interesting sidelines.

William the conqueror and the norman invasion of 1066?

> Wild Flower Soul wrote:

> Too obvious subjects, they're subjects a child would pick. There are a lot more interesting things to write about.
Medieval city revolts (like Jacob van Artevelde's revolt) are quite interesting.. <

Your historical elitism is duly ignored Wouty.

Also nobody cares about Belgian history.

is that the one where they killed Charles the Good while he was giving alms to the poor from a stool, and then when the French put the rebels down, they hanged most of them, and it wasn't fast enough to suit the citizens and they climbed onto the gallows and strangled the perps with a dog's intestines, and then put their corpses in a tree hugging each other to show their conspiracy; and the one rebel said "Hey I'm a noble" so they gave him trial by combat, and he was gonna win and cut the knights head off, and he was sitting on the knight's chest to take off his helmet, and the knight reached up and "pulled his private parts through the plates of his armor" so the rebel begged off and was hanged with the rest?

Cause if not, you should do that one instead it was cool