Re: ~Pinwheel round 65 PvC~
but stealth is right... its not fair at all for people to invest time for idiots to ruin their round.
Metrex
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Universal News → ~Pinwheel round 65 PvC~
but stealth is right... its not fair at all for people to invest time for idiots to ruin their round.
well he's not right about anything its a known fact multis ruin the game lol
and this multi was in fam for 2 days so don't think he hurt their planning to much...Im glad that i don't have to worry about a player sneaking in my core thats forsure though
He was a multi in MW as well where he had 2 accounts in the same family. Only today were those accounts blocked, which means he played MW for most of the round.
he had 3 empires in same fam in mw ![]()
update since war started:
Captures:
329 from #5361
163 from #5369
Defeats:
382 to #5361
117 to #5369
yes 5368 is doing good. I am very glad we hit first or it would have been a tough war. Lawless is a retake champ, good work dude
they are taking all the hits, fleet losses and constant OH however.
61/69:
2 BAD Acidtrip doghouse 357 6856142
6 America Cares Bear The Seed 2.0 250 5348685
9 Oopsy Bear Camaar 116 4535965
62 BAD Soloist Camaar 143 1229023
68:
1 Ace High Squirt
if 68 had semi decent allies, we would be doing a lot better. Can't do much against a 2v1.
I didn't jump gun lol
They were going to hit Thursday morning so i did the right thing.do wish rd was on at the time tho then woulda really cleared back
3k
1 BAD Girls with Guns (5361) [58,18] 3004 37975779 194250
69/61 have napped 68. this is my fams stats
last year
- CAPTURES -
----------------
181 planet(s) captured by BAD Acidtrip (79 %) (80 retakes).
49 planet(s) captured by BAD Dog (96 %) (3 retakes).
47 planet(s) captured by BAD Soloist (68 %) (8 retakes).
33 planet(s) captured by BAD Cheetah (77 %) (11 retakes).
17 planet(s) captured by BAD Oldtimerz (71 %).
7 planet(s) captured by BAD MATH (78 %).
2 planet(s) captured by BAD Boy (67 %).
1 planet(s) captured by BAD Man (100 %) (1 retakes).
-------------------
337 from #5368
----------------
- BLOW-UPS -
----------------
56 enemy planet(s) blown up by BAD Acidtrip
31 planet(s) from BAD Dog have been blown up.
24 planet(s) from BAD Soloist have been blown up.
---------------
- DEFEATS -
---------------
105 planet(s) lost by BAD Acidtrip
73 planet(s) lost by BAD Cheetah
27 planet(s) lost by BAD Smell
21 planet(s) lost by BAD Soloist
13 planet(s) lost by BAD Oldtimerz
5 planet(s) lost by BAD Dog
2 planet(s) lost by BAD Man
2 planet(s) lost by BAD Boy
1 planet(s) lost by BAD Hangover
-------------------
249 to #5368
-------------------
THIS YEAR
----------------
- CAPTURES -
----------------
186 planet(s) captured by BAD Acidtrip (74 %) (42 retakes).
48 planet(s) captured by BAD Soloist (89 %) (6 retakes).
38 planet(s) captured by BAD Boy (57 %) (4 retakes).
33 planet(s) captured by BAD Cheetah (89 %) (19 retakes).
9 planet(s) captured by BAD Oldtimerz (100 %).
1 planet(s) captured by BAD MATH (17 %).
-------------------
315 from #5368
----------------
- BLOW-UPS -
----------------
34 enemy planet(s) blown up by BAD Boy
1 enemy planet(s) blown up by BAD Acidtrip
1 planet(s) from BAD Soloist have been blown up.
---------------
- DEFEATS -
---------------
112 planet(s) lost by BAD Acidtrip
36 planet(s) lost by BAD Cheetah
18 planet(s) lost by BAD Soloist
5 planet(s) lost by BAD Boy
1 planet(s) lost by BAD MATH
-------------------
170 to #5368
2 to #5369
-------------------
Well thanks for the winning round...BAD Girls all the way and the rest of yall sucked this round...no one could keep up to our alliance till eor and even then us BADDIES stepped it up once again.....Oldtimerz
DK were you in our alliance? ![]()
uhmm... 68 would've easily beat you if we had a semi decent ally. We were fighting 2v1 against other alliances the whole round as our allies went inactive during bor.
and stealthkid if us 69 had decent attackers it would of been a little more fighting going on haha
well maybe but you didn't so you can't say that. my family didn't want to ally 69 at start but i made the choice on my own to ally them. your fam could have made the choice to ally someone else. gotta deal with it.
and ya DK is oldtimerz in my fam
yea 69 was pretty inactive, the only reason we lost planets was acidtrap cleared our attackers by hitting first. We only lost the systems where he cleared our attackers out.
DK shouldnt be talking, he didn't do much in the war. Credit should go to acidtrap.
Umm 68 was boasting the whole time that they have better more active attackers yet we still gained planets as they just kept retaking and then they got smart and got cheetas planets...which i personally retook...so go eat a penis sandwich
Thanks and ill be the first one to admit you are right lol
ok let me see, 68 active attackers - Ace High & Lawless
61 active attackers - Acidtrap
69 active attackers - ?
Soloist was on and off active. We would've most likely won if this was a 1v1. But this was a 2v1 AND you guys hit first. I don't care we lost the 2v1, but seriously stfu. You did nothing, you barely did any retakes (even though they were instants for you).
Oh and stealth you may not have seen me in fam news but i opped the hell out of your fam then i noticed all u guys mass jumped agents lol a little late
I was purely supporting acid and had you guys tried pushing into our cores more u would have seen me in fam news as i joined very late my spread was horrid and i was designated core clean guy
Imperial Forum → Universal News → ~Pinwheel round 65 PvC~
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.