Week 22, 16, to Azrael of Farfalle (762)
Can we end this, so that I can concentrate on my losses.
Week 26, 16
how would you like to end it?
Signed, Azrael of Farfalle (762)
============================
This was like answering an answer with a question. I missed and overlooked your message, but when I read it I was a bit too busy to jump on figuring another way to say that I wanted to end it. It meaning the back and forth attacks.
For the record, when I could fight back I fought for our lost planets in sector 1 and did not hunt for portals or lost planets in sector 4. Your fams circumference was safeguarded and I worked on doing the same. I gave safe distance and presented no threat to any immediate systems, plus went a step further and asked for an end to the hostilities.
I abide by the basic principles of The Art of War and have never cancelled a NAP and violated any agreement. However, canceling on me given the current situation was a basic violation in my book. 759 warred 753. 759 are allied to 749. 749 cancelled an eNAP with 753, during the ePhase. There were other factors involved, but the basic principle of a man's word is more than a written document called a NAP. Preemptive strikes happen in RL, but they are justifiable on many levels and not just preventative maintenance.
Skin Job - I embrace all breathren with modest love, but my clawz extend to prevent you from ever pulling away from my flock again.
Callous is AFrayD -- I Am Somebody 2 B afraid of -- Muad'Dib tells the AFrayD what to do