Topic: Appeals court protects people videotaping police! YAY

On Friday, August 26, 2011, the First Circuit Court of Appeals, which is New England's highest federal court just below the U.S. Supreme Court, ruled that citizens are allowed to videotape law officials while they conduct official duties.

The city's attorneys made the argument that police officers should have been exempt from a civil rights lawsuit in the first place in this case because the law is unclear as to whether there's a "constitutionally protected right to videotape police" conducting their daily duties in public.

"The filming of government officials engaged in their duties in a public place, including police officers performing their responsibilities, fits comfortably within these principles [of protected First Amendment activity].," said the Court. "Gathering information about government officials in a form that can readily be disseminated to others serves a cardinal First Amendment interest in protecting and promoting the free discussion of governmental affairs."

The Court added that the police officers should have understood this all along, and that videotaping public officials is not limited to the press.

"Moreover, changes in technology and society have made the lines between private citizen and journalist exceedingly difficult to draw," the Court continued. "The proliferation of electronic devices with video-recording capability means that many of our images of current events come from bystanders with a ready cell phone or digital camera rather than a traditional film crew, and news stories are now just as likely to be broken by a blogger at her computer as a reporter at a major newspaper. Such developments make clear why the news-gathering protections of the First Amendment cannot turn on professional credentials or status."

The Court concluded that police officers are to expect to deal with certain "burdens" as citizens practice First Amendment rights, but that there needs to be a healthy balance between police officers being videotaped while acting irresponsibly and the harassment of officers with recording devices while they're conducting their duties responsibly.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: Appeals court protects people videotaping police! YAY

Seems to strengthen the extended checks and balances in your society in my opinion

LORD HELP OREGON

Re: Appeals court protects people videotaping police! YAY

Its both positive and negative. But I think its good to control the state this way. Exceptions should be made for people who try and capture maffia leaders or do controversial jobs. Those people may be filmed but should remain anonymous.

Re: Appeals court protects people videotaping police! YAY

Most phones contain video recorders these days, so that point is moot.

I am sKoE
Do you know what the chain of command is here? It's the chain I go get and beat you with to show you who's in command.

5 (edited by avogadro 10-Sep-2011 02:16:22)

Re: Appeals court protects people videotaping police! YAY

> Baratheon wrote:

> The law officials should be video-taping themselves while they are on official duties. The state takes it upon themselves to record civilians going about their day on non-official duties, therefore the responsibility to record state-paid officials should also rely on the state. I don't carry a camcorder handy all the time, so does this mean that I am exempt from this new provision?

the state policing the state, a brilliant idea!!!... don't even bother asking the police to videotape themselves, just tell them to turn themselves in if they do something wrong.

Re: Appeals court protects people videotaping police! YAY

Why would police and other government officials complain about this.  What do they have to hide, I wonder?

Re: Appeals court protects people videotaping police! YAY

> xeno syndicated wrote:

> Why would police and other government officials complain about this.  What do they have to hide, I wonder?

i imagine most police officers didn't sign up for being constantly watched under video camera. To civilians it would be like all of a sudden living in England where they videotape you doing everything.