• Posts: 3,083
  • Tag points: 378

Topic: War 67 vs 76

So you all know, Impire has raided a family about 1 third his size, his reasoning "He doesn't like our alliance". Further, he knew we were in a war as per the thread between 66 and 74.

So while it won't turn out to be much of a war, since we were already committed with another family, thought I would post it just in case anyone else decides that they don't like our alliance.

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,134
  • Tag points: 322

Re: War 67 vs 76

is it so clear? why did your allies nap us without you? so many questions left open... smile

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,230
  • Tag points: 1

Re: War 67 vs 76

You guys are great. Crying when I cancelled while you were in a war, and then you do it to us. FFS. You guys all suck. Talic, Impire, I can't belive you would do this. Especially after all the crying you guys did.

"The market is like a.....game within a game Teddy"

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

4 Reply by Talic (edited by Duke Nukem 07-Aug-2011 03:14:23)

  • Posts: 865

Re: War 67 vs 76

oh give me a break. All this bullshit talking pisses me off.

1) 5076 isn't NAP'ed
2) 5076 is allied to top 5 fam, that forfeits 5076 being smaller
3) We didn't cancel on 5076, so your comparison doesn't work out, Spam. Besides, the only way you would have been allowed to say what you just said is if we had canceled the very tick your war with 5069 started. You know, that tick before the tick your fam lost most of its fleet?
4) 5076 NAP'ed 5069 a few days ago, which we figured meant they were done fighting.
5) Don't even consider using your war with 5074 to be the reason we can't hit 5076. First, you were 1v1'ing 5074. You got your ass handed to yourself by a fam barely half your size. 5074's ally cancels on you. So then 5076 joins in on a fam barely half your fam's size that you couldn't handle?
6) We didn't cry. We merely pointed out the shitty nature of your move.
7) Last but not least, we raided someone in 5076? What? If someone's raided by us, he'd have been brought down to less than 20% of his original p count. That didn't happen in 5076's case, did it? This is merely us clearing your fam from shared systems. Piss off Impire enough and you'll lose more.

Poor excuse for a top alliance, and that's the end of it.

I'm on fire!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 803
  • Tag points: 4

Re: War 67 vs 76

@ 5) if we had got our ass handed to us by 74 why would 69 need to step in?? just wondering.... and anyways when 69 cancelled that is when 76 started to help us by opping 74 to try and get them off us so we could focus on 69..... obviously a mistake was made and then the login issue lost us some figs but shit happens...

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,083
  • Tag points: 378

Re: War 67 vs 76

In response

1) This is correct, also irrelevant to the points made

2) Correct, also irrelevant to the points made. As for the being allied to a top 5 fam, that top 5 fam is in a war too, ergo you are attacking a family a third of your size without any backup, back to you being a softcock.

3) The comparrison Spam was making was that you were whining something fierce when he was going to attack you a few days ago because you were "in a war". This comparison is apt, we are in a war.

4) Yes we NAP'd 69, doesn't mean we weren't dealing with 74 as per the other war thread

5) 5066 have had to move their focus to the larger threat, being 69. At this time we (76) have stepped in to war 74 to keep it as a 2 vs 2, so your point is irrelevant, once more.

6) Your family cried like a little bitch. And we are merely pointing out the shitty nature of your move. Problem?

7) Putting someone in p-mode and threatening to put the rest of the family in p-mode, pretty sure that is a raid halfwit.

As for pissing of Impire, he can take a long walk off a short pier for all the honour he has shown.

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,866
  • Tag points: 1

Re: War 67 vs 76

Haha! Joke of the round goes to Duke Nukem!

"I lie down next to an angel, fall asleep and fly with the demons"
I once prayed to god for some planets, but quickly found out he didnt work that way

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

8 Reply by HappyJedi (edited by [PW9]~KT~ 07-Aug-2011 04:28:12)

  • Posts: 1,744
  • Tag points: 70

Re: War 67 vs 76

Top fam bottom feeding and vulturing to try secure size win... This game really is like a business to you [ ] hmm

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

9 Reply by Paininside (edited by Zarf BeebleBrix 19-Oct-2011 20:02:39)

  • Posts: 3,202

Re: War 67 vs 76

1 who cares?
2 i care?
3 do you care?
4 i like [kitty cats]'s (u know kitty cats)
5 i like beer
6 after i had beer and pussy, i care a little.
7 i only stop hitting if da girl keeps her mouth

in short, we dont care. stop pointing out nonsence points cuz no one ever gonna give in to the opposite party so why the fudge u try to argument ur actions.
just beat the crap out of them now or keep a grudge and do it in some other round.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,083
  • Tag points: 378

Re: War 67 vs 76

Painside, are you in either fam? If not STFU. If so, you would be in 67, and all I did was respond to someone from 67 trying to justify their actions. There is no justification, they are farming and vulturing at the same time, clearly softcock move.

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

11 Reply by Galeonis (edited by Tensai 07-Aug-2011 04:53:39)

  • Posts: 1,236
  • Tag points: 3

Re: War 67 vs 76

lol 76 are crazy if they think impires attacks were them being raided. Ask 58 and their alliance what its like to be raided by our alliance. Kenpachi went from 450ish planets down to 100s, thats being raided

seriously, why shouldnt my ally attack somebody who they are not napped to? it doesnt really make any sense for them not to

- The Galeonis Empire

[00:26] <&Walking_Corpse> mapgen doesn't work right for me
[00:26] <&Galeonis> yeah yeah same with ur penis tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Tico
  • Tico
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,526
  • Tag points: 17

Re: War 67 vs 76

sure lets vulture all war with no napped fams... Its kinda lame, and even more Orion saying to me that if nap wasnt ingame, he would be attacking my fam too... lame move...

"Te he dicho que no mires atras, porque el cielo no es tuyo, y hay que empezar despacio, a deshacer el mundo..." - Heroes del Silencio

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Remo
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 1,297
  • Tag points: 31

Re: War 67 vs 76

76's planet count hasnt changed in days so they can claim war if they wish, but pretty obvious that they arent really at war. Aso if 76 wants to blame someone they could prob start with 66 since they virtually hung them out to dry.

<&InSaNe> so for reference tco has a ticklish bumhole
<@SerialBusiness> good to know. I will make a note of this

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 3,083
  • Tag points: 378

Re: War 67 vs 76

Wrong, we are at war, ask 74. Further, 66 did the honourable thing when you claimed to be in war and backed off. You guys then claim that because you dont think what we are in is a war its not. Seriously, screw you.

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 883
  • Tag points: 1

Re: War 67 vs 76

All I ask is for fam news summaries from 76 showing me how many p's are exchanged this year and last with 74, if they want to prove they are in war they have a chance.

[color=00BFFF]"Four things do not come back - the spent arrow, the spoken word, time passed, and the neglected opportunity"[/color]

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 58

Re: War 67 vs 76

that is straight up farming. 67 is a bunch of douche bags

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 5,134
  • Tag points: 322

Re: War 67 vs 76

Yea we are douches for fighting and or napping every fam in mw.

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,054

Re: War 67 vs 76

lol dont forget beating all the other fams smile

The Last Pre-Beta Vet

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 58

Re: War 67 vs 76

there are no attackers in 76. they all quit

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 58

Re: War 67 vs 76

so it's not fighting. it's farming

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Rin
  • Rin
  • Player
  • Offline
  • Posts: 7,907
  • Tag points: 21

Re: War 67 vs 76

this thread amazes me, elro doing stuff and gwynedd caring.

<parrot> there is also the odd  possibility that tryme is an idiot
<KT> possibility?
<genesis> tryme is a bit of an idiot
<Torqez> bit?

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 1,236
  • Tag points: 3

Re: War 67 vs 76

> acium wrote:

> there are no attackers in 76. they all quit


are u from 76? so u admit ur not at war? cuz if so ill send some fleets ur way too

- The Galeonis Empire

[00:26] <&Walking_Corpse> mapgen doesn't work right for me
[00:26] <&Galeonis> yeah yeah same with ur penis tongue

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,866
  • Tag points: 1

Re: War 67 vs 76

lol, there are pages and pages in our forums of Ops 76 are performing in this war... Just cos their attackers are are pussies and AFK'd on them doesnt mean they arent doing anything.

All you vultures are trying to justify this shit! Why dont you all just drop the BS and say "Hell yeh, we want easy planets from a bottom fam at war"

Names noted, dont be surprised when you guys get owned in the next war youre in... This round or next.

@Remo, STFU X( 66 have done as much as they can for a fam that is half inactive. Weve saved their asses numerous times, they are trying their best to repay the favour by throwing Ops at 74 the best they can.

Dont know if the following is allowed but its part of a summary of the damage 76 are causing 74... You throw that many ops at a fam and see if they consider it an act of war or not!X(

--- Succesful Enemy Spells & Ops ---
Hypnotize: 11
Electric Storms: 8
Nukes: 23 (4 x TOs, 6 x RCs, 3 x LQs, 4 x CFs, 1 x lasers, 2 x RSs, 2 x OCs, 1 x MFs)


--- Failed Enemy Spells & Ops ---
Hypnos: 5
Nukes: 37

"I lie down next to an angel, fall asleep and fly with the demons"
I once prayed to god for some planets, but quickly found out he didnt work that way

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

  • Posts: 2,532

Re: War 67 vs 76

what we get nuked by them too?

lol

you should have told me earlier X(

Tobi

0 Dislike 0 Post Points

25 Reply by Talic (edited by Duke Nukem 07-Aug-2011 13:28:43)

  • Posts: 865

Re: War 67 vs 76

5066 canceled on us with the intention of screwing us up, right when our war started, right when we spent our resources. That is dishonourable, a low move, worse than anything barring NAP breaks. That's what it is. Yes, they decided to reinstate the NAP after everyone in the bloody galaxy pointed out to them it was a low move and was just bullshit. Yes, it redeemed them a little bit, but it does NOT erase the fact they did TRY to bring us down while at war.


We and 5076 is a situation that you just can't compare. We didn't cancel a NAP on them to profit from the war situation they are in. We merely cleared them from our systems, took a couple extra, as we've done with many fams, all in top 10 or related to top 10. We honestly did not believe 5076 was in war, and we doubted they were even after YOUR crying about it. Planet counts didn't change. So we went for it, end of story.  And, seriously, bottom fam feeding? 5076 is ranked 11th, has ally in top 3. What the hell?

If you are indeed in war, and planets are being exchanged (I'm yet to see numbers), then we back off, plain and simple.






And how dare you compare us to people who farm bottom fams? We haven't taken a single planet from a low fam with the intent of farmin g them. I think that we may have taken 5 planets below top 10, which were all for getting spread and shares with other fams. We never ever hit a low ranking fam for more than 10 planets. All our planets came from exploring and fighting top 10 fams, or fams allied to top 10 fams. A fam that's allied to a top10 fam is a threat just the same as the top 10 fam for spread reasons or a way into cores. There's quite a few other fams this round that did feed on low ranking fams and I just won't stand for being compared with them.

I'm on fire!

0 Dislike 0 Post Points